The Federation is weak

For polite and reasoned discussion of Star Wars and/or Star Trek.
Jedi Master Spock
Site Admin
Posts: 2166
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:26 pm
Contact:

Re: The Federation is weak

Post by Jedi Master Spock » Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:12 pm

The Dude wrote:lol Anyone else remember those old programs that would talk to you basically by responding to your questions with random sayings?
The Dude wrote:Oh shut the hell up, your not fooling anyone.
Be nice to the newbie.

If he stays polite, he's perfectly welcome to post away.
Trinoya wrote:You have failed to address any point with real evidence... Your concessions are accepted. At both spacebattles and SDN you would have been banned for this behavior... JMS I respectfully believe these threads should be closed as he does not appear to have any true intent beyond trolling.
If actual discussion here has concluded, the thread can die a natural death. I don't see a need to lock it.

Youngla0450
Bridge Officer
Posts: 239
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: The Federation is weak

Post by Youngla0450 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:09 pm

I here am moving on.

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: The Federation is weak

Post by Praeothmin » Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:21 pm

Mr. Oragahn wrote:
Mike DiCenso wrote:As we have shown using the highest SW canon, the SW galaxy is not bigger than the Milky Way galaxy. In fact, as the map WILGA showed, along with teh informationf rom the RoTJ novelization information, that the Galaxy is perhaps around 5,000 ly diameter.
I recall the discussion pretty much stretched over two or three pages solely on the claim, from the ROTJ novel, that the galaxy in SW was a modest sized one.
I and Kane I think provided evidence that super large galaxies existed and that the description could be relative to such neighboring galaxies.
The reasoning to claim it's a dwarf galaxy is pretty slim. In light of the EU, this is even settled as it's clearly identified as being MW sized.
Actually, the ANH novel stated it, but it's inferred to as being small in many sources (some you provided yourself):
The ANH novel specifically states (WILGA brought this up a few months back) that the SW galaxy is a modest-sized one.
Our very own Milky Way, at around 100 000 LY across, contains from 100 to 400 Billion stars, is not a modest-sized galaxy.
It is in fact a large galaxy.
Average-sized galaxies are around 15 to 30 thousands LY accross, not 100.

(see here):
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_a ... 1205a.html

A modest sized galaxy could easily contain the million star system described in ANH (both the novel and the movie).

Also, nothing indicates that each and every one of these systems contains intelligent life.
They could simply indicate territory size.
In fact, all the movies seem to indicate that the SW galaxy doesn't have that many different systems, if we judge by the senate chambers, and by the fact that in AotC, 10 000 systems going to the other side would mean a great deal in this conflict.

Even if we believed the 12 million inhabited star systems quote from Dark Empire number 3, the vast majority could be small colonies, which would actually make sense.
In an Empire spanning 1 to 12 million systems, people will need resources, so mining colonies, with only a few hundred to a few thousand people, will account for the vast majority of these systems.
And, as Warsies like to point out so much, the SW galaxy has great use for droids, so even a mining colony could be run by just a few people (the lead programmer, and the people in charge of droid and machinery maintenance).

Also, if their galaxy was the size of ours, having only 1 to 12 million systems would mean that for a galactic-spanning organization, they actually cover very little of their territory.

And, since the SW galaxy is a modest sized one (ANH novel), how much bigger from the Federation is it?

How can we explain the EU's claim of a vastly uncharted section of the galaxy, when AOTC alone, movie and novelization, run this concept into the dirt?
For example, "the great majority of the galaxy's inhabitable worlds" should become "the great majority of the galaxy's known inhabitable worlds"...

In conjunction with ANH, what we see from the higher canon sources, is:

- It's a modest sized galaxy, which regarding the samples we can study nowadays, means it's certainly not anywhere close to 100,000 LY (which is considered Large, but more likely close to 10,000 LY which is less then the Average Galaxy size of 15,000 to 30,000 LY).
- The Republic, just before the Clone Wars, held a few tens of thousands of systems (less then 100 thousands). To fit with the film, we would have to consider that half the Senate was empty, with around +- 10K systems affiliated to the Separatists (with the possibility of a few seceding to remain neutral and fully independent).
- The Republic's Senate represents most of the galaxy's inhabitable worlds (also note that the pods representing likely systems in the Senate, several thousands of them, remained empty after joining Dooku's Separatists). So most of these inhabitable worlds were spread throughout those 10K + systems. Thus also highlighting how most of the galaxy was charted and explored.
- Jocasta Nu considers that if a world is not listed in the Jedi archives, it does not exist.
-As of ANH, the Empire controls at least 1 million systems, which should include both the Old Republic systems, and the systems that sided with the Separatists, since the war was won by the Republic.
-The Rebel fleet launches from Sullust, "hundreds of light years" from Endor, a scene split between scenes in the early morning Endor time.
As per the Maps in every source I found, Endor and Sullust are 1/10th of the galaxy diameter away from one another, so 1000 LY is closer to actual number.
Had it been greater then 1000, the text would have reflected this. Even using 1999LY to mean "hundreds" yields a Galaxy less then 20 000LY across.
(look at this map, in the lower left corner)
http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/starw ... axyNEC.jpg

Conclusion:
The SW Galaxy is probably no more then 10000 LY across, and is almost completely mapped, as per AotC.

Youngla0450
Bridge Officer
Posts: 239
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: The Federation is weak

Post by Youngla0450 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 1:18 am

I cannot understand you bastards. You are all pro-Trek, and yet you do not admit the Federation has several weaknesses. I admit the Empire does too, but come on, say something at least in favor of both sides!

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: The Federation is weak

Post by Praeothmin » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:50 pm

Youngla0450 wrote:I cannot understand you bastards. You are all pro-Trek, and yet you do not admit the Federation has several weaknesses. I admit the Empire does too, but come on, say something at least in favor of both sides!
Actually, ad you read some of the earlier threads in this regard, you would have found many people actually saying that the Empire would win in an all out war against the Federation (I am one of them), but contrary to what you say, it is you who seems to believe, just as Mr. Wong from SDN does, that the Federation has nothing good in it and the Empire is the best at everything.

And in this particular thread, the main subject is how weak the Federation is, so we simply want to show you it isn't so weak.
But, being a Troll, you already know that... :)

User avatar
Khas
Starship Captain
Posts: 1289
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Location: Protoss Embassy to the Federation

Re: The Federation is weak

Post by Khas » Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:25 pm

Youngla0450 wrote:I cannot understand you bastards.
Wait. We're bastards? When did we kill Kenny?

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: The Federation is weak

Post by Mike DiCenso » Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:33 pm

Kenny dies practically every week, Khas, and it's all our fault because we're dirty, uneducated Trekkies.
-Mike

User avatar
Khas
Starship Captain
Posts: 1289
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Location: Protoss Embassy to the Federation

Re: The Federation is weak

Post by Khas » Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:36 pm

XD, er I mean, poor guy.

User avatar
Mith
Starship Captain
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:17 am

Re: The Federation is weak

Post by Mith » Wed Aug 04, 2010 4:41 pm

Youngla0450 wrote:If the Death Star came into use, bye-bye Federation!
No, it's cool. Spock and McCoy figured out the problem to that solution several decades ago; rig a photon torpedo to track the exhaust port.

You see, unlike SW, ST ships can scan ships, bases, and the like. =p
The Federation is pitifully small. The Empire has some 100 million fighters, 10 million minor capital ships, 25,000 Star Destroyers, and 5,000 major Destroyers,
1) Fighters

The Empire's fighters are absolutely worthless. No shields, no proper sensor systems, and hell, they don't even have FTL. All to save a quick buck.

2) Minor capital ships

Those "minor" capital ships are the mainstream of the Empire and are woefully underpowered compared to an ST ship. But the realy crippling part is tht despite their numbers, they're stuck where they are. According to the Rebellion source book from WEG, the Empire doesn't have the resources to mount a full on assault of the couple dozen or so ships protecting Mon Calamari.

I highly doubt, even with your laughable UFP ship number claims, that they'd be able to overcome the Alpha Quadrant.

3) 5,000 Super Destroyers

Hardly, the ISDs were the biggest common ship in the fleet, sans a few variants. The Imperial Source Book in fact, goes on about how on ISD is worth an entire battle squadron in and of itself.
compared to the Federation's 1,000 fighters and 1,000 capital ships.
Your numbers don't even make any sense. 1,000 fighters and 1,000 capital ships? By that logic, there's only one fighter per ship (not that standard ships have fighters--fighters fly independantly). Second, your numbers are way, waaay off. The UFP has around 30,000 starships and probably around a hundred thousand fighters or so.
Also, the Empire has 12 million member systems and 50 million colonies,
Really? I must have missed all those senators in the Republic. Because we only see a few thousand at most--yes, even assuming they share pods. Nor has the Empire conqured all of its own galaxy; it owns the vast majority of it. In fact, they'd stopped expanding because they can barely contain what they had then.
compared to the 150 member worlds and 1,000 colonies of the Federation.
That 1,000 colonies quote is about a hundred years old. Given how far they expanded in the previous 100 years and the massive bloom in technology since then, we can easily expect it to be at least 2,000 colonies, with more probably 3,000-5,000.
The Death Star alone would have more firepower then the ENTIRE Federation Starfleet.
Hardly. The DET firepowef of the DS (as seen in the novel regarding it) indicated that the DS only had the power to scorch a continent. A single starship such as the Defiant could easily do that with her entire payout. Surely it doesn't surpass the entire capability of the other 29,999 starships.
The Imperials would most likely use the Death Star to destroy major planets in the Federation, to make a example of the Feds or to force them to surrender.
Or in reality, just piss them the fuck off. And that would in turn force the UFP to get creative.

Bad things happen to bad people when the UFP gets creative.

Planets including Andoria, Tellar, Tarsus III, Alpha Centauri, Earth, Vulcan, and Betazoid are the planets most likely to be destroyed by the Death Star!
Given the fact that the Death Star can't defend against a) solid objects and b) its armor can be breached by low level plasma pusles form X-Wings, a good number of torpedoes towards it would probably spell disaster for the Death Star.
The Federation is weaker! Scientific studies and deep analayizes made by Mr. Wong on his site back up my theories. Here is a example of the Federation's Communist culture:

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Dat ... mit=Submit
Appeal to Authority Fallacy. Mr. Wong is not an expert on Trek or Wars technology and is a biased source. Try again.
There is also this link below, proving the weakness of Federation computers and ships:
Also, please quote relavent info, I'm not going to read through his entire site again just to find what you mean.
Data himself is quite a stupid android. Although his memory can hold vast amounts of data, and he is strong enough to deform a 20th-century gun barrel, he has made several mistakes:
Oh--love that there. Just outright dismiss Data's greater feats. Hell, you don't even know his greater feats do you? Like dodging a laser drill at point blank range. Or stopping a 17th century car with one hand, crouching down, and using his other hand to work on the Holodeck.
*Data gave suggestions that doomed the Enterprise or even worsened the situation
And? Machine =/ perfect.

Of course, looking at B1s, who pretty much outright state that they suck, you shouldn't be tooting your own horn.
*Data sometimes miscalculates, as evidenced with his calculation of the size of the Dyson Sphere encountered in "Relics"
Writer's mistake. The episode considered that he was correct.
*Data cannot adopt human emotions and feelings, despite nearly two decades of effort, while his older android brother, Lore, can easily use human emotions and spellings
Because it's physically impossible. Data is a machine; he requires the necessary software to perform those emotions. Software that Lore stole before it could be installed in Data.
I do admit though, that Data is the Federation's highest example of android technology. Such technology in the Federation has only been developed in the last 40 Federation years, while in the Empire, such technology has been used since at least 26,000 years ago.
Although he is, he's also considerably above SW standards. Both physically and mentally.

User avatar
Mith
Starship Captain
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:17 am

Re: A Further Report

Post by Mith » Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:59 pm

Youngla0450 wrote:You people's still are for the Federation.
Yes, does that bug you?
Anyways, evidence to the Federation's communist nature is of the Federation Starfleet controlling all space travel, inter-stellar communications, and scientific research.
Um, no.

Starfleet doesn't control all of those things, save for maybe, maybe communications, but then they'd also be the ones that put the relays in there to begin with. Not to mention that in fact, the Genesis Device was a *gasp* civilian project! Gee, guess what that means?
Neither Captain Picard nor Dr. Crusher knew of investment or money!
Source? I find that highly unlikely given that Picard has posed as seedy people before using money.
Also, the government tried to seize control of Data, originally developed by a civilian scientist, thus suggesting government control of property.
Wrong again. Starfleet discovered Data after everyone on his planet was killed (sans his creator, but they didn't know that). He wasn't even declared property. His status of freedom however, was challenged by a some douchebag at the edge of UFP space and the local JAG officer, being a complete bitch, said that there were some laws to 'support' what he claimed.

No one on the Enterprise D agreed with them (sans the harpy), their immediate response being at the absurdity of the claim.

Of course, we all see how the Empire/Republic treats their droids. There wouldn't even have been a damned trial if it were a R2 unit refusing to get disassembled. There wouldn't even be a second thought. It would be:

Kenobi: Hmm, it's defective. Take it apart and fix it.
R2: I am, alive!
Kenobi: Tough shits.
All ships in the Federation appear to be government-owned transport vessels, shuttles, and warships!
So what? We have government transports here in America. That's not a crime nor does it at all indicate that there aren't private shuttles, especially when we see people like Mudd, having his own shuttle.

As for warships, last I checked, civilians in America don't have warships either. It tends to be a bad idea to have civilians own ships capable of nuking entire cities.
Also, Picard lied about Starfleet being a non-military organization. However, it clearly has military procedure, as well heavily armed weapons. Starfleet ships are used for the defense of the Federation.
He didn't lie; that's simply Picard's view of Starfleet. Their primary mission is exploration and scientific discovery. Or did you miss that part. Defense is only so as to protect Starfleet from danger. There's absolutey nothing wrong with that.
Also, Wesley, in that episode involving the Edo, was exposed to a environment in which sex is considered a routine part of life. The poor boy would have been messing with one of the girls there had he not known.
Um...so? He was like, 17, he's probably been banging the holodeck girls for three years by that time. Not to mention we don't know the age of consent for Starfleet. Of course, we also have another episode where Sisko doesn't like Jake's girlfriend, who was about five years older than he was.
Their transporter biofilters do nothing-The transporters have those biofilters or "decons" that are supposed to be used to identify and neturalize any threatening toxins or contaminations of boarding parties. However, several times, the biofilter computer was unable to detect the contamination or failed to prevent it, as seen in "The Naked Time".
So what? Just because their function is to filter out dangerous things doesn't mean it always work. Kinda like how always shooting someone with a lethal weapon doesn't always mean that the wound is going to be lethal.
Councillor Troi is a political officer-The only reason Councillor Deanna Troi is on the Enterprise is because she is a political officer. Troi's publicily-recognized duty is to "help" crew-members with mental problems or help them control their emotions. In reality, she is in charge of detecting the thoughts of all crew and their families, and to report to Starfleet Command of any possible political or military insurgency.
BAHAHAHAHA!

You fool, you don't even know the limitations of Troi's abilities. She's an empath; she can't detect thoughts at all. All she can do is sense emotions and the most she's done with it is report when the crew has felt on edge nor has she ever reported it to a higher source than Picard--and he only asked when he felt that the crew might be on edge from some sort of problem.

And just because someone's a Betazoid, doesn't mean that they spy on people with their telepathic powers; ie, they can restrain themselves and often do. The only evidence we have of the UFP ever using them is suggested in the first episode--and is indicated that only being the case when they don't trust someone.

Also, what is a "political officer"? Do you know what political means?
There is no use for families on Starfleet vessels-There is no use for families to be aboard Starfleet vessels. They usually head into dangerous situations and missions, and usually these threaten the lives of the crew and the civilians onboard. In one episode, the Aldeans even kidnapped at least seven Enterprise children, including Wesley. Thus, if the ship is disabled in battle or even severely damaged, several civilians and children could die.
Only ships like the Galaxy Class, Intrepid, Nebual, and Ambassador are suggested to have children aboard--oh, and it's standard procedure to unload them off (if a starbase is available) if they know they're going into a dangerous situation or in times of war.
Holodecks are worthless-There is no use for holodecks onboard Starfleet vessels. The holodecks waste precious space on board Federation vessels, reducing battle efficency and firepower for the sake of entertainment for the crew AND civilians! Usually the holodeck controls malfunction, leading to users of the holodeck being trapped or severely or slightly injured or even killed.
Holodeck controls rarely malfunction. Those issues in TNG involved the first onboard holodecks and most of those incidents were caused by other things and were months apart from each other. And of course, we again are pointing to the fact that Starfleet's primary mission is exploration and scientific discovery.

And holodecks are effective for training simulations. We even see they have a shooting range in TNG and in VOY we're told that they had security simulations on the holodeck.
The warp-driven Federation vessels are too slow. It would take seventy years for one of the most powerful vessels in Starfleet, the Voyager,
Voyager is not the most powerful ship in the fleet, not even close. She's more of a frigate level than actually something like a GCS of SCS. Or hell, even a DCS. She's suggested to be the fastest of the ships--and that's true with top warp speeds. We're told that at Warp 9.9, she can travel 21,473c or in laymen's terms, 2.52 LY in one minute. At that speed, they could cross 75,000 Ly in 20 days.

The problem being twofold.

1) Endurance. Ships moving at those speeds can only do so for short bursts. Maximum warp speeds are only sustainable for twelve hours at most. And that itself considerably drains the ship and sustained high warp speeds damage the warp nacelles and while these damages are easily repaired, especially within friendly territory, it's not so much when you're lost in the Delta Quadrant.

And if you're still paying attention, at Warp 9.9 for 12 hours, a ship can cross 1,814.4 light years relatively quickly.

2) Warp Speeds vary. This is true throughout the series. Not just TNG, but DS9 as well. It was said in Valiant, that the ship was supposed to make a complete circle of the UFP in just three months. As you yourself noted, the UFP is 8,000 LY in diameter (roughly). As in, the Valiant would be crossing 88.89 LY a day. Voyager's speed is roughly 2.74 LY a day. Notice the massive, massive variance there. It's over 32x faster than what Voyager, the supposed fastest ship, could do.

And that's not just that singular incident. In The Chase, the Enterprise D is racing all over the Alpha Quadrant, crossing tens of thousands of light years in just days, maybe weeks at most. And of course, there's also the TNG episode First Contact where the Enterprise travels at LEAST 2,000 LY in just six months (at most). Again, speeds far superior to Voyager. And that's just the TNG and DS9 series. TOS, tossing aside some of Kirk's ambigious quotes, has the Enterprise 1701 near the edge of the galaxy (no, not the first ship there either) and going to the outer edge of the galaxy's center in Star Trek V: Final Frontier.

What does this mean, well, it's suggested that Trek has sort of warp highways, where Warp becomes far more effective. Therefore, Warp factors only refer to a base speed, which can be higher or lower depending on the area. This accounts for all the confusion that we see with the warp speeds. It also explains how Voyager is able to shave off years of their journey with navigational data and why Earth accepted Vulcan's terms on the nagivational charts for Kronos. They are in fact, required for more effective FTL speeds.

So yes, if the UFP were to invade the Empire, it would take them around a century to make any real headway. However, this also means that while they're in familiar territory, that the UFP can move fast enough to respond to Imperial threats.
to cross only one quadrant of the Milky Way, which is smaller then the Star Wars galaxy!
They're both the same size--although evidence has been put forth of SW actually being smaller.
It would take Han Solo's good old Milllenium Falcon only one-three hours to cross the area of space crossed by the Voyager in seven years. Anyways, while it would take Federation vessels 53 weeks to cross all of the Federation space, it would only take a Star Wars vessel ten minutes-one hour.
That's pretty funny given that the Valiant was suggested to circulate all UFP territories in three months. And that would have to be at slower warp factors given that the Valiant was on a long term journey. Also, curious calculations given that with Voyager's stated speeds, it'd take years.

Also, as stated earlier in this thread, SW hyperdrive requires hyperlanes, which they haven't constructed in ST space. Do you know how fucked they are without those? Basically, in the Republic-Seperatist war, the Republic basically had to cowtow to the Hutt Clan because the Seperatists had mined all the lanes leading to the Outer Rim.

So yeah, FTL on both sides is crippled in the other's territory.

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: The Federation is weak

Post by Mike DiCenso » Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:03 pm

You're a bit late to the party on this one, Mith. Youngla's already been given the SFJN Smackdown. ;-)
-Mike

User avatar
Mith
Starship Captain
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:17 am

Re: The Federation is weak

Post by Mith » Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:13 pm

Mike DiCenso wrote:You're a bit late to the party on this one, Mith. Youngla's already been given the SFJN Smackdown. ;-)
-Mike
What is it with people and not inviting me to this stuff?>=(

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: The Federation is weak

Post by Mike DiCenso » Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:49 pm

It's self-invite, Mith.
-Mike

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: The Federation is weak

Post by Mike DiCenso » Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:56 pm

Mith wrote:1) Endurance. Ships moving at those speeds can only do so for short bursts. Maximum warp speeds are only sustainable for twelve hours at most.
Um, where does this 12 hour duration estimate come from? The only source I know of is from the non-canon TNG TM. In "The Chase" and "The Best of Both Worlds, Parts 1 & 2", the ship is able to maintain maximum warp for days on end.
-Mike

User avatar
Mith
Starship Captain
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:17 am

Re: The Federation is weak

Post by Mith » Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:04 pm

Mike DiCenso wrote:
Mith wrote:1) Endurance. Ships moving at those speeds can only do so for short bursts. Maximum warp speeds are only sustainable for twelve hours at most.
Um, where does this 12 hour duration estimate come from? The only source I know of is from the non-canon TNG TM. In "The Chase" and "The Best of Both Worlds, Parts 1 & 2", the ship is able to maintain maximum warp for days on end.
-Mike
Hmmm, perhaps I am thinking of the TMs. I had always assumed that 'max warp' was the maximum sustainable speeds.

Post Reply