Fed hand weapons against any armour what so ever

For polite and reasoned discussion of Star Wars and/or Star Trek.
Picard
Starship Captain
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Fed hand weapons against any armour what so ever

Post by Picard » Thu May 26, 2011 9:45 pm

But kills them. Meaning it can bypass uniform, at least in your logic. Meaning armor penetration quality is irrelevant. Even if we ignore numerous heat-rocks-till-they-glow incidents. And as said, thread necromancy (replying in a thread older than 1 month) is generally avoided, althought I was quite necromancer myself.

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: Fed hand weapons against any armour what so ever

Post by Mike DiCenso » Thu May 26, 2011 10:06 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:In Star Trek Voyager: Deadlock, phaser beams hitting unarmored redshirts do not even penetrate the red uniforms of the targets.
Could you please describe the circumstances behind this? Was the intention to kill "redshirts", or stun them? As I recall in that particular episode, the Vidians board one of the two Voyagers, and the stun several crew members so that they can harvest the organs. It makes no sense for them to use a weapon on kill that will disrupt or otherwise risk ruining the very tissue and organs they seek to use, now doesn't it?

However, we have seen multiple times phasers burn through someone, or leave serious burns on their bodies, like this poor chap below in the series of images from "A Message in a Bottle":

http://voy.trekcore.com/gallery/albums/ ... le_088.jpg

So, would you like to provide a little more context there, SWST?
-Mike

User avatar
Trinoya
Security Officer
Posts: 658
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:35 am

Re: Fed hand weapons against any armour what so ever

Post by Trinoya » Thu May 26, 2011 11:47 pm

Lets not forget the Takaran in TNG: "Suspicions" who had a hole litterally burned through him, and then was subsequently vaporized on the second shot.

Post Reply