The Pegasus Redux

For polite and reasoned discussion of Star Wars and/or Star Trek.
Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

The Pegasus Redux

Post by Mike DiCenso » Wed May 18, 2011 7:43 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:Oh, were they? Is that why it took the entire photon torpedo payload of the Enterprise to consider destroying a 10 km asteroid?
No, according to Riker, it would "take most of our photon torpedoes". Most of is a rather vague statement, and only means that some majority of the photon torpedoes are required. Given that it is established clearly in "Conundrum" that the E-D carries 250 torpedoes, a majority of that number could be anywhere from 150 to 249. Even then, the effects of each of the torpedoes at minimum are in the low single-digit megaton range (shattering only) , while on the upper end of the scale in the low gigatons (mostly melted), to over one hundred gigatons (total or near-total vaporization).
-Mike

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Base Delta Zero

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Wed May 18, 2011 7:51 pm

Mike DiCenso wrote:
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:Oh, were they? Is that why it took the entire photon torpedo payload of the Enterprise to consider destroying a 10 km asteroid?
No, according to Riker, it would "take most of our photon torpedoes". Most of is a rather vague statement, and only means that some majority of the photon torpedoes are required. Given that it is established clearly in "Conundrum" that the E-D carries 250 torpedoes, a majority of that number could be anywhere from 150 to 249. Even then, the effects of each of the torpedoes at minimum are in the low single-digit megaton range (shattering only) , while on the upper end of the scale in the low gigatons (mostly melted), to over one hundred gigatons (total or near-total vaporization).
-Mike
I notice something, a nitpick: Data states that the Pegasus was pulled in by the "gravitational field" of a 5km asteroid. Does anyone else find that strange? A 5km asteroid would have no noticeable gravitational field.

There is no reason to assume melting or vaporization, because said actions would be a waste of resources in the context of what they were trying to do. Why would they need to vaporize the asteroid? Why would Riker suggest vaporization when it would waste more photon torpedos, when simple shattering accomplishes the mission with less?

The asteroid is 5 to 10 km in length, meaning that "most"; 75%, perhaps, of the Enterprise's payload would mean that each photon torpedo would be anywhere from 600 kilotons to 5 megatons.

Conveniently enough, these happen to fit very well with the 30 megaton Relic calculation. What a coincidence! But oh, this isn't taking into account the fact that the asteroid was mostly hollow, doesn't it?

Moreso, when the Romulans destroyed the entrance to the chasm, the Enterprise was sealed in; they could not get out, could not put on their shields and ram through, or vaporize the blockading rocks. Well, they suggested doing it, but apparently a collapsing chasm would be lethal to the Enterprise.

Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Base Delta Zero

Post by Admiral Breetai » Wed May 18, 2011 8:09 pm

Kor_Dahar_Master wrote:
You mean apart from grevious flagship and a bunch of other ships in the fight at the start of ROTS.
just to add to this it was unshielded fired directly into the gun port right into the cabin and smashed into an ammo case for what ever power source the turbo lasers use and caused that to explode...

and all we got was a section of the ship getting all messed up and them temporarily loosing steering and power to the engines...you'd think if a Gigaton explosion went off and triggered many more multi GT booms in a atmosphere environment (inside the ship) the destruction would of well massive more than sufficient to completely vaporize the invisible hand and likely damage surrounding ships

yet we see none of this..it really is one of the most damning pieces of evidence kor and I don't know about you man but I always find it over looked

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Base Delta Zero

Post by Praeothmin » Wed May 18, 2011 8:12 pm

SWST wrote:There is no reason to assume melting or vaporization, because said actions would be a waste of resources in the context of what they were trying to do. Why would they need to vaporize the asteroid? Why would Riker suggest vaporization when it would waste more photon torpedos, when simple shattering accomplishes the mission with less?
And that is the cherry picking and ignoring of context we keep mentioning.
The goal of the asteroid's destruction was to keep the Romulans from getting their hand on that cloaking device.
You think fragmenting the asteroid in 10 meter chunks would do that?
Even taking into consideration the fact the claoking device was less than 2 meters long, and not even a meter wide?
Yeah, right...

Oh, and where does your "asteroid is mostly hollow" information come from?

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: Base Delta Zero

Post by Mike DiCenso » Wed May 18, 2011 8:36 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote: I notice something, a nitpick: Data states that the Pegasus was pulled in by the "gravitational field" of a 5km asteroid. Does anyone else find that strange? A 5km asteroid would have no noticeable gravitational field.
A 9 x 6.5 km asteroid, and that's being rather conservative. It is possible, even for asteroids to do that over time, which is why the United States and Japan have both been able to orbit spacecraft around asteroids as well as to land on them.

What is strange is that the Gamma 601 asteroid could produce magnetic fields and gravitational fluctuations which could aversely affect shuttlecraft and the E-D herself, which is bizarre since the E-D as well as several embarked types of craft have had little trouble in the past dealing with being close in to stars as well as neutron stars and black holes. They've even routinely flown in and out of atmospheres of terrestrial sized planets with no trouble at all.

So that asteroid is not normal and you wind up with having to consider that any calculations derived from it are either totally worthless, or they will wind up being horribly conservative.
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:There is no reason to assume melting or vaporization, because said actions would be a waste of resources in the context of what they were trying to do. Why would they need to vaporize the asteroid? Why would Riker suggest vaporization when it would waste more photon torpedos, when simple shattering accomplishes the mission with less?

The asteroid is 5 to 10 km in length, meaning that "most"; 75%, perhaps, of the Enterprise's payload would mean that each photon torpedo would be anywhere from 600 kilotons to 5 megatons.

Conveniently enough, these happen to fit very well with the 30 megaton Relic calculation. What a coincidence! But oh, this isn't taking into account the fact that the asteroid was mostly hollow, doesn't it?
No, it does not, and shows how little you know about the episode and the events involved. Thirty megaton shields would easily handle about 10 such photon torpedoes, actually 20 since half the energies are lost to space in an omni-directional explosion. However, we know from "To the Nth Degree" that full-yeild torpedoes in a spread of just four such torpedoes can take out the shields of the E-D. Four divided by 30 = 7.5 megatons, not .6 to 5 megatons.

As for the vaporization verus shattering issue, look at what Riker wanted. Shattering the asteroid into 10 meter pieces wouldn't do them any good since it would also leave huge pieces of the Pegasus herself behind for the Romulans to pick over afterwords, not too mention the energy of blasting like that would send the pieces flying all over the place where anyone could get their hands on the critical technologies they contained. So shattering is right out, so that leaves only melting and or vaporization. From episodes like "Booby Trap" and "Rise", vaporization of large asteroids in the 60 to 400 meter range is perfectly doable. When it does happen, as was the case in "Rise", it starts a major investigation, which in "Rise" leads the crew of Voyager discovering an asteroid they'd targeted for vaporization earlier in the episode was actually an artifical construct designed to resist such efforts.
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: Moreso, when the Romulans destroyed the entrance to the chasm, the Enterprise was sealed in; they could not get out, could not put on their shields and ram through, or vaporize the blockading rocks.
Again, you display your ignorance, be it intentional or otherwise. The E-D would have had to slam through a billion cubic meters of molten rock to get out. Furhermore Worf suggests using phasers to cut their way out, but Data nixes the idea, not because it is impossible for the phasers, but because the drilling action would cause the entire fissure they were inside to collapse:

PRESSMAN: We can't do it. If we abandon the Enterprise they'll come back here and get their hands on both ships.

PICARD: Agreed. Options?

WORF: Captain, I believe we could use the phasers to cut our way out.

DATA: The asteroid's internal structure is highly unstable. Any attempt to cut through the rock could cause the entire chasm to collapse.

RIKER: Captain, I have a suggestion. There's a piece of equipment in Admiral Pressman's quarters under guard which might get us out of here. It's a prototype for a Federation cloaking device.


Furthermore, you keep endless repeating that the asteroid was hollow, yet to do so means you have ignored calculations which show that the volcanic fissues only make up less than 1 percent of the total volume of the asteroid.

Not to mention, you also fail to realize the signficance of the warbird's melting of a billion cubic meters of rock in just a few seconds! That's the equivalent of melting an spherical asteroid of 1,250 m diameter! Or to put it another way, the warbird unleashed 1.5 gigatons of energy in just a three seconds or 500 megatons each second.
-Mike

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: Base Delta Zero

Post by Mike DiCenso » Wed May 18, 2011 8:54 pm

Praeothmin wrote:
SWST wrote:There is no reason to assume melting or vaporization, because said actions would be a waste of resources in the context of what they were trying to do. Why would they need to vaporize the asteroid? Why would Riker suggest vaporization when it would waste more photon torpedos, when simple shattering accomplishes the mission with less?
And that is the cherry picking and ignoring of context we keep mentioning.
The goal of the asteroid's destruction was to keep the Romulans from getting their hand on that cloaking device.
You think fragmenting the asteroid in 10 meter chunks would do that?
Even taking into consideration the fact the claoking device was less than 2 meters long, and not even a meter wide?
Yeah, right...

Oh, and where does your "asteroid is mostly hollow" information come from?
The other goal of Riker's was to keep Admiral Pressman from obtaining the phase cloak.
So he could not afford any chance of large chunks of the Pegasus surviving in any form.

As for the mostly hollow fallacy, Wong and SDN have pushed that for years and years now without any calculations to justify it.
-Mike

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Base Delta Zero

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Wed May 18, 2011 9:08 pm

Mike DiCenso wrote:
A 9 x 6.5 km asteroid, and that's being rather conservative. It is possible, even for asteroids to do that over time, which is why the United States and Japan have both been able to orbit spacecraft around asteroids as well as to land on them.
Over time? Over what time? It would take a very, very long time for a 5-10 km asteroid to drag in an Enterprise sized ship.
What is strange is that the Gamma 601 asteroid could produce magnetic fields and gravitational fluctuations which could aversely affect shuttlecraft and the E-D herself, which is bizarre since the E-D as well as several embarked types of craft have had little trouble in the past dealing with being close in to stars as well as neutron stars and black holes. They've even routinely flown in and out of atmospheres of terrestrial sized planets with no trouble at all.

So that asteroid is not normal and you wind up with having to consider that any calculations derived from it are either totally worthless, or they will wind up being horribly conservative.
No, not really; the asteroid having unusual magnetic properties has nothing to do with its durability.


No, it does not, and shows how little you know about the episode and the events involved. Thirty megaton shields would easily handle about 10 such photon torpedoes, actually 20 since half the energies are lost to space in an omni-directional explosion. However, we know from "To the Nth Degree" that full-yeild torpedoes in a spread of just four such torpedoes can take out the shields of the E-D. Four divided by 30 = 7.5 megatons, not .6 to 5 megatons.
The 30 megatons were over a course of several hours. Said photon torpedos were in quick succession.

7.5 megatons and 6 megatons are very close for fan calculations.
As for the vaporization verus shattering issue, look at what Riker wanted. Shattering the asteroid into 10 meter pieces wouldn't do them any good since it would also leave huge pieces of the Pegasus herself behind for the Romulans to pick over afterwords, not too mention the energy of blasting like that would send the pieces flying all over the place where anyone could get their hands on the critical technologies they contained.
You would think, then that Riker would go out of his way to specify vaporization to Picard, so as to not screw up via miscommunication, wouldn't he?

As for shattering destroying the Pegasus, you would be conceding that the energy needed to destroy said asteroid by shattering; 250 to 1000 megatons, would be enough to take out an unshielded Pegasus, even though only a miniscule portion of said energy would actually be directed at wherever the Pegasus would be at.

If said shattering scattered the remnants of the Pegasus away, how would the Romulans ever find them? If they can, why can't the Federation, given their sensors and their ability to detect different elementary particles?

And shattering the Pegasus is not going to leave anything of use left; just a few flying hunks of metal.
So shattering is right out, so that leaves only melting and or vaporization. From episodes like "Booby Trap" and "Rise", vaporization of large asteroids in the 60 to 400 meter range is perfectly doable. When it does happen, as was the case in "Rise", it starts a major investigation, which in "Rise" leads the crew of Voyager discovering an asteroid they'd targeted for vaporization earlier in the episode was actually an artifical construct designed to resist such efforts.
Your point? Vaporization might be doable, but if it is not necessary, why would they do so? Same thing with melting. Riker was making the suggestion in real time, and made no confirmation to vaporize or melt. He only said destroy, which typically does not mean melt or vaporize, but merely fracture.

Shattering the asteroid would accomplish their objective. The Pegasus is likely to survive in one or two pieces, in which case the Enterprise can easily catch up with its remnants and secure it.
Again, you display your ignorance, be it intentional or otherwise. The E-D would have had to slam through a billion cubic meters of molten rock to get out. Furhermore Worf suggests using phasers to cut their way out, but Data nixes the idea, not because it is impossible for the phasers, but because the drilling action would cause the entire fissure they were inside to collapse:

PRESSMAN: We can't do it. If we abandon the Enterprise they'll come back here and get their hands on both ships.

PICARD: Agreed. Options?

WORF: Captain, I believe we could use the phasers to cut our way out.

DATA: The asteroid's internal structure is highly unstable. Any attempt to cut through the rock could cause the entire chasm to collapse.

RIKER: Captain, I have a suggestion. There's a piece of equipment in Admiral Pressman's quarters under guard which might get us out of here. It's a prototype for a Federation cloaking device.

When did you make this rebuttal? Because my updated post, which I made, as I recall, over half an hour ago, already addresses this issue. The "chasm collapsing" is apparently highly dangerous to the Enterprise:

1. The chasm collapsing could crush/destroy the Enterprise

2. The sealings on the entrance after the collapse would be too great to vaporize or barge through.

Neither of which speak well of the Enterprise's capabilities.
Furthermore, you keep endless repeating that the asteroid was hollow, yet to do so means you have ignored calculations which show that the volcanic fissues only make up less than 1 percent of the total volume of the asteroid.
Really? And where are these calculations?
Not to mention, you also fail to realize the signficance of the warbird's melting of a billion cubic meters of rock in just a few seconds! That's the equivalent of melting an spherical asteroid of 1,250 m diameter! Or to put it another way, the warbird unleashed 1.5 gigatons of energy in just a three seconds or 500 megatons each second.
-Mike
What? When did this happen? Are you referring to Worf's suggestion? Because:

1. There is no reason for using their phasers to "cut our way through" equating to melting the entire entrance, instead of just cutting an Enterprise sized hole through.

2. There is no evidence that it would only take them a few seconds; Picard was willing to wait for several hours inside the asteroid.


So if we go by shattering instead of vaporization/melting (both of which would be stupid overkill on Riker's part, and also demonstrate a potentially fatal lack of communication, as 'destroy' would be interpreted by Picard to blow up, not to vaporize/melt), the photon torpedos of the Enterprise are 0.6 to 6 megatons.

Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Base Delta Zero

Post by Admiral Breetai » Wed May 18, 2011 9:20 pm

really SWST assuming the asteroid wasn't especially durable when you consider Riker saw no problem with the enterprise easily blasting apart a moon...nor do they consider a fleet being able to turn a planet into a mini alderan graveyard especially advanced or sophisticated weaponry...that they routinely trade blows some times unshielded with vessels able to to essentially blasted massive pieces of the surface of a planet off showing huge violent shockwaves continuing for hundreds of miles with no trouble

you have no other choice but to assume the asteroid was especially durable and likely made of some wonky material consistent high end showings suggest this...

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: Base Delta Zero

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Wed May 18, 2011 9:58 pm

Could we keep non relevant ST material out of this, please?

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: Base Delta Zero

Post by Mike DiCenso » Wed May 18, 2011 11:52 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote: No, not really; the asteroid having unusual magnetic properties has nothing to do with its durability.
There you go again dismissing without providing a reason why. Having magnetic properties that can mess up a millions of metric ton starship or several tons shuttlecraft... spacecraft that I might remind you that have withstood stellar magnetic fields many orders of magnitude more powerful than the Earth indicates that the asteroid is not normal in any sense of the word. In order to generate a field of that magnitude, you'd have to have something on the order of a large black hole at the center of this asteroid to produce gravitational and magnetic disturbances big enough to shake the E-D or throw a shuttlecraft.

Your obvious ignorance of the episode in question is rather glaring. You need to step back and admit this instead of trying to twist around the information people are giving to you. Which by the way, would grounds for being issued another dishonesty warning should you continue to go down that route.
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:The 30 megatons were over a course of several hours. Said photon torpedos were in quick succession.

7.5 megatons and 6 megatons are very close for fan calculations.
Um, no. Read what I wrote again. You said that 600 kt (0.6 MT) to 5 megatons is what you get from shattering the asteroid. And no, 7.5 MT is not that close. It's 50 percent above the 5 MT estimate you provided, which is quite signficant as an increase. Furthermore, the torpedoes detonate within milliseconds, so that wattage will be insanely high.

StarWarsStarTrek wrote: You would think, then that Riker would go out of his way to specify vaporization to Picard, so as to not screw up via miscommunication, wouldn't he?

As for shattering destroying the Pegasus, you would be conceding that the energy needed to destroy said asteroid by shattering; 250 to 1000 megatons, would be enough to take out an unshielded Pegasus, even though only a miniscule portion of said energy would actually be directed at wherever the Pegasus would be at.

If said shattering scattered the remnants of the Pegasus away, how would the Romulans ever find them? If they can, why can't the Federation, given their sensors and their ability to detect different elementary particles?

And shattering the Pegasus is not going to leave anything of use left; just a few flying hunks of metal.
Crissakes, dude. This is blatently fallcious in every possible way. How do you know, for example, that shattering the Pegasus would leave such a small amount of material behind? How could Riker or anyone else know that by doing so that within any small piece that there would not also be surviving pieces of material useful to the Romulans or other enemies of the Federation?

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:Your point? Vaporization might be doable, but if it is not necessary, why would they do so? Same thing with melting. Riker was making the suggestion in real time, and made no confirmation to vaporize or melt. He only said destroy, which typically does not mean melt or vaporize, but merely fracture.

Shattering the asteroid would accomplish their objective. The Pegasus is likely to survive in one or two pieces, in which case the Enterprise can easily catch up with its remnants and secure it.
Except that it would not accomplish the objectives. That has been made plain and simple to you. You are assuming that, and you are deliberately twisting things to try and make it seem as though the Pegasus would be so utterly destroyed by a few megatons. The fact of the matter is that we have other episodes to compare this to. In fact we have also Star Trek: The Motion Picture where the 23rd century refit Enterprise mostly vaporizes a large asteroid with a single torpedo. All of this ties together as part of one continuity, you know.

1.) ST:TMP asteroid mostly vaporized. Check

2.) "Booby Trap" [TNG]: several asteroids and a large ship vaporized, one torpedo for each asteroid and the ship. Check

3.) "Skin of Evil" [TNG]: Explosion from single torpedo detonation hundreds of km wide indicating 500-1000 MT.

4.) "Rise" [VOY]: Asteroid hundreds of meters long and made of nickel and iron can be vaporized such that only a few tiny bits of debris less than one centimeter survive. Check.

5.) "For the Uniform" [DS9]: Each of the two quantum torpedoes fired at a Maquis planet produced explosions in the hundreds of km and continent sized shockwaves indicatiing 500-1000 MT of firepower.

I could go on and on. The point is clear and easily understandable. When Riker means destroy, he very likely means each torpedo is going to be doing some signficant amounts of vaporization and melting of the asteroid to ensure total and complete destruction of the Pegasus
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:When did you make this rebuttal? Because my updated post, which I made, as I recall, over half an hour ago, already addresses this issue. The "chasm collapsing" is apparently highly dangerous to the Enterprise:

1. The chasm collapsing could crush/destroy the Enterprise

2. The sealings on the entrance after the collapse would be too great to vaporize or barge through.

Neither of which speak well of the Enterprise's capabilities.
They are issues, but only if you are dishonest about it. First off, given that the asteroid could generate enough gravity for a total collapse of the chasm to occur, that's mighty impressive.

1.) You are clearly unfamilar with the episode, or pretend to be, so you do not have any idea the scale of what you are talking about.

2.) I just posted the dialog of Worf talking about cutting their way out. The only reason it is not viable is due to Data's warning about a possible instability of the chasm. Thus phasers can cut enough for the E-D to escape, and rebutting your earlier assertion.

But let's address your KE issue for the E-D. They were in a chasm 4 kilometers long. If the whole thing collapsed from the E-D cutting her way out with phasers, that would be at least a billion cubic meters falling on them from above, likely much more than that. Given the odd gravity of the asteroid, and assuming a low rock density of only 2.5 metric tons per meter cubed, we would have 2.5 billion tons falling on the E-D. Let's make it at a leisurely 20 meters a second, which would then be expressed as:


m = 2500000000 ton metric = 2500000000000 kilogram
v = 20 meter/second = 20 meter/second

Solution:

kinetic energy (K) = 5 x 10e14 joules

Basically the E-D soaks 5,000 TJ of KE.

And while this might be dangerous to the E-D, it's not automatically fatal. By contrast, the asteroid colliding with the ISD in TESB imparted 36 TJ of KE, destroying the bridge tower and quite possibly the rest of the ship with it.
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:Really? And where are these calculations?
They have been posted in threads you have participated in several times as well as numerous past ones. The chasm the E-D was in is no less than 3,000 meters long. We know this because when the E-D uses the phase cloak to move through the rock, Worf calls off the distance travelled and the distance remaining to the surface, and the rest of the chasm where the E-D was sitting trapped in was a good kilometer or more long based on the fact that the E-D is 642 meters long and at least 470 meters wide. But I'll even be generous and go with Graham Kennedy's more conservative estimate:

The volume of asteroidal material melted can be calculated by the equation :

V = pi x average radius of fissure2 x depth of fissure
= 3.142 x 3002 x 3000
= 3.142 x 3002 x 3000
= 848,340,000 cubic metres.

Assuming that the asteroid is rock the density, boiling point and specific heat capacity should be approximately 2,300 kg/cubic metre, 2500 K, and 720 J/Kg/K respectively. The energy required to melt this volume can be calculated thus :

E = 8.4834 x 108 x 2300 x 2500 x 720
= 3.512 x 1018 Joules


That's about 8.36 gigatons for a little more than 0.8 billion cubic meters of rock.

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:What? When did this happen? Are you referring to Worf's suggestion? Because:

1. There is no reason for using their phasers to "cut our way through" equating to melting the entire entrance, instead of just cutting an Enterprise sized hole through.
Are you really this dense? The Romulan warbird did it. To seal in the E-D. In order to fill a 3,000 m x 700 m tunnel with molten rock you have to have at least 800 million cubic meters, and given other scalings up to a billion cubic meters. The E-D herself is 470 meters wide, which means any tunnel they carve has to be at least 500 meters wide to allow a proper escape.

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:2. There is no evidence that it would only take them a few seconds; Picard was willing to wait for several hours inside the asteroid.
So if we go by shattering instead of vaporization/melting (both of which would be stupid overkill on Riker's part, and also demonstrate a potentially fatal lack of communication, as 'destroy' would be interpreted by Picard to blow up, not to vaporize/melt), the photon torpedos of the Enterprise are 0.6 to 6 megatons.
None of what you're saying makes any sense. Picard only waited for a few hours so that cloaking device could be installed. But you're either out of ignorance or intentially misreprensenting the episode's events.

1.) The E-D arrives on the scene under Admiral Pressman to find and if possible salvage the Pegasus.

2.) The warbird Terix under Sirol's command shows up, also looking for the ship.

3.) Both parties exchange pleasantries and go about the search under the cover of doing geological research.

4.) The E-D discovers the Pegasus, but finds that it is buried deep inside a large asteroid.

5.) The warbird starts coming over to see what the E-D has found, so very quickly everyone comes up with options. Riker's is to just destroy everything to ensure the Romulans don't get anything of the Pegasus.

6.) The E-D manages to use a technobabble trick to fool the warbird, then comes back the next day and enters the asteroid to get at the Pegasus. They travel down several kilometers into the asteroid and find the other ship half stuck in solid rock. Pressman and Riker beam over and retrieve the phase cloak prototype.

7.) The warbird fires on the asteroid for a few seconds while Pressman and Riker as still on the Pegasus. They beam back immediately and reach the bridge just in time to see hundreds of millions of cubic meters of rock flowing into the chasm.

8.) Sirol contacts Picard and offers to help evacuate the crew, but Picard puts it off in order to solicit options from the crew (Worf makes the suggestion to use the phasers to cut their way out). Riker then reveals the true nature of the mission and tells Picard about the cloaking device, which is installed on the E-D within 9 hours and used to escape.

You have a better sense of context now? Please keep this in mind as well as read up on the episode at Memory Alpha or Wikipedia because this is just inexcusable on your part.
-Mike

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: The Pegasus Redux

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Thu May 19, 2011 1:02 am

I will respond more in depth tomorrow, but an argument that caught my eye:

You denied that shattering the asteroid would destroy Pegasus. Maybe it would not, but what it would do is reveal the position of the ship, allowing for easy capture or destruction; given that survivors might have been aboard, capture would be preferred

The destruction of the asteroid simply makes it easier to spot and target the Pegasus. Vaporization would waste ammo and time, as well as potentially killing survivors.



And I just recently went on YouTube and watched the relevant parts of the episode. Entertaining, if not full of scientific/logical inaccuracies.

User avatar
Mith
Starship Captain
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:17 am

Re: The Pegasus Redux

Post by Mith » Thu May 19, 2011 1:59 am

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:I will respond more in depth tomorrow, but an argument that caught my eye:

You denied that shattering the asteroid would destroy Pegasus. Maybe it would not, but what it would do is reveal the position of the ship, allowing for easy capture or destruction; given that survivors might have been aboard, capture would be preferred

The destruction of the asteroid simply makes it easier to spot and target the Pegasus. Vaporization would waste ammo and time, as well as potentially killing survivors.



And I just recently went on YouTube and watched the relevant parts of the episode. Entertaining, if not full of scientific/logical inaccuracies.
No it wouldn't. That argument is about as accurate as claiming that firing dozens of mortar rounds into the sand will make finding an old tire easier. It won't, it'll just make a big mess. And even so, according to Wong's own site, it would require 729 megatons to fracture a 9 km asteroid. While yes, assuming 150 torpedoes this would suggest about 5 megatons low end, Wong's calculator works off the assumption that the warhead is buried within the asteroid--not surface impacts as would be the case with the Enterprise D destroying the asteroid. This would mean that about 75% of the energy in most cases would be directed away from the asteroid, making the yield of the torpedoes around four times higher for ~20 megatons. And this is assuming that we only need to be broken apart. It also ignores the fact that Riker is in a rush. Doing as much damage as possible in a short amount of time would suggest that the Enterprise D would be doing rapid fire as opposed to careful, optimal demolition, not to mention that large chunks breaking away might require their own torpedo and such.

In short, the subject in question is at best questionable and at worst downright impossible to calculate save for a lower estimation and even that's hard to guess given that the asteroid had gravitational fluxes that would cause shuttles to lose control.

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: The Pegasus Redux

Post by Mike DiCenso » Thu May 19, 2011 6:15 am

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:You denied that shattering the asteroid would destroy Pegasus. Maybe it would not, but what it would do is reveal the position of the ship, allowing for easy capture or destruction; given that survivors might have been aboard, capture would be preferred
You are obviously not paying much attention to what I or anyone else is writing, much less what is going on in the episode itself.

First off, no one actually that the Pegasus would not be damaged or destroyed in some fashion, just that it would not be damaged or destroyed in a sufficent way to prevent it having large chunks of the ship which could be captured and then analyized by the Romulans.

As Mith noted, trying to mortar out some sand or rock to find an old tire is rather messy and doesn't help you actually find it, just makes a big mess. There is nothing wasteful or inefficent about melting and or vaporizing large parts of the asteroid, especially since time was of the essence in that situation (as you would know if you watched the episode as you claim), and there was only 2-3 minutes to do something before the warbird Terix arrived on the scene. Given that context, a leisurely "digging" operation makes little or no sense.
-Mike

User1619
Padawan
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Base Delta Zero

Post by User1619 » Thu May 19, 2011 12:34 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:I notice something, a nitpick: Data states that the Pegasus was pulled in by the "gravitational field" of a 5km asteroid. Does anyone else find that strange? A 5km asteroid would have no noticeable gravitational field.
UNLESS it was made of some super-dense material, which would therefore be harder to destroy.

Kor_Dahar_Master
Starship Captain
Posts: 1246
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Base Delta Zero

Post by Kor_Dahar_Master » Thu May 19, 2011 3:54 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:

No, not really; the asteroid having unusual magnetic properties has nothing to do with its durability.
Gravity was obviously a major issue as well as they not only mention it but also comment it would be enough to crush the ship.

Lets use Wong methodology shall we?.

We look for high magnetic properties as well as high gravatational properties and we obviously come up with the conclusion it was a fragment from a neutron star possably even a magnetar, doing so also explains why so many photons are required...:).

Post Reply