I challenge darkstar to a debate

For polite and reasoned discussion of Star Wars and/or Star Trek.
Post Reply
User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: I challenge darkstar to a debate

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:20 pm

Admiral Breetai wrote:
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:
Fuck your "obvious". It was constructed in secret, the galaxy did not implode into poverty as a result of it.]
umm what? The Empire was so utterly crippled by the fiasco at Endor that merely the fall of Palpy and his gigantic space ball essentially destroyed it..it ceased to exist entirely in a matter of hours. so much so partying took place on the imperial capital where they threw down his statues

now the empire still had a navy and an army..yet it entirely ceased to exist in a single moment..obviously the DS construction so financially crippled them that simply mobilizing forces to put down riots was impossible

hell local imperial cops couldn't even be dispatched..and don't gimme that EU bullshit about the empire still existing and a decades long war to crush it..that's pure non canon and directly contradicts that scene
The EU claims that the riots were swiftly stopped.
It's possible that a rebel cell was waiting for any confirmation of a success of their mission and quickly threw the message on the local Coruscant facebook if you want, with most likely the clear intent of showing that the power was so weakened that such an event could happen. It's possible that they literally tried to make it look like a "happening" when it was most likely very ready since days or weeks.

KSW
Bridge Officer
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: I challenge darkstar to a debate

Post by KSW » Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:14 pm

Admiral Breetai wrote:
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:
Fuck your "obvious". It was constructed in secret, the galaxy did not implode into poverty as a result of it.]
umm what? The Empire was so utterly crippled by the fiasco at Endor that merely the fall of Palpy and his gigantic space ball essentially destroyed it..it ceased to exist entirely in a matter of hours. so much so partying took place on the imperial capital where they threw down his statues

now the empire still had a navy and an army..yet it entirely ceased to exist in a single moment..obviously the DS construction so financially crippled them that simply mobilizing forces to put down riots was impossible

hell local imperial cops couldn't even be dispatched..and don't gimme that EU bullshit about the empire still existing and a decades long war to crush it..that's pure non canon and directly contradicts that scene
To be fair, the Sith-lords WERE the empire.
Admiral Breetai wrote:
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:
A single Death Star 2 still outmasses the entire Federation fleet by trillions of times.
do you need windex to clean off your computer screen? maybe a few minutes alone to finish up after that one?
You're right-- that IS one hell of a wank!

Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: I challenge darkstar to a debate

Post by Admiral Breetai » Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:04 am

MauriceWindows wrote:
To be fair, the Sith-lords WERE the empire.
the Dark Crystal ending..only in space?

basically?
MauriceWindows wrote:

You're right-- that IS one hell of a wank!
I'd be worried about cleaning his room after were I his mom

User avatar
mojo
Starship Captain
Posts: 1159
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:47 am

Re: I challenge darkstar to a debate

Post by mojo » Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:39 am


Picard
Starship Captain
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: I challenge darkstar to a debate

Post by Picard » Thu Feb 09, 2012 6:45 am

Praeothmin wrote:
Picard wrote: However, it should be noted that, while Empire didn't seem to have any space stations aside for Death Stars, Starfleets space stations might make, as a wild guess, Starfleet's total tonnage two to twenty times greater.
But then you'd have to add the Empire's ships as well, so we'd be back at the same point...
His point was about Death Star, not about Imperial Fleet. But yes, you're correct about it. Still, main Imperial issue seems to be manpower; with Federation, probably fuel (antimatter). So I doubt either has anywhere close to number of ships they could have built if we look purely at industry.

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: I challenge darkstar to a debate

Post by Mike DiCenso » Thu Feb 09, 2012 6:45 pm

Sigh. I get back after a busy couple days and what do I find? This crap. All right, since you guys can't behave on your own for even a little while, I'm going to have to hand out warnings. Admiral Breetai, Mojo, and MauriceWindows each get a warning.
-Mike

Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: I challenge darkstar to a debate

Post by Admiral Breetai » Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:56 pm

Mike DiCenso wrote:Sigh. I get back after a busy couple days and what do I find? This crap. All right, since you guys can't behave on your own for even a little while, I'm going to have to hand out warnings. Admiral Breetai, Mojo, and MauriceWindows each get a warning.
-Mike
it was worth it SWST deserves as much emotional abuse as we can heap on him

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: I challenge darkstar to a debate

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:42 pm

Death Star II has diameter of 180 km.
??
The Death Star was the Empire's armored battle station, nearly twice as big as its predecessor, which Rebel forces had destroyed so many years before- nearly twice as big, but more than twice as powerful.
" The Deathstar, I think, will be a lot more interesting than the one in the first Star Wars — mainly because it is under construction ... Plus, it will be MUCH bigger. In Star Wars, it was really difficult to establish the scale. It was supposed to be miles in diameter, but with a full sphere it was hard to tell. The NEW one is SUPPOSED TO BE MORE like FIVE HUNDRED MILES in diameter, but since we're not dealing with a sphere all the time, we'll be able to establish landmarks and get a better sense of scale. "
Not that it really matters. Whether it's a 160 kilometer battle station in 2 years or a 900 kilometer battle station in 6 months, whether it was constructed with hardly a dent in the imperial budget or bankrupted it, the fact remains that it's more than the Federation could build in decades or even centuries of full scale production. Combined with the presence of trillions of crew and trillions of stormtroopers, there exists a logistical disparity far more lopsided than any war that has ever occured or reasonably could have occured in real life.

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: I challenge darkstar to a debate

Post by Praeothmin » Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:40 pm

SWST wrote:Whether it's a 160 kilometer battle station in 2 years or a 900 kilometer battle station in 6 months, whether it was constructed with hardly a dent in the imperial budget or bankrupted it, the fact remains that it's more than the Federation could build in decades or even centuries of full scale production.
Prove it!
With Math, not your wank...

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: I challenge darkstar to a debate

Post by Mike DiCenso » Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:09 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:Not that it really matters. Whether it's a 160 kilometer battle station in 2 years or a 900 kilometer battle station in 6 months, whether it was constructed with hardly a dent in the imperial budget or bankrupted it, the fact remains that it's more than the Federation could build in decades or even centuries of full scale production. Combined with the presence of trillions of crew and trillions of stormtroopers, there exists a logistical disparity far more lopsided than any war that has ever occurred or reasonably could have occurred in real life.
Nice of you to pull the CINEFEX quote out of context there, SWST. Mr. Oragahn and others have provided the actual, full interview from CINEFEX that puts the 500 mile (800 km) Death Star 2 quote into perspective.

Effectively Edlund didn't even know what the final size of the battlestation was going to be and from his statements about the first Death Star being mere "miles in diameter" in size shows the reliability of a guy who just got on-board and no FX team had been assembled says a great deal.

Robert Anderson and Gary Sarli have [url=http://www.st-v%20sw.net/STSWdeathstarsizes.html]debunked Saxton's scalings[/url] by showing just how erroneous his assumptions were.

Furthermore, I'm looking at giving you another warning for repeating the same, low-canon garbage that is clearly contradicted by the movies, their novelizations, and the TCW. There are no trillions of Storm troopers anywhere, and 5 million Clone troopers was enough to bankrupt the Republic as per TCW "Heroes and Villains". You can't afford trillions, if you can't afford millions. As Praeothimin noted, you can't even show the math or anything else, and all too often you rely on other peoples' flawed work. You've never even have demonstrated that any serious disparity exists.
-Mike

User avatar
mojo
Starship Captain
Posts: 1159
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:47 am

Re: I challenge darkstar to a debate

Post by mojo » Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:07 am

you're getting out of hand, mike. as someone who eagerly follows swst's posts, it is becoming increasingly obvious that you're beginning to blame him for things like providing evidence he's never provided before and has never been warned about before. LIKE THIS.

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: I challenge darkstar to a debate

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Sat Feb 11, 2012 1:59 pm

As per one of the WEG sourcebooks, it's said that the very Imperial Star Destroyer project brought the Empire on the verge of collapse. Same with the Executor. Plus Tarkin suggesting in a personal note to Palpatine that transceivers around the galaxy should be cannibalized.
We have the fresh Strong Economy? thread. Because it's important to know what was the real strain on the Empire's resources.

So, although the total industrial production of SW is superior, things are easily put into perspective.

We also know that pound for pound, military wise, ST ships are above SW ships, be it in terms of firepower or range, and there's a strong possibility that phasers could pass through shields unhampered (1, 2).

And yes, thank you Mike for linking to my thread, at least it proves useful. Saxton dishonestly sacred the CINEFEX quotation as the be and end all piece of evidence for his arguments, but it never had such definitive value in reality.
Last edited by Mr. Oragahn on Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

Picard
Starship Captain
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: I challenge darkstar to a debate

Post by Picard » Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:50 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:??
Visuals.

And your first quote may refer to volume or to diameter. Second is probably from some non-canon novel, so...
Combined with the presence of trillions of crew and trillions of stormtroopers, there exists a logistical disparity far more lopsided than any war that has ever occured or reasonably could have occured in real life.
And you know Empire has it from where...?
http://picard578.hostoi.com/startrek-vs ... itary.html
http://picard578.hostoi.com/startrek-vs ... itory.html

Several billions, maybe. Which would be 10:1 at best.

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: I challenge darkstar to a debate

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:43 am

Picard wrote:
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:??
Visuals.

And your first quote may refer to volume or to diameter. Second is probably from some non-canon novel, so...
Combined with the presence of trillions of crew and trillions of stormtroopers, there exists a logistical disparity far more lopsided than any war that has ever occured or reasonably could have occured in real life.
And you know Empire has it from where...?
http://picard578.hostoi.com/startrek-vs ... itary.html
http://picard578.hostoi.com/startrek-vs ... itory.html

Several billions, maybe. Which would be 10:1 at best.
Pic, what point are you trying to get across with that territory page of yours, exactly?
Last time, I objected to your power and firepower calculations as I found them ludicrous. I didn't believe I needed to explain why, since I think it was fairly obvious, so I didn't continue. Are you really thinking one can take your work seriously after claiming that the galaxy is 40 LY wide only?
All that based on some fancy placement of the Rishi maze...

ANH:
HAN: It's the ship that made the Kessel run in less than twelve
parsecs!


AOTC:
DEXTER JETTSTER: No, it's beyond the Outer Rim. I'd say
about twelve parsecs outside the Rishi Maze, toward the
south. It should be easy to find, even for those droids in
your archive. These Kaminoans keep to themselves. They're
cloners. Damned good ones, too.

PADMÉ: They'll never get there in time to save him. They
have to come halfway across the galaxy. Look, Geonosis is
less than a parsec away.


Do you know that planets in two different systems are certainly, at the very least, separated by more than ten light years?

KSW
Bridge Officer
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: I challenge darkstar to a debate

Post by KSW » Sun Feb 12, 2012 8:00 pm

Admiral Breetai wrote:
MauriceWindows wrote:
To be fair, the Sith-lords WERE the empire.
the Dark Crystal ending..only in space?
Well they were using Sith-powers to stay in power and to keep the Senate from re-grouping; they were the ones behind the Rebellion.
Once they were gone, the Republic would re-form. The Empire didn't have enough forces to coerce that many worlds, that's why they needed the Death Star.
MauriceWindows wrote:
You're right-- that IS one hell of a wank!

I'd be worried about cleaning his room after were I his mom
I'm sure she never cleans that room in the basement.

Post Reply