Mr. Oragahn vs me

For polite and reasoned discussion of Star Wars and/or Star Trek.
User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Mr. Oragahn vs me

Post by Praeothmin » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:00 pm

SWST wrote:3. I point out that Dankayo has 3 ISD's blowing off the atmosphere of a planet
Wasn't there someone who left Dankayo's base after the attack and walked on the surface?
Also, how could Tie fighters perform "mop up" operations if the ships performed a melting of the planet's entire surface?

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Mr. Oragahn vs me

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:23 pm

Praeothmin wrote:
SWST wrote:3. I point out that Dankayo has 3 ISD's blowing off the atmosphere of a planet
Wasn't there someone who left Dankayo's base after the attack and walked on the surface?
Also, how could Tie fighters perform "mop up" operations if the ships performed a melting of the planet's entire surface?
That someone was in a "deep planetary shelter", which Picard thinks is 100 meters below the ground, and he still feared for his life.

Mop up operations, again, would be to catch those that survived, probably under those "deep planetary shelters".

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: Mr. Oragahn vs me

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:59 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:
Pic knows how to debate. I don't agree with his figures but he knows how to behave and read other people's posts and their evidence, and can admit being wrong when it's time to.
1. Picard decides to debate BDZ
2. Picard brings up Dankayo as evidence, referencing it as something that fits with canon and using it to support his side
3. I point out that Dankayo has 3 ISD's blowing off the atmosphere of a planet
4. Picard claims that it was only the base's atmopshere
5. I rebute this
6. Picard backtracks and claims that Dankayo is just an airless moon, when he could have taken a minute to search it up on wookieepedia
7. I rebute this
8. Picard says this:

"So we have a contradiction with canon"

And later claims that the feat was using some sort of technobabble atmosphere ripping invention.

Which then brings up the question as to why he brought up the quote in the first place if he thinks that it's an unquantifiable chain reaction AND that it's contradicting canon.

The obvious answer is that Picard misjudged his quote, but he has yet to admit this, contrary to what you claim.
Can't care. I didn't debate Pic, it's his problem. I didn't have any problem with him thus far... aside from his silly figures! ;)

This is not about Pic. It's about me and you.
Or more like you you you you you.
So you can go take your unsupported accusations of trolling and stick it up your ass. That, or provide proof that I am, which does not involve a one word "done".
Done.

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Mr. Oragahn vs me

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Fri Jun 17, 2011 10:06 pm

Done.
This is trolling. Answering requests for evidence with "done", as though the post that asks for evidence is somehow evidence of trolling.

Uh huh.

You could at least just debate my points and drop your trolling accusation, because you obviously have little way to prove it, and obviously have no idea what trolling actually is.

What's stupid is that when Breetai refuses to provide links, aka evidence, your response is not to tell him that you're supposed to provide evidence in a debate, it's to say that he should so that I won't have an excuse. Have you ever considered the possibility that my excuse w/Breetai is COMPLETELY VALID since he has, as you know, refused to post links?

Is that not the very definition of trolling?

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: Mr. Oragahn vs me

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:46 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:
Done.
This is trolling. Answering requests for evidence with "done", as though the post that asks for evidence is somehow evidence of trolling.

Uh huh.

You could at least just debate my points and drop your trolling accusation, because you obviously have little way to prove it, and obviously have no idea what trolling actually is.

What's stupid is that when Breetai refuses to provide links, aka evidence, your response is not to tell him that you're supposed to provide evidence in a debate, it's to say that he should so that I won't have an excuse. Have you ever considered the possibility that my excuse w/Breetai is COMPLETELY VALID since he has, as you know, refused to post links?

Is that not the very definition of trolling?
Now undone.
Just in case you don't remember, that "Me vs u". Not "Breetai vs u vs us vs them vs I couldn't care less".

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: Mr. Oragahn vs me

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:50 pm

Praeothmin wrote:
SWST wrote:3. I point out that Dankayo has 3 ISD's blowing off the atmosphere of a planet
Wasn't there someone who left Dankayo's base after the attack and walked on the surface?
Also, how could Tie fighters perform "mop up" operations if the ships performed a melting of the planet's entire surface?
Damn, Praeoth.
Why did you catch the bait? :)
We have a thread for BDZ, and Dankayo is a closed case.
Seriously, let's see that stupid thread closed.

Post Reply