Furlings and Ewoks are they related or what?

PunkMaister · Post by **PunkMaister** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:13 am

This is a question I've been itching to ask ever since the 200th episode aired I mean look:

So what do you think are they? Could the SW Ewoks be the 4th race!

stoneburner · Post by **stoneburner** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:30 pm

Oh look yet another bullshit punkmaister thread.

Mr. Oragahn · Post by **Mr. Oragahn** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:26 pm

stoneburner wrote:Oh look yet another bullshit punkmaister thread.

Seconded.
It's not even funny. RJLC, cut the crap please.

Praeothmin · Post by **Praeothmin** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:46 pm

Stoneburner wrote:Oh look yet another bullshit punkmaister thread.

If you don't think it's funny or worthwhile, just ignore it.
You don't need to act like an a** about it...

Mr. Oragahn · Post by **Mr. Oragahn** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 6:20 pm

Praeothmin wrote:
Stoneburner wrote:Oh look yet another bullshit punkmaister thread.
If you don't think it's funny or worthwhile, just ignore it.
You don't need to act like an a** about it...

He has the right to speak his mind. It then comes down to JMS' tolerance on this, really.
And yes, it's a bullshit thread.

Praeothmin · Post by **Praeothmin** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 6:52 pm

Oragahn wrote:He has the right to speak his mind.

If it's simply to be rude, and contribute to nothing worthwhile, then he can also just shut up, and ignore the thread.

And yes, it's a bullshit thread.

Then ignore it and go read something else.
Punkmaister probably thought it was funny, and that's why he posted it.
You have the right to think it's not funny, but there's no reason for you to be so rude.

PunkMaister · Post by **PunkMaister** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:29 pm

stoneburner wrote:Oh look yet another bullshit punkmaister thread.

Oh look another envoy from SDN...

ILikeDeathNote · Post by **ILikeDeathNote** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:04 pm

The only thing I'm going to add is that it was pretty clear to the Stargate producers themselves that the inclusion of the Furling species in the Stargate universe was a massive mistake, as they have only been seen very, very rarely (possibly just the one episode).

Not to mention, the costuming just looks cheap and unconvincing. Even Richard Dean Anderson himself seems less than bemused.

PunkMaister · Post by **PunkMaister** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:18 pm

ILikeDeathNote wrote:The only thing I'm going to add is that it was pretty clear to the Stargate producers themselves that the inclusion of the Furling species in the Stargate universe was a massive mistake, as they have only been seen very, very rarely (possibly just the one episode).

Not to mention, the costuming just looks cheap and unconvincing. Even Richard Dean Anderson himself seems less than bemused.

I think the whole point of the 200th episode was to be a joke and so it was with the look of the furlings but yes they did look cheap even for a joke.

Mr. Oragahn · Post by **Mr. Oragahn** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:33 pm

PunkMaister wrote:
ILikeDeathNote wrote:The only thing I'm going to add is that it was pretty clear to the Stargate producers themselves that the inclusion of the Furling species in the Stargate universe was a massive mistake, as they have only been seen very, very rarely (possibly just the one episode).

Not to mention, the costuming just looks cheap and unconvincing. Even Richard Dean Anderson himself seems less than bemused.
I think the whole point of the 200th episode was to be a joke and so it was with the look of the furlings but yes they did look cheap even for a joke.

*sigh*
It was a fucking minute-short joke.
They were not going to break budget for stupid suits.

ILikeDeathNote · Post by **ILikeDeathNote** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:36 pm

I have to admit, I never saw the episode. But since I have never seen the Furlings in subsequent episodes...I think I'll take Mr. Oragahn's statement :)

Airlocke_Jedi_Knight · Post by **Airlocke_Jedi_Knight** » Sat Feb 28, 2009 1:06 am

*reads thread and laughs* Yeah, that's it. That's all I got.

PunkMaister · Post by **PunkMaister** » Sat Feb 28, 2009 1:27 am

Airlocke_Jedi_Knight wrote:*reads thread and laughs* Yeah, that's it. That's all I got.

Well I'm glad you had fun because that's what the thread was about just to have a moment of fun and not to be taken seriously.

Airlocke_Jedi_Knight · Post by **Airlocke_Jedi_Knight** » Sat Feb 28, 2009 3:51 am

I think you misunderstand, I was laughing at all the bickering that seems to be ever present in threads where both you and Oragahn participate. Internet disputes amuse me.

Mr. Oragahn · Post by **Mr. Oragahn** » Sat Feb 28, 2009 4:02 am

Airlocke_Jedi_Knight wrote:I think you misunderstand, I was laughing at all the bickering that seems to be ever present in threads where both you and Oragahn participate. Internet disputes amuse me.

I grows yur pos' cownt.