http://www.starfleetjedi.net/forum/view ... f=8&t=1976
Only problem I had there was time to actually think about your crap, and my unfamiliarity with EU. And gee, when I checked, it turned out that I was correct.1. Picard decides to debate BDZ
2. Picard brings up Dankayo as evidence, referencing it as something that fits with canon and using it to support his side
3. I point out that Dankayo has 3 ISD's blowing off the atmosphere of a planet
4. Picard claims that it was only the base's atmopshere
5. I rebute this
6. Picard backtracks and claims that Dankayo is just an airless moon, when he could have taken a minute to search it up on wookieepedia
7. I rebute this
8. Picard says this:
"So we have a contradiction with canon"
And later claims that the feat was using some sort of technobabble atmosphere ripping invention.
Which then brings up the question as to why he brought up the quote in the first place if he thinks that it's an unquantifiable chain reaction AND that it's contradicting canon.
The obvious answer is that Picard misjudged his quote, but he has yet to admit this, contrary to what you claim.
And now let me correct you:
1) I only debated EU in ICS thread. Not here.
4 and 6) I was going with what is possible to conclude from quote, since I know next-to-nothing about EU, and do not want to expend time on Wookiepedia, which is one of more silly wikis on internet
8) Yes, I thought that, beacouse I did not check it properly
And while you might have entire day to spew BS, I usually don't have even tenth of that.
Beacouse based survived. And yes, it does support my side, beacouse if it is technobabble, it is not DET. And it can't be anything else than technobabble, with described effects.If it's technobabble, why did YOU bring it up as evidence to support YOUR side?