General Warning Tally for users...

[Admiral Breetai]

you don´t know how toi read?

seeing as I quoted feats for the character her peers and a few others in that very thread no less...my refusal to basically repost what was already there when Mister O asked for it...on the very same page or the one before..is certainly justifiable

I mean I only..friggen scoured four or five books and slapped up a bunch of different passages...right there..in that friggen thread when another poster asked for it

hence my retort to you..because evidently your so preoccupied with beating me (and failing at that) that you basically don't even read the thread and blindly attack

[StarWarsStarTrek]

seeing as I quoted feats for the character her peers and a few others in that very thread no less...my refusal to basically repost what was already there when Mister O asked for it...on the very same page or the one before..is certainly justifiable

I mean I only..friggen scoured four or five books and slapped up a bunch of different passages...right there..in that friggen thread when another poster asked for it

hence my retort to you..because evidently your so preoccupied with beating me (and failing at that) that you basically don't even read the thread and blindly attack

If that were true, you should have specified so, instead of simply making a vague comment and expecting me to understand that.

Moreso, that does not explain why you think that we already discussed Jedi precog abilities when...we didn't!

[Admiral Breetai]

[

If that were true, you should have specified so, instead of simply making a vague comment and expecting me to understand that.[

are you so unwilling to even register another persons argument that you don't even look through a thread? why should I have to specify something you should already know to do

[

Moreso, that does not explain why you think that we already discussed Jedi precog abilities when...we didn't!

yes we have many times on this board and the other..when I bothered posting there any ways it got nowhere with you

[Praeothmin]

Moreso, that does not explain why you think that we already discussed Jedi precog abilities when...we didn't!

But I did, in the Jedi vs LOTR thread...
But you ignored my examples...

[StarWarsStarTrek]

Moreso, that does not explain why you think that we already discussed Jedi precog abilities when...we didn't!

But I did, in the Jedi vs LOTR thread...
But you ignored my examples...

Red herring. We discussed it after Breetai claimed that we did. BTW, DE Sidious is more powerful than ROTS Sidious, so your point is moot.



Did you even read the large compliation of Breetai doing exactly what you accuse me of, only to a greater extent; actually REFUSING to answer points, instead of not seeing them or not having time to read them.

Please explain why you have no problem with Breetai saying "do you know how to read" and "you know" in respond to direct requests for evidence?

[Admiral Breetai]

what the hell are you talking about? i already explained it in that very thread! we went over that on this very topic and you go and ignore it again!

good lord your trolltastic

[Praeothmin]

We discussed it after Breetai claimed that we did. BTW, DE Sidious is more powerful than ROTS Sidious, so your point is moot.

Never proven, and my points were still ignored...

Please explain why you have no problem with Breetai saying "do you know how to read" and "you know" in respond to direct requests for evidence?

Because Breetai doesn't ignore arguments who are backed up by evidence, and he respects requests for evidence when requested by posters who don't ignore evidence presented, and don't go around in other threads reposting the same bullshit...

[StarWarsStarTrek]

Never proven, and my points were still ignored...

1. This has nothing to do with what I'm saying

2. Your points were ignored because I never disagreed with them. I never claimed that ROTS Sidious could replicate DE Sidious's feats.

Because Breetai doesn't ignore arguments who are backed up by evidence,

Literal quote from breetai:

it's from Wong that automatically invalidates it

So much for not ignoring evidence!

and he respects requests for evidence when requested by posters who don't ignore evidence presented, and don't go around in other threads reposting the same bullshit...

Name one example where I flat out refuse to give evidence.

Also, your illogical and unsupported criticism of me (really? why don't you give links and evidence?) have nothing to do with my problem with breetai. These are two totally different complaints:

Breetai makes X claim, I ask for proof of X, and he flat out refuses. I often times give quotes and links to support my quotes.



It's also a red herring that breetai should judge whether he respects requests for evidence by the person making the request; a request for evidence is a decent request that he should comply to in a debate regardless of who he's debating.



See how I'm using logic to explain my position, and you use:

red herrings (using my conduct as being relevant to breetai's conduct)
double standards (saying that breetai can choose to not post evidence because...)
ad hominems (saying that breetai can ignore request for evidence because...)

to support your position?

[Admiral Breetai]

1. This has nothing to do with what I'm saying]

no it has everything to do with why your in deep shit

So much for not ignoring evidence!

and then i went and explained exactly why I reject those calcs..you know this since you created a tempertantrum thread in which every one pointed out to you..nearly universally why my position while harsh isn't against the rules

chiefly his calcs have been proven time and time again to be biased

oh and it's also worth pointing out your guilty of a deliberate distortion again here..more rule breaking as not only was i told to chill with that but both preao and mike warned me so..yeah no..your completely fucking lying here I got taken to the chopping block for that

liar

Name one example where I flat out refuse to give evidence.

your absolute refusal to address my comments regarding force powers in one thread your in ability to actually specify what episode of voyager and other such things..for one

I'm sure Kor and O have a long list of your refusals

Also, your illogical and unsupported criticism of me (really? why don't you give links and evidence?) have nothing to do with my problem with breetai. These are two totally different complaints:

what your not understanding is that your little drama with me is irrelevant your misconduct is so severe it's prompted people to stop posting on this forum...others to loose it on you..and others to just cease debating all together and merely copy paste links to prior rebutalls or your guilt

basically your a danger to the forum and that's what all this is about..not me..and not my issues..your constant breaking of the rules and harassing members

Breetai makes X claim, I ask for proof of X, and he flat out refuses. I often times give quotes and links to support my quotes.

after repeatedly making detailed explanations that you ignore

It's also a red herring that breetai should judge whether he respects requests for evidence by the person making the request; a request for evidence is a decent request that he should comply to in a debate regardless of who he's debating.

I like this double standard "I'm gonna provide nothing substantiate nothing and keep repeating the same crap and run from peoples posts but when I ask for evidence well it damn well better be provided!"

no..get this threw your head when you bullshit and do what you do none of us are under any obligation to indulge you..the entire board can put your ass on ignore and call it a day..or just flame the fuck out of you until you leave (though they wont do this because they're too nice and JMS..defending you..is a corruption of the rules from on high)

you deserve nothing less because you have never at any point in your career ever ever backed anything up..provided anything nor ceased ignoring posts...

I mean christ all mighty to the extent that you do not read a prior page and then accuse me of dodging for heavens sake

See how I'm using logic to explain my position, and you use:

red herrings (using my conduct as being relevant to breetai's conduct)

it is irrelevant I'm not guilty of any misconduct in the form dishonesty and ignoring evidence..where as the entire month long shit storm that's happened is specifically because of you

double standards (saying that breetai can choose to not post evidence because...)

this isn't just me so get over me your obsession with me is getting juvinile many posters are now so sick of your ignoring evidence they either outright refuse to or walk away or copy paste

ad hominems (saying that breetai can ignore request for evidence because...)

I always wondered why DOW's used that word Ad hominem and always incorrectly too it's like they think it makes them sound refined

to support your position?

no he's using something else something logical something trolls tend not to comprehend

[StarWarsStarTrek]

How about this:

SHOW ME EVIDENCE that we had already discussed Jedi pre cog PRIOR to you claiming that we "already have".

[Admiral Breetai]

How about this:

SHOW ME EVIDENCE that we had already discussed Jedi pre cog PRIOR to you claiming that we "already have".

I did you ignored it

[StarWarsStarTrek]

I did you ignored it

No, THE VERY NEXT POST YOU MADE after you made the claim was:

you know

The sequence of events was:

1. You made a claim
2. In the very next post, I ask for evidence
3. In the very next post, you say "you know"

Nowhere is there room for you to have posted evidence. Please be honest and post the evidence, even if you feel like you already have.

[Admiral Breetai]

no I provided proof to the capabilities of the characters I responded to your BS about precog both in thread and all around

I'm not going to do it again I'm not under any obligation to repeat myself constantly

[Mr. Oragahn]

You know, Breetai, although we're dealing with a troll in my opinion, it would honestly be better if you could provide a short post that proves your point with links. There won't be any denial possible after that, even if SWST claims that it's all lies and that he did behave.

[Praeothmin]

You know, Breetai, although we're dealing with a troll in my opinion, it would honestly be better if you could provide a short post that proves your point with links. There won't be any denial possible after that, even if SWST claims that it's all lies and that he did behave.

Yup, would be easier...