I'm opposed to those extreme yields because they're mainly fueled by that absurd wank race, led by those same people who would like to see a relatively mainstream show like Stargate compete with a certain (absurd) vision of Star Wars, since Star Trek seems to be agonizing on the side of the road for the moment, and come with equally phalic numbers to see who's got the biggest.l33telboi wrote:Why exactly are you so opposed to them being teraton bombs anyway?Mr. Oragahn wrote:- Which as a Stargate related side note, makes me giggle when I hear people claim teraton yields for the gatebusters in First Strike. -
F34R t3h beag troutaton nUK3zoRz!!!11!11!1!1!
I think that a 812 GT warhead is quite already big enough for a missile of the size of a sidewinder or even smaller, especially since I consider that nothing in Star Wars ever came close to such a yield for a projectile of that size.
I mean, do they realize that it means that a big squadron of F-302, each fighter equipped with four of those god awful things, could already waste the surface of a planet on their own?
That should be enough for any war crazy, and yet, we need to jump around with teraton flags n' banners otherwise we're sissies or som'thing like that, because gigatons is not big enough?
Sheesh.
The question is, how could you distinguish anything fueling the initial explosion from the middle, in a fireball that's alerady going to be several tens of kilometers wide (812 GT)?Secondary explosions caused by other things in the area? I suppose it could be, but the explosions didn't look like they were caused by several smaller ones, they just look like one big boom. And there were six of these booms, all equally big.
Wouldn't it require quite the extraordinary set of events for these explosions to all look exactly identical, if they were all caused by secondary explosions?
Answer: You couldn't.
Considering that all targets were roughly of the same nature and numbers, it even the odds even more.
We're talking about advanced spaceships (which looked almost finished, externally wise at least) and drydocks down there, run by machines and powered by god knows what sort of energy and raw materials.
Plus a change of yield would actually warrant a name change, or a mark designation, like Mark 9-B for example. Then maybe, I could eventually accept it. But if we're still talking about the same gatebuster, then I have no reason to doubt a yield explicitely stated to be able to vaporize stuff over 100 miles on the ground.
Considering that Cameron even said they had more of those, it's not far fetched that the SGC may have even run a test, somewhere in that galaxy, before using it as a tactical weapon. They actually had time to plan and develop that weapon, contrary to the end of the first season.
It's clear that the teraton claims based on Beach Head were completely out there, for several reasons I listed at GW.And though the initial "Beachhead" example was a bit funky, what with the shield over the planet and all, it did look like the explosion there meshed well with what we saw here.
Plus even if the fireball reaches the upper atmosphere, and thus finds little pressure to keep the top (of the fireball) incandescent, the things still look like they cooled down too fast.