|
The
various references to power plants in the six movies, put together,
paint a very intriguing picture.
Fusion power is clearly the rule of the day, from starships to portable
heaters. At the same time, liquid fuel is used for both starships and
ground vehicles (the Invisible
hand, AT-STs, landspeeders, podracers, etc);
we know all these references that it is flammable.
Were it used alone
by starships, we could
presume it to be a propellant; if
fusion power generators as small (and presumably inexpensive) as the
heater seen in TESB were viable, there would be no reason
to power an AT-ST chemically. Together, these bits of data from the
movies and their novelizations
combine to tell us that Star Wars starships run fusion engines that
fuse hydrocarbons.
To put it simply, Lucas has invented - intentionally or not - the
diesel starship. A raw output of 70-230 terajoules per liter (100-280
TJ/kg) is
quite enough for the purposes of any ship's actions in Star Wars.
The question of what reactor power is available, and how much fuel
storage ships actually have, is open. We have no firm upper limits from
the movies, but the hyper limits described in ANH suggest a lower limit
of 17-357 megawatts per kilogram of starship. If the hyper limits are
an obstacle that could be overcome with more power, these lower limits
also serve as upper limits once adjusted for possible efficiency.
The solution to this mystery lies
in the chemistry of hydrogen. Raw hydrogen or deuterium is a very
inconvenient fuel, with an exceptionally low density. It's also a pain
to store;
hydrogen gas easily escapes seals, and hydrogen freezes only at
exceedingly low temperatures.
Metals in contact with hydrogen react chemically with it, becoming
brittle hydrides. A stable metallic hydrogen would have the density
required, but forming it requires dangerously close to
fusion pressures, and its stability is questionable. And solid pellets
of metal are a pain to store and feed
into a reactor in a controlled fashion.
Water is often cited as a good method of storing hydrogen. Water is one
ninth hydrogen by weight,
giving it a higher volumetric density of hydrogen by weight than pure hydrogen
under all normal ranges of temperature and pressure. Heavy
water, water containing deuterium instead of
"regular" hydrogen (protium), has 0.2 grams of deuterium per
milliliter.
However, hydrocarbons are even better. A "heavy" decane would have
0.225 grams of deuterium per milliliter, while being lighter than heavy
water, less corrosive, more compressible under sudden shock; it doesn't
expand when it freezes, bursting pipes and tanks; it has over
twice the temperature range that it stays liquid in. All these features
make hydrocarbons a logical form to store hydrogen in.
As an added bonus, if your fusion engine is a robust model that can
fuse more than just hydrogen, the carbon part of hydrocarbons returns
more energy than the oxygen part of heavy water. The only disadvantage
to using hydrocarbons as fuel for fusion engines is the mass.
Considering the engineering difficulties in burning hydrocarbon fuel in
a fusion furnace, Star Wars fusion engines are clearly highly
developed. It is thus reasonable to guess that Star Wars engines get
nearly the maximum theoretical ~230 TJ/liter out of their fuel.
|
|