At Admiral Breetai

For polite and reasoned discussion of Star Wars and/or Star Trek.
StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: At Admiral Breetai

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:36 pm

Admiral Breetai wrote:
is this an attempt at slickery I detect?
Answer the question.


I think you should know by now I am very forward..in what i say
So you really do accuse them of being cyber terrorists?

no see the burden is on you to prove that a completely outrageously high end medium has basis in the movies

you wanna claim this lunacy is legit..prove it
You still don't get it. It has basis because it's been approved by George Lucas. It's therefore by default canon.
it is a massive high end showing that is contradicted by the primary canon
Provide an example of it being contradicted.

word of god is entirely irrelevant either he creates a consistent medium feats and the consistency there in over rule everything or he can go take his comments..some where else

besides numerous posters have supplied quotes by lucas on what he feels the EU is

[
Except that you don't own Star Wars, so your opinion on Star Wars canon is completely worthless.


so basically the use of fan calcs and scaling..supposedly supports it
You mean something called math and science? Are you trying to claim that math and science are invalid?

you know that smell when a bull takes a dump? yeah try again..with actual primary canon evidence this time
This is getting ridiculous. You dismissed a calculation based on G canon because it's a fan calculation; should I therefore dismiss your entire argument because it's from a fan? You do realize that this site, stardestroyer.net, and darkstar's website all use fan calculations, right?
did you confuse me with another poster? where did this come from?
What is it with you? Why don't you actually try to counter my calculations, instead of calling it fan calculations and dismissing it?
close to five decades of consistent high end showings
Provide examples please.

why are you supplying to me third party anylisis from a non canon source and a biased unobjective website?
Based on your own logic, since this website isn't objective and you are not a canon source, everything you say is completely irrelevant.

yes it's very obvious this mans analysis is a bastion of objectivity and correct assessment...
You aren't objective either, so you're irrelevant.
oh oh okay every single but post but that one...
You know as well as me that I'll find a counter example to that one, and then you'll say every one but that one...and that one...and that one.

This is ridiculous. You have dismissed calculations simply because they're by fans, which is ridiculous because you are a fan. You know why? Because you don't understand the calculations, so you try to find a shortcut. In debates, you cannot use such obvious ad hominems.



I've also noticed that you've provided no arguments of your own. Please prove why you think that Star Trek could beat Star Wars.

Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: At Admiral Breetai

Post by Admiral Breetai » Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:00 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[

Answer the question.
you have no sense of awareness do you?
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[
So you really do accuse them of being cyber terrorists?]
why are you rushing to defend a site of aggressive crazy people with the passion a dedicated follower?
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[
You still don't get it. It has basis because it's been approved by George Lucas. It's therefore by default canon.
he approves many things...making money is important..consistency is not..word of god is irrelevant the only thing that matters is consistent showings...


[
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[
Provide an example of it being contradicted.
I'm not the guy trying to claim a massively out of character...wanked inconsistent side bit of evidence is consistent with the primary canon
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[
Except that you don't own Star Wars, so your opinion on Star Wars canon is completely worthless.
canon policy is irrelevant in a vs debate conform to consistency with the primary canon or admit you have no ground to stand on


StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[You mean something called math and science? Are you trying to claim that math and science are invalid?
when done up by posters, when done by posters on sites known for lies and biased..when done by you and me...and any one else who is not..in the primary canon

IS IS ENTIRELY IRRELEVANT


[
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[
This is getting ridiculous. You dismissed a calculation based on G canon because it's a fan calculation; should I therefore dismiss your entire argument because it's from a fan? You do realize that this site, stardestroyer.net, and darkstar's website all use fan calculations, right?
fan math is not a canon source...it is completely invalid and irrelevant debate based off feats or let silence reign


StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[What is it with you? Why don't you actually try to counter my calculations, instead of calling it fan calculations and dismissing it?
1, BECAUSE THEY AREN'T CANON...you don't understand that fan math is not valid evidence...especially from biased sources? go by feats supply on screen evidence..and not a essay on it..because your numbers are not relevant..cease anlysis and just dump screen shots provide canon proof validating the EU...or cease posting

2, still aren't able to grasp basic questions? I asked what that had to do with anything I said you tossed out a strawman




[
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[]Provide examples please.
I have..

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[
Based on your own logic, since this website isn't objective and you are not a canon source, everything you say is completely irrelevant.
..well see that would work if you actually knew what you where talking about, see if I was trying to pass off unofficial math...and other such inane things that have no basis in a debate based entirely around the consistency of feats...you'd have a point

seeing as I;m not you do not

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[
You aren't objective either, so you're irrelevant.
you see how it is? your intentions where never to challenge me to an actual debate like the proper way with arbitration and all that..your intentions where simply to fap to wars..and rig the debate and just dismiss everything me and Ds say..this isn't something I'm allowing

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[
You know as well as me that I'll find a counter example to that one, and then you'll say every one but that one...and that one...and that one.
the point is the majority of the things you type are biased and guilty or something a couple major religions...would consider a sin
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[This is ridiculous. You have dismissed calculations simply because they're by fans, which is ridiculous because you are a fan.
no I dismiss them because you have no canon standing..and thus all your math is inadmissible fan interpretation that have no basis when I asked for feats

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[You know why? Because you don't understand the calculations, so you try to find a shortcut.
*steve Iwrin voicve* flustered and backed into a corner the rare breed known as a follower of wong resorts to calling the other side stupid and ignorant..it is a defense mechanism.. designed to discredit and achieve victory by proxy..depending on the offending rival this has a chance at working..other times it simply fails and he becomes prey *end Steve Irwin voice*

also your not grasping the concept of the debate "regardless that is not canon"
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[
In debates, you cannot use such obvious ad hominems.
why are you hiding behind big words..and yes I can...you are not a canon source your math is not valid..your opinions are not backed up by primary canon and consistent feats the entirety..of your debate has been one gigantic..flame war and all your interested in doing is attacking the other side

I am entirely within my rights to dismiss you and any one else's math and concentrate strictly on what happens on screen consistently..because that is all that matters
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:[
I've also noticed that you've provided no arguments of your own. Please prove why you think that Star Trek could beat Star Wars.
because and if you knew anything about how to debate I'm at present attacking the validity of your methods your objectivity and your arguments..not making any claims..simply outright attacking yours, because I make no such claims no such argument is being provided I am and will continue to challenge your arguments because they are biased they are fraudulent your a liar and your making use of irrelevant non canon fan based interpretation that have zero validity in any debate where one party is demanding feats

again provide actual on screen evidence with out fan math with out speculation and with out parroting another site..to validate your use of the EU..or cease using it all together
Last edited by Admiral Breetai on Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: At Admiral Breetai

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Sun Jan 16, 2011 2:38 pm

Admiral, you cannot dismiss calculations because they are not official. They are based off of canon, and therefore you have to disprove the math.

I know that this sounds hard to believe for you, but math and science are not fan inventions. They're the reason why you have a computer. Your idea that "fan math" exists shows your disturbing lack of knowledge of what humankind has acquired for our history. Math is not subjective, and there is no such thing as fan math.

The formula for kinetic energy at non relativistic speeds is extremely simple and was not invented by Star Wars fans. It's been around for quite some time and is the basis for much of physics. We know the rough mass of the Death Star, and we know its speed. Therefore, its kinetic energy is completely indisputable, because math is absolute.

So please stop dodging the argument and prove my math wrong or concede.

And YOU ARE A FUCKING RED HERRING ADDICT! You're entire post is filled with responses that are 100% totally IRRELEVANT to the post that you were responding to. For example, I point out a flaw in your logic, and your claim....is that I rigged the debate. Of course, you provide no evidence to support this, you just claim it.

Now:

1. The Death Star's power generation is at least e28 joules.
2. When scaled to a star destroyer, this translates to at least e22 joules.
3. In comparison, the Enterprise is about e19 joules.
4. Therefore, Star Wars ships are more powerful.
5. Star Wars has millions of planets. Star Trek has a few thousand.

Conclusion: Star Wars wins.

Now debunk this.

Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: At Admiral Breetai

Post by Admiral Breetai » Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:06 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:Admiral, you cannot dismiss calculations because they are not official. They are based off of canon, and therefore you have to disprove the math.
yes I can they themselves are not canon...and are done by fans who in many cases are outrageously biased

go by feats and leave the math at spacebattles
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: I know that this sounds hard to believe for you, but math and science are not fan inventions. They're the reason why you have a computer. Your idea that "fan math" exists shows your disturbing lack of knowledge of what humankind has acquired for our history. Math is not subjective, and there is no such thing as fan math.
so let me get this straight...my refusal to accept non canon numbers that are often times patently biased done by people who aren't capable of objective reasoning..a lack of knowledge

the fact that you think Math cannot be subjective shows how arrogant elitist and incredibly poor your judgment is

for the record it's insanely stupid to try and tell a fanatic of world history and a former student..that he's ignorant your inviting..the opportunity to make yourself look like a fool
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:The formula for kinetic energy at non relativistic speeds is extremely simple and was not invented by Star Wars fans. It's been around for quite some time and is the basis for much of physics. We know the rough mass of the Death Star, and we know its speed. Therefore, its kinetic energy is completely indisputable, because math is absolute.
how does this change the fact that almost every one on SDN and SB are biased..inflate their math lie..or speculate or base their numbers on nothing

I will continue to reject non canon math..as long as I feel like because we are arguing based on consistent feats not bullshit..written by some dude who thinks..with the crass arrogance and demented sense of self righteousness
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: So please stop dodging the argument and prove my math wrong or concede.
cease posting non canon fan math
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:
And YOU ARE A FUCKING RED HERRING ADDICT! You're entire post is filled with responses that are 100% totally IRRELEVANT to the post that you were responding to. For example, I point out a flaw in your logic, and your claim....is that I rigged the debate. Of course, you provide no evidence to support this, you just claim it.
and your back to trolling..and lying and failing to prove a god damn thing...can't beat the argument..cry about it

your math = bullshit I don't even have to acknowledge deal with it and move on
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: Now:

1. The Death Star's power generation is at least e28 joules.
1, who gives a damn I certainly don't all i see is a lack of feats presented to me as if it means something

2, prove it with canon statements and feats from the movie
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:2. When scaled to a star destroyer, this translates to at least e22 joules.
take your scaling and leave it at the door show me proof from the movies
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:3. In comparison, the Enterprise is about e19 joules.
I'm not seeing anything other then "DURRR STAR WARS WINS AND ANY BODY WHO DARES SAYS MY MATH IS WRONG HATES SCIENCE"
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:4. Therefore, Star Wars ships are more powerful.
something you have failed to prove with anything that actually is valid evidence..like you know movie feats

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:5. Star Wars has millions of planets. Star Trek has a few thousand.
and yet they only fielded a few million clones and at most a hundred or so ships in the movies...and the clone wars which is non canon EU garbage but hilariously more accurate then the rest of the EU which is bullshit we will not be debating here (seriously I'm pulling a darkstar with this you can leave this shit at the door) considered a few million more troops a financially draining process

while the enemy has fielded thousands of vessels and competed industrially with a power that reaches near macross level industrial might..which is well beyond the empire's capacity..to match
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: Conclusion: Star Wars wins.
conclusion a dozen or so Galaxy classes and maybe a sovie..backed up by like five Excelsiors..empty their payload into the DS and mass scatter it

and you know whats cool about that? nothing shown in the star wars movies disproves this..you can literally show me nothing that supports what your trying to prove and are so desperate to prove other wise..you have done nothing but lie try to use non canon..fan math..and the EU..which is trash and will not be used in this debate because you have failed constantly to meet the burden of proof of its validity

StarWarsStarTrek wrote: Now debunk this.
when you do something other then hurl insults ignorantly mouthing off about another posters intelligence ..lie..and post stuff thats not canon and give me something tangible to debunk I will gladly so do

since you haven't theres not much more I can do but sit here laugh at the dedication you show and the biased with which you rage

and oh do you rage you'd make a sith proud with your rage
Last edited by Admiral Breetai on Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: At Admiral Breetai

Post by Admiral Breetai » Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:24 pm

to sum up my thoughts on your use of calculations and SDN style scientific elitist bashing heres a poster

Image

and neither do I this is the last time your calcs or the EU will be discussed in this thread..you stick to the movies..or depart the debate and cease posting in this thread entirely..I honestly could care less I will not indulge fanwank..and widely contradictory OOC side stories only officially acknowledged for the soul purpose of milking a cash cow

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: At Admiral Breetai

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:53 pm

You think that my math is biased? Prove it. I gave my math. If you think it's biased and not objective, examine it line for line and reveal the inconsistencies. Otherwise, your accusation has no evidence or logic to back it up.

For example, if you think that my scalings are messed up, explain why. Show me a picture and then use math and science to show that my scalings don't work.

Or, if you think that my assumptions are wrong, point them out and show why. Your entire basis for your rebuttal so far has no evidence to back it up.

Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: At Admiral Breetai

Post by Admiral Breetai » Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:58 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:You think that my math is biased? Prove it. I gave my math. If you think it's biased and not objective, examine it line for line and reveal the inconsistencies. Otherwise, your accusation has no evidence or logic to back it up.
every one thinks your math is biased man even the fringe warsies..on SB think its biased

and your missing the point..I'm rejecting it out right because its irrelevant and immaterial to a feat based debate system
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: For example, if you think that my scalings are messed up, explain why. Show me a picture and then use math and science to show that my scalings don't work.
what part of "fan calculations are immaterial and irrelevant and not going to be indulged in this debate" escapes you

FEATS...all that matters..provide them from the movies or go home
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: Or, if you think that my assumptions are wrong, point them out and show why. Your entire basis for your rebuttal so far has no evidence to back it up.
how about this..start going by consistent feats form the primary canon using nothing that can possibly used to inflate and aggrandize..simple feats..debate that way instead of parroting some other guy..and insulting my intelligence

and you still don't understand how to debate I see..since the concept of just who has to prove what in this situation completely eludes you

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: At Admiral Breetai

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Mon Jan 17, 2011 2:02 am

Admiral Breetai wrote: every one thinks your math is biased man even the fringe warsies..on SB think its biased
Appeal to popularity fallacy.
and your missing the point..I'm rejecting it out right because its irrelevant and immaterial to a feat based debate system
The Death Star moving at over 600 km/second is a feat.
what part of "fan calculations are immaterial and irrelevant and not going to be indulged in this debate" escapes you
Jedi Master Spock has plenty of calculations, as does darkstar and Mike Wong. This website is a technical analysis. TECHNICAL.

Quote from the starfleet jedi main page:

"your source for fresh and original analysis of Star Trek and Star Wars,
comprehensive examination of the infamous VS debate about the two franchises,
and insightful technological analyses."

Key words:

comprehensive
analysis

FEATS...all that matters..provide them from the movies or go home
I did. The Death Star was moving at over 600 km/s. Fact. That would take over e30 joules of energy based solely on a feat from G canon. Fact. The kinetic energy formula was not invented by fans.
how about this..start going by consistent feats form the primary canon using nothing that can possibly used to inflate and aggrandize..simple feats..debate that way instead of parroting some other guy..and insulting my intelligence
Simple feats? Thanks for admitting that you can't understand anything that's not simple. If you want to have a simple debate, why not go debate a kindergardener?

The fact is, you cannot reject a point on the basis of it being too complex, because that's admitting that you can't combat it.

Also, if you think that it's inflated, you have to prove it.
and you still don't understand how to debate I see..since the concept of just who has to prove what in this situation completely eludes you
Ok; since you cannot understand a concept as basic as kinetic energy, something that they teach you in middle school, I'll make it very simple for you:

The Empire or any other major Star Wars civilization has millions of planets
The Federation has at most a thousand planets.

Therefore, Star Wars is bigger, has been around longer, and is more populated. It wins. Simple, true and virtually absolute.

So try countering that.

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: At Admiral Breetai

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Mon Jan 17, 2011 2:21 am

Sorry for the double post, but I shall revise my argument in order to account for your unwillingness to accept that Kinetic energy = mass times velocity squared. Apparently, you think that you're smarter than Einstein. Literally.

My opening argument:

Star Wars operates on a far larger scale than Star Trek. For example, Star Wars spans millions of planets according to G canon, and Coruscant has trillions of citizens. Coruscant also has skyscrapers several kms tall. This implies several things:

1. Durasteel is strong enough to withstand the enormous weight of such a tall structure, and is resistant to earthquakes and other natural phenomena.
2. Star Wars would have the industrial capability to create such a city planet.
3. Star Wars would be able to feed and supply such a planet.

In comparison, Star Trek consists of about 1000 planets spanning 8000 lys. Glimpses of Earth shows a society far less industrialized than Star Wars. They also lack the galactic trade of Star Wars. Most of their colonies have been around for a few hundred years, whereas Star Wars's major planets have been inhabited for tens of thousands of years.

Therefore, even assuming rough parity in weapons and shields (which we can't calculated going by your "no math" rule), Star Wars is far larger, with a larger population, faster travel, more widespread trade, etc. Star Wars is simply on a larger scale. Their cities are larger, their ships are larger, their wars are larger.

There's also the Death Star. There is absolutely nothing that the Federation can do through brute force to it, and they lack the ability to accurately send a projectile down the reactor, especially since they'd lack the plans to the Death Star.

In ground combat, Star Trek has no vehicles, no body armor, no grenades, and moronic tactics. You might counter with the Ewoks example, but such an occurrence is rare in Star Wars, whereas in Star Trek guys with phasers routinely get beaten by unarmed guys.

In fact, many episodes show phasers being unable to penetrate the redshirts' pajamas, or rocks. Blasters routinely blow large holes in walls.

Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: At Admiral Breetai

Post by Admiral Breetai » Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:24 am

StarWarsStarTrek wrote: Appeal to popularity fallacy.
hiding behind those terms only proves your a terrible debater


[
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: The Death Star moving at over 600 km/second is a feat.
really? you can show me where this was said in the movies?
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:
Jedi Master Spock has plenty of calculations, as does darkstar and Mike Wong. This website is a technical analysis. TECHNICAL.
and they're math is just as unusable as yours if i choose to invoke primary canon only with them I don't do so in debates against DS and JMS because 1, never debated against them 2, have no reason not to trust them when I have every reason in the world to think all of your work and actions are dishonest and geared towards proving an agenda
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: Quote from the starfleet jedi main page:

"your source for fresh and original analysis of Star Trek and Star Wars,
comprehensive examination of the infamous VS debate about the two franchises,
and insightful technological analyses."

Key words:

comprehensive
analysis
you hardly need math to do that...now cease griping about your invalid fan numbers and post some feats
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:
I did. The Death Star was moving at over 600 km/s. Fact. That would take over e30 joules of energy based solely on a feat from G canon. Fact. The kinetic energy formula was not invented by fans.
you have no proof on the DS actual speed being that fast nothing was said in the movies and if it was..this does not help them..when faced with a small fleet where each ship is fully capable of wiping out all life on a planet


StarWarsStarTrek wrote:Simple feats? Thanks for admitting that you can't understand anything that's not simple. If you want to have a simple debate, why not go debate a kindergardener?
and thus the SDner fails..and has to resort to insults...I'm rejecting your math not because I can't understand it but because it is invalid..as evidence due to your near constant dishonest misconduct exhausting my willingness to indulge in your..take on things..that is not official

your also committing a bannable offense by insulting my intelligence
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:The fact is, you cannot reject a point on the basis of it being too complex, because that's admitting that you can't combat it.
your math isn't canon and isn't objective..deal with it
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: Also, if you think that it's inflated, you have to prove it.
I don't have to prove anything it's unusable

StarWarsStarTrek wrote: Ok; since you cannot understand a concept as basic as kinetic energy, something that they teach you in middle school, I'll make it very simple for you:
see it'd be amusing when you patronize me like this but since you aren't actually capable of doing your own math and have to parrot some one else's..It's actually rather sad

[
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:The Empire or any other major Star Wars civilization has millions of planets
who's industry is made of pure fail..if the movies are any indication

[
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:
The Federation has at most a thousand planets.
more then that but they make much better use of it
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:Therefore, Star Wars is bigger, has been around longer, and is more populated. It wins. Simple, true and virtually absolute.
the GE is larger then both The Human kind Empire Abh and the Earth Federation..both would completely monster stomp the GE worse then the trek Galaxy would..and by murder stomp I mean "oh hey look bugs on our windshield" bad..

New Genesis is just one planet..put it against the Ge and watch how badly the empire gets raped..size means very little when faced with superior industry and technology

hell Gladiator and Superman are one person and each one of them could collapse the Galactic empire inside of say a year for supes and a month for Gladz or so if they felt so inclined..with the Empire being completely helpless to stop them to boot

size means very fucking little when your opponents are vastly superior to you and have way better use of they're abilities
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: So try countering that.
you only made two valid points in that tirade of raging and juvenile insulting..and they are countered easily enough and have been since the moment you tried to pull this asinine excuse for a bait thread out
Last edited by Admiral Breetai on Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:12 am, edited 2 times in total.

Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: At Admiral Breetai

Post by Admiral Breetai » Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:45 am

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:Sorry for the double post, but I shall revise my argument in order to account for your unwillingness to accept that Kinetic energy = mass times velocity squared. Apparently, you think that you're smarter than Einstein. Literally.
you continue to miss my point entirely..about why your math is invalid it seems
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:My opening argument:
I haven't seen an argument..I've seen a temper tantrum
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: Star Wars operates on a far larger scale than Star Trek. For example, Star Wars spans millions of planets according to G canon, and Coruscant has trillions of citizens. Coruscant also has skyscrapers several kms tall. This implies several things:
the clone wars movie makes mention of many hundreds of thousands of systems..yet they can't even come close to matching the fleet sizes seen through out the Dominion War..with the battle of coruscant being the only one

the movies never provided a population number for coruscant so back that up with film quotes or..let silence reign
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:1. Durasteel is strong enough to withstand the enormous weight of such a tall structure, and is resistant to earthquakes and other natural phenomena.
an Eu metal not applicable to the debate

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:2. Star Wars would have the industrial capability to create such a city planet.
really? it could of easily taken thousands of years we literally have nothing from the moving backing up this was done instantly and if you wanna ramble about industrial might try instantly resurrecting dead stars and creating earth like planets out of dead husks inside of months/years
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: 3. Star Wars would be able to feed and supply such a planet.
such a terrible drain on their economy seeing as they cannot even field..more then a few thousand vessels at most (note nothing in the movies supports this number) and a quarter of a million battle ready clones was considered a grand army

[
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:In comparison, Star Trek consists of about 1000 planets spanning 8000 lys. Glimpses of Earth shows a society far less industrialized than Star Wars.
yeah totally ignore the fact that replicators do inside of a few hours/days..what massive factories like we see in the capital and mustafar are needed for
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: They also lack the galactic trade of Star Wars.
when you can fabricate out of thin air so to speak virtually everything you need outside of a few rare materials...this is not needed

[
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:Most of their colonies have been around for a few hundred years, whereas Star Wars's major planets have been inhabited for tens of thousands of years.
and most of those colonies have populations in the high billions..where as we have only seen on screen worlds in wars that seem sparsely populated with words like Nabuu and the Imperial capital being..minorities again backed up by the movies..

[
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:Therefore, even assuming rough parity in weapons and shields (which we can't calculated going by your "no math" rule)
we can go by destructive feats...the damage done by ST weapon fire that we can see vs wars..
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:, Star Wars is far larger, with a larger population, faster travel, more widespread trade, etc. Star Wars is simply on a larger scale. Their cities are larger, their ships are larger, their wars are larger.
and yet time and time again...nothing in wars has even come close to the size of the Dominion or Fed fleets

[
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:There's also the Death Star. There is absolutely nothing that the Federation can do through brute force to it, and they lack the ability to accurately send a projectile down the reactor, especially since they'd lack the plans to the Death Star.
1, they can blow it to a million pieces..seeing as their ships actually have on panel..feats as it where suggesting world killing might and at no point in the movies did the DS ever survive that

2, your joking? they can target individual people on planets and fire cap ship weapons on them..scan for life sings and bacteria from just entering planetary orbit..and in some cases...from another solar system

seeing as you keep referring to "star trek" I'm going to go ahead and assume you mean the entire damn Milky way the Empires fighting..through Dominion Voth and Borg space...and you better adjust your little pet theories

[
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:In ground combat, Star Trek has no vehicles, no body armor, no grenades,
they don't need it...considering a cap ship can take out individuals from orbit..but I'll give you the body armor thing thats ret-oh wait no they do have body armor..we saw it in TOS never mind
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:and moronic tactics.
because in all six movies republic commandos and storm troopers..totally showed genius tactics..oh wait no they didn't
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:You might counter with the Ewoks example, but such an occurrence is rare in Star Wars,
no they aren't in the primary canon you have..freaken Gungans a teen aged princess who as far as we saw never handled a weapon professionally in her life..some droids..some pilots and a pair of Jedi...we have friggen wookies and of course...the dumb ass who thought allowing fighters eventually lead by a hillbilly farmboy with zero combat experience to get through the DS defenses and frag up its defenses

and of course the Ewoks and judging by the end of the movie..the empire being utterly helpless to do anything to stop mass protests and parties once the Kentucky fried Sith and the seven foot tall cry baby..got axed
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: whereas in Star Trek guys with phasers routinely get beaten by unarmed guys.
you mean by super powerful cyborgs...genetically engineered superman...a race of genetically engineered crack addicted homicidal maniacs or...Klingons noted as being several times stronger then humans..or near immortal aliens who's own bodily fluids are so aggressive they kill the person exposed to them?

i mean outside of a few instances that can be justified and a few that can't Star Wars beats them firmly in stupid combat engagements
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:In fact, many episodes show phasers being unable to penetrate the redshirts' pajamas, or rocks. Blasters routinely blow large holes in walls.
and in other episodes phaser overloads blow up buildings come off like damn RPG's and what have you

you really are hell bent on continuing this exorcise in sillyness huh? your personal need to prove Star Wars ubberz all is such that you have to continue this self indulgent arrogant tirade?

Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: At Admiral Breetai

Post by Admiral Breetai » Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:14 am

yo hommie *eye role* while I'm at it..

what's stopping the Dominion or hell S31 from just mass annihilating solar systems? the tech is readily available and it's not used because of PIS..which should have no basis in a debate like this

Lucky
Jedi Master
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: At Admiral Breetai

Post by Lucky » Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:10 am

Admiral Breetai wrote:yo hommie *eye role* while I'm at it..

what's stopping the Dominion or hell S31 from just mass annihilating solar systems? the tech is readily available and it's not used because of PIS..which should have no basis in a debate like this
PIS stands for plot induced stupidity last I checked. Not destroying planets and stars falls more under not using weapons of mass destruction.

I don't really see where the UFP could have benefited from such actions.

Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: At Admiral Breetai

Post by Admiral Breetai » Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:17 pm

Lucky wrote:
Admiral Breetai wrote: PIS stands for plot induced stupidity last I checked. Not destroying planets and stars falls more under not using weapons of mass destruction.

I don't really see where the UFP could have benefited from such actions.
in the Dominion war proper? not over much but since they can rebuild stars and planets as of that era it's not as horrible a thing as it would of been in say the Ent C or early Ent D's time which to me is scary and desensitizing -but later on if the war had progressed into the hundreds of billions of casualties range the augments predicted? it profited them nothing to hold back one supposes you could argue CIS though as to why s31 simply didn't do it these guys struck me as far less morally righteous then the rest of the government/civilian structure

but the dominion? the only reason I can think of for them not cracking open they're super weapon chest is fear of a Federation response with all the goodies from kirks era on up..but other then that they had no reason not to start life wiping and Weyoun really had no qualms what so ever about doing it..especially after Martok and Worf and miles and Quark and Julian up and ghosted a critical Dominion shipyard (things started to go south for them around this time) they had no reason aside from CIS/PIS and maaybbbee fear at a Fed response (I think that was elaborated on in a non canon novel they took a good look at a Fed database and shat a brick..but it was never mentioned in the show so)

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: At Admiral Breetai

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:24 pm

Admiral Breetai wrote:
you continue to miss my point entirely..about why your math is invalid it seems
Actually, when questioned why, you said that you didn't need to say why, because it was unusuable, which is one of the most embarrassing rebuttals ever said in a vs debate. You said that my math isn't objective. Prove it, or concede.
I haven't seen an argument..I've seen a temper tantrum
Prove it. You haven't proven anything.
the clone wars movie makes mention of many hundreds of thousands of systems..yet they can't even come close to matching the fleet sizes seen through out the Dominion War..with the battle of coruscant being the only one
Yet the Battle of Coruscant is still an example, and it matches the dominion war's numbers, only that the ships in the Battle of Coruscant and far larger.

the movies never provided a population number for coruscant so back that up with film quotes or..let silence reign
The novels mention "trillions of beings".

an Eu metal not applicable to the debate
It's shown in primary canon, aka the skyscrapers. Sure, the name "durasteel" isn't given, but the exact name is irrelevant. The fact is that it's strong enough to hold the weight of km long skyscrapers.

really? it could of easily taken thousands of years we literally have nothing from the moving backing up this was done instantly and if you wanna ramble about industrial might try instantly resurrecting dead stars and creating earth like planets out of dead husks inside of months/years
Given that the buildings are modern, the construction of the recent buildings could not have been so long ago. Otherwise, it would be like the United States having constructed its skyscrapers hundreds of years ago.

Not to mention that they'd have to have been able to maintain them.

such a terrible drain on their economy seeing as they cannot even field..more then a few thousand vessels at most (note nothing in the movies supports this number) and a quarter of a million battle ready clones was considered a grand army
Show me a single Star Trek battle, if you can, of a few thousand vessels with masses approaching star destroyers. You can't.

yeah totally ignore the fact that replicators do inside of a few hours/days..what massive factories like we see in the capital and mustafar are needed for
Bullshit. Replicators can make small things like coffee and such, but they can't construct spaceships. If you think they can, prove it. Show evidence.
when you can fabricate out of thin air so to speak virtually everything you need outside of a few rare materials...this is not needed
Yes it is, because we've seen that replicators cannot replicate anything more complex than a cup of coffee or larger than...a household object.

and most of those colonies have populations in the high billions..
Prove it.
where as we have only seen on screen worlds in wars that seem sparsely populated with words like Nabuu and the Imperial capital being..minorities again backed up by the movies..
Coruscant is so crowded that it fills up kms of vertical traffic that makes New York City seem like Canada. Basically, it's an entire planet surface with each inch being literally hundreds of times more busy than New York City.

we can go by destructive feats...the damage done by ST weapon fire that we can see vs wars..
Provide evidence please.


and yet time and time again...nothing in wars has even come close to the size of the Dominion or Fed fleets
Except that you admitted that the Battle of Coruscant approaches them. In fact, given that the battle was a surprise, with both sides only being able to muster what they could gather on a whim, and that the ships were far larger than Star Trek ships, this is more impressive than the dominion battles.

1, they can blow it to a million pieces..seeing as their ships actually have on panel..feats as it where suggesting world killing might and at no point in the movies did the DS ever survive that
Yes, the Death Star could. It was within, from a space perspective, point blank range of the Alderaan destruction event, and yet was unaffected by the astronomical amounts of energy and debris hitting it.

2, your joking? they can target individual people on planets and fire cap ship weapons on them..scan for life sings and bacteria from just entering planetary orbit..and in some cases...from another solar system
Prove it, and then explain why the couldn't detect a massive colony of 100,000 people.
seeing as you keep referring to "star trek" I'm going to go ahead and assume you mean the entire damn Milky way the Empires fighting..through Dominion Voth and Borg space...and you better adjust your little pet theories
You mean the same borg that only bother to send one borg cube at a time? Oh.

they don't need it...considering a cap ship can take out individuals from orbit..
Prove it, and explain why the protagonists don't always use this to take out the baddies instead of beaming down and having firefights with them.
but I'll give you the body armor thing thats ret-oh wait no they do have body armor..we saw it in TOS never mind
You mean the body armor that can't stop knives, phasers or much of anything?

because in all six movies republic commandos and storm troopers..totally showed genius tactics..oh wait no they didn't
As moronic as Star Wars tactics may be, they're still better than Star Trek tactics, which are an embarrassment to the military doctrine acquired throughout mankind's relatively bloody history. It's like Star Trek humanity gained amnesia and forgot everything about military tactics, so that their tactics got so bad that even movie starship troopers could defeat them. Heck, even LA street gangs might be able to defeat redshirts. They're just that bad.

no they aren't in the primary canon you have..freaken Gungans a teen aged princess who as far as we saw never handled a weapon professionally in her life..some droids..some pilots and a pair of Jedi...we have friggen wookies and of course...the dumb ass who thought allowing fighters eventually lead by a hillbilly farmboy with zero combat experience to get through the DS defenses and frag up its defenses
More lies. Leia was a Force sensitive that got training in blasters. So did Like, who, contrary to your claims of being a hillbilly farmboy, was brave enough to take on Vader in personal combat, take out an AT-AT on his own and talk shit to the emperor.

and of course the Ewoks and judging by the end of the movie..the empire being utterly helpless to do anything to stop mass protests and parties once the Kentucky fried Sith and the seven foot tall cry baby..got axed
Which is completely irrelevant, isn't it?
you mean by super powerful cyborgs...genetically engineered superman...a race of genetically engineered crack addicted homicidal maniacs or...Klingons noted as being several times stronger then humans..or near immortal aliens who's own bodily fluids are so aggressive they kill the person exposed to them?
On the contrary, starfleet engineering officers with no hand to hand combat training routinely take out guys in body armor with phasers. Guess what? Those guys in body armor with phasers often times have the element of surprise, and superior numbers!

And this doesn't just happen once; it happens virtually all the freaking time! So much that klingons charge into combat with knives and actually win!

In fact, there many instances in which a guy gets hit center of mass at point blank range in the chest with a phaser and is only mildly injured.

There are other cases of phasers hitting unarmored redshirts and literally failing to penetrate their uniforms. Literally. They made no holes at all. They couldn't penetrate freaking pajamas.

i mean outside of a few instances that can be justified and a few that can't Star Wars beats them firmly in stupid combat engagements
A few? You mean every single season, and happening every few episodes?

There are examples of a few thugs with phasers taking on and capturing the most advanced ship in the fleet, aka the Enterprise. Or a teenager taking over the ship. Or the Voyager crew being too stupid to change access codes after being spied on. Or being too stupid to use protection after a crew member gets infected.

The stupidity continues. Upon making first contact with an alien race, Archer tells them where to find Earth. How beyond fucking stupid? It's like meeting a stranger and telling them where you live and where your kid goes to school. It's fucking insane.

and in other episodes phaser overloads blow up buildings come off like damn RPG's and what have you
But according to you, only consistent showings matter. There are other examples of overloaded phasers making hand grenade size explosions.

That being said, I'm calling bullshit on that. Show me an example of phaser overload blowing up buildings.

you really are hell bent on continuing this exorcise in sillyness huh? your personal need to prove Star Wars ubberz all is such that you have to continue this self indulgent arrogant tirade?
The fact is that, Star Wars has to have a larger industrial base than Star Trek just in order to survive in universe. Why? Because they'd have to be able to feed, supply and entertain trillions/quadrillions of beings across millions of planets and maintain km tall skyscrapers. Their industrial base HAS to be massive, or otherwise they would have died out.



However, you still haven't given proof as to how my math isn't objective. You made the claim. Prove it.

Post Reply