Borg adaptation vs blasters and turbolasers

For polite and reasoned discussion of Star Wars and/or Star Trek.
Locked
theta_pinch
Bridge Officer
Posts: 174
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Borg adaptation vs blasters and turbolasers

Post by theta_pinch » Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:59 pm

A common argument from warsies against the borg is that borg adapt by using frequencies of weapons and that blasters and turbolasers don't have a frequency so the borg can't adapt to them.

It turns out that is wrong; plasma does in fact have a frequency also called plasma oscillations thus the borg should be able to adapt.

User avatar
Mith
Starship Captain
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:17 am

Re: Borg adaptation vs blasters and turbolasers

Post by Mith » Thu Apr 10, 2014 6:23 pm

theta_pinch wrote:A common argument from warsies against the borg is that borg adapt by using frequencies of weapons and that blasters and turbolasers don't have a frequency so the borg can't adapt to them.

It turns out that is wrong; plasma does in fact have a frequency also called plasma oscillations thus the borg should be able to adapt.
Most blasters are particle weapons.

So it's not even an issue.

They also don't need a frequency to raise their shields. It's more for optimal performance.

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: Borg adaptation vs blasters and turbolasers

Post by Mike DiCenso » Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:55 am

Despite years of Warsies denial of such, the EU is filled with references to shields and by extension weapons being frequency based:

"Tyrant's Test", p. 339

"'Do you know of any weaknesses or vulnerability of the vagabond that we can exploit?

"Yes. Blaster cannon, cruiser-weight and up. The hull's not armored, and there don't seem to be ray shields, at least not at those frequencies. You can hole it and hurt it.'"


It can be inferred that since Lando knew nothing about the Vagabond, he could only assume that its shields were the same as those on any other Star Wars ship's. Therefore, not only are SW blaster cannons frequency dependent, but so are their ray shields.
-Mike

User avatar
Mith
Starship Captain
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:17 am

Re: Borg adaptation vs blasters and turbolasers

Post by Mith » Fri Apr 11, 2014 2:40 am

Mike DiCenso wrote:Despite years of Warsies denial of such, the EU is filled with references to shields and by extension weapons being frequency based:

"Tyrant's Test", p. 339

"'Do you know of any weaknesses or vulnerability of the vagabond that we can exploit?

"Yes. Blaster cannon, cruiser-weight and up. The hull's not armored, and there don't seem to be ray shields, at least not at those frequencies. You can hole it and hurt it.'"


It can be inferred that since Lando knew nothing about the Vagabond, he could only assume that its shields were the same as those on any other Star Wars ship's. Therefore, not only are SW blaster cannons frequency dependent, but so are their ray shields.
-Mike
They'd have to be, their ray shields aren't indicated to need to open 'holes' to allow them to fire (and would be inadvisable).

Lucky
Jedi Master
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Borg adaptation vs blasters and turbolasers

Post by Lucky » Sat Apr 12, 2014 4:27 am

theta_pinch wrote:
A common argument from warsies against the borg is that borg adapt by using frequencies of weapons and that blasters and turbolasers don't have a frequency so the borg can't adapt to them.

It turns out that is wrong; plasma does in fact have a frequency also called plasma oscillations thus the borg should be able to adapt.
Borg shield adaptation is not frequency dependent as they can block physical objects like Worf, and there are ways to adapt that don't involve shields.

Locked