It was taken from Wong's site, if I'm not W(r)ong. But regardless, it has same bullsh** assumptions as Wong's site, so no difference.StarWarsStarTrek wrote:The calculation I cited involving half a kiloton was made by a spacebattles member, not Wong, who indeed was flabbergasted by the result.
Out of the universe explanation: Wong, and, consequently, you, make bull**** assumptions due to either lack of knowledge (composition of star, in this case) or heavy (neutronium-heavy) bias. Choose.Out of universe explanation: The authors of Star Trek overestimate the power of pulsars and other celestial bodies, instead having Data sprout bullshit without bothering to think of the implications.
Non-canon.here:
Non-canon.A Base Delta Zero
Pure BS.involves the turning of the upper surface of a planet into molten slag.
http://picard578.blogspot.com/2010/10/e ... -zero.html
Old work, but quite sufficient.
I am one of people who don't accept TDiC event as DET, so I don't see point here.The visuals clearly refute this, as 30% of the planet's crust has not been destroyed, nor have effects one would expect from such an event been witnessed when they should have been.