Rebuttal to darkstar's website

For polite and reasoned discussion of Star Wars and/or Star Trek.
Post Reply
Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: Rebuttal to darkstar's website

Post by Mike DiCenso » Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:16 pm

The Dude wrote:
Kor_Dahar_Master wrote:
Of course, you will have to provide evidence that the walls in Cloud City were made from "gypsum or plastics", and you still don't understand that blowing 10 cm holes in walls is on par with modern day grenade launchers.
A 10cm hole in a wall = modern day grenade launcher?.

Where do you get this absurdity from?, a 10cm hole in a wall can be achieved by very small impacts while a grenade launcher would remove a wall or at the very least leave a considerably larger hole in it.
No, it wouldn't. It depends on the type of wall and type of grenade but you don't see Hollywood type damage from grenades in real life. Something like an RPG or Carl G, with a thermobaric warhead, then yeah.
Maybe. SWST is being pretty non-specific in his claims as usual. Let's see what happens in some of these videos here:

Hand grenades

M203 and here again in Iraq.

Looks pretty good compared to what's being claimed.
-Mike

Kor_Dahar_Master
Starship Captain
Posts: 1246
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Rebuttal to darkstar's website

Post by Kor_Dahar_Master » Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:48 pm

The Dude wrote:
No, it wouldn't. It depends on the type of wall and type of grenade but you don't see Hollywood type damage from grenades in real life. Something like an RPG or Carl G, with a thermobaric warhead, then yeah.
I am not talking about hollywood type damage i am talking about thinking that a 10cm hole is a particularly impressive ablity from a sci-fi hand weapon.

The Dude
Jedi Knight
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Rebuttal to darkstar's website

Post by The Dude » Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:26 pm

What exactly are people expecting from small arms in sci-fi? Your using it to kill a man, not a damn tank.

The Dude
Jedi Knight
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Rebuttal to darkstar's website

Post by The Dude » Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:32 pm

Kor_Dahar_Master wrote:
The Dude wrote:
No, it wouldn't. It depends on the type of wall and type of grenade but you don't see Hollywood type damage from grenades in real life. Something like an RPG or Carl G, with a thermobaric warhead, then yeah.
I am not talking about hollywood type damage i am talking about thinking that a 10cm hole is a particularly impressive ablity from a sci-fi hand weapon.
And I'm responding to an erroneous claim regarding modern weapons. Stuff like "a grenade launcher would remove a wall" is where ridiculous things like Hans blaster being compared to a grenade starts.

Kor_Dahar_Master
Starship Captain
Posts: 1246
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Rebuttal to darkstar's website

Post by Kor_Dahar_Master » Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:31 pm

The Dude wrote:
Kor_Dahar_Master wrote:
The Dude wrote:
No, it wouldn't. It depends on the type of wall and type of grenade but you don't see Hollywood type damage from grenades in real life. Something like an RPG or Carl G, with a thermobaric warhead, then yeah.
I am not talking about hollywood type damage i am talking about thinking that a 10cm hole is a particularly impressive ablity from a sci-fi hand weapon.
And I'm responding to an erroneous claim regarding modern weapons. Stuff like "a grenade launcher would remove a wall" is where ridiculous things like Hans blaster being compared to a grenade starts.
But like you say it depends on the type of launcher, the type of grenade and type of wall as is takes very little to knock over a normal brick wall or knock a hole in it.

The Dude
Jedi Knight
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Rebuttal to darkstar's website

Post by The Dude » Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:57 am

Yeah, thats one reason why the comparison is dumb. Theres so many qualifiers (I guess you could say) that the statement itself is meaningless.

Mind you while pondering this I thought of something else. The Stormtrooper uniform is widely considered to provide NBC protection (if sealed obviously) but perhaps the helmet provides a different function; look at all that smoke and debris flying around during the ANH boarding action and later the DS.

Imagine what that does to the lungs of an unprotected human.

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: Rebuttal to darkstar's website

Post by Mike DiCenso » Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:13 am

Dude wrote:The Stormtrooper uniform is widely considered to provide NBC protection (if sealed obviously) but perhaps the helmet provides a different function; look at all that smoke and debris flying around during the ANH boarding action and later the DS.
The only widely held belief that Storm trooper armor has any NBC protection is on SDN and among some of the Warsies on SBC. Outside of some EU material and a brief scene in ANH, there is little evidence of ST armor being able to do that. TCW shows some very limited protection against vaccum conditions for Clone trooper armor, but no NBC against the Blue Shadow virus. If ST armor does have NBC capability, it's not a standard part of the kit.

As for the Tantive boarding action, we saw lots of explosions going off around the Alderaanian troopers, and they didn't seem signficantly more affected. Hell that same armor was useless when the STs got hammered and shot by the Ewoks.
-Mike

The Dude
Jedi Knight
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Rebuttal to darkstar's website

Post by The Dude » Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:20 pm

Yeah thats fascinating stuff about SDN and SBC but its tangential to my actual point, which is that perhaps the helmets offer protection from long term exposure to what is probably plastics and metal in the air.

Hell you can get sick and die from breathing asbestos dust decades ago or develop problems from long term exposure to coal dust and lead.

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Rebuttal to darkstar's website

Post by Praeothmin » Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:52 pm

Concerning the hand weapons in SW, while they most certainly offer the punch of heavy caliber modern hand weapons, they do not have the power a lot of Warsies say.
For example, the cell block attack from Han and Luke saw guards wearing nothing but tunics get blasted, dead center, and their torsos did not explode, even though the impact did yield an explosion each time.
What we see are burn marks, about 10 cm in size, nothing more.
If these weapons were as powerful as Warsies say, then we would have seen much more damage done on those guards...

And while we are on the subject, the more I think about it, and the more it becomes evident Leia was hit with a glancing shot, because the minimum level of damage done by blaster was never so weak as what we saw on Leia's arm...

And lastly, I do also believe the helmets offer some protection to gases, while it may not be total...

The Dude
Jedi Knight
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Rebuttal to darkstar's website

Post by The Dude » Thu Dec 16, 2010 6:38 pm

Yeah just because it offers protection doesn't mean its total. Plenty of evidence of that in modern gear.

I haven't watch the Clone Wars so I don't much care about the Shadow Virus or whatever it is. GL has enough of my cash.

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Rebuttal to darkstar's website

Post by Praeothmin » Thu Dec 16, 2010 7:47 pm

Actually, while the Droids are even dumber than in the PT, the other characters are better develloped than in the movies.
Anakin is far better written, Ashoka, while annoying at first, becomes a better character, and you start seeing Obi-Wan's "good" strategies, and doubts in his pupil...
Plus the ship battles are fun to watch... :)

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: Rebuttal to darkstar's website

Post by Mike DiCenso » Thu Dec 16, 2010 8:18 pm

The Dude wrote:Yeah just because it offers protection doesn't mean its total. Plenty of evidence of that in modern gear.

I haven't watch the Clone Wars so I don't much care about the Shadow Virus or whatever it is. GL has enough of my cash.
That's true, and very possible. However the fact remains that we have yet to see the total coverage that many Warsies on SDN and SBC are claiming for Stormtrooper armor, not to mention the other abilities, like the built-in HUD display with infrared vision and other abilities not even remotely hinted at in the movies and much of the EU or TCW.
-Mike

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: Rebuttal to darkstar's website

Post by Mike DiCenso » Thu Dec 16, 2010 8:18 pm

Praeothmin wrote:Actually, while the Droids are even dumber than in the PT, the other characters are better develloped than in the movies.
Anakin is far better written, Ashoka, while annoying at first, becomes a better character, and you start seeing Obi-Wan's "good" strategies, and doubts in his pupil...
Plus the ship battles are fun to watch... :)
You can also watch them online at Mastertoons for free.
-Mike

User1462
Bridge Officer
Posts: 126
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Rebuttal to darkstar's website

Post by User1462 » Thu Dec 16, 2010 8:27 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:I tried sending darkstar an email refuting some of his points, but it blocked me out, apparently because it thought that I was spam.

The email read like this:



Ok, so I've read a lot of your site. I'll say that your calculations seem to be accurate for the most part and you're clearly knowledgeable on the laws of physics and make some good points. However, I do have a few criticisms to make:

1. Your FTL calculations are simply implausible. Star Wars is a galaxy spanning civilization. Casual travel across large portions of the galaxy is commonplace in Star Wars. However, by your calculations, traveling across the galaxy would take years, sometimes even decades, which Star Wars clearly shows isn't true for them:
Galaxies come in all shapes and sizes, and there's no proof on-screen how big the SW galaxy is while in the novel they say that it's "modest-sized," which means small[i/].
Look at a picture of ours:
Image
You can see how it's immensely spread out, compared to canon-pics of the SW galaxy. That shows ours is about 10 times the diameter of the SW galaxy, and so it's about 1/1000 the size from simple volumetrics. That would mean about 200 million stars, and about as many planets.

a) Obi Wan goes to Kamino, stated to be in the outer rim, casually without any large amount of time passing. Based on your calculations, it would have taken him years to do that.

Or months, dependng on the size of the galaxy. However let's also not forget Special Relativity, and the fact that ship-time can pass at a different rate than galaxy-time.
Kamino could also have been on the space-lanes, but it was erased by Dooku over 10 years earlier.

b) Darth Maul travels across a large portion of the galaxy in a matter of hours.


On-screen? I didn't see any calendars hanging to show the time.

c) In many of the Senate meetings, you see senators representing solar systems across the galaxy. If your travel times were correct, those senators would have to have spent years just to get to Coruscant; which clearly isn't true, because otherwise Padme would have had to have started traveling to Coruscant right after TPM ended.

Again, we don't know the size of the galaxy. Also some routes could be faster, obviously those to Coruscant would be fastest.
Look at a map of any state: the roads to the capital are obviously faster than those to the boondocks.

d) The Millennium Falcon is seen traveling across major portions of the galaxy without any large of time passing
.

Then why was Lando wearing Han's clothes at the end of TESB? Obviously it was long enough for him to need a change. And who said it was a major portion?

e) The Death Star could not possibly have been constructed as fast as it was with transport ships as slow as you claim they are.

It took about 30 years; Luke grew up from infancy to manhood in about half the time it took to construct it. And slow transport ships are solved by simply having large numbers of them.

f) Yoda travels to Kamino, examines the clone troopers, mobilizes them and brings an army to Geonosis in a matter of hours or maybe a day or two. This would have taken years if it were based off of your speed calculations.

I remember reading that Genosians had their games on certain dates, so it could have been any amount of time between their being captured and executed.

2. Your weapons ranges are cherry picking the lowest Star Wars ranges and the highest Star Trek ranges. There are many cases in which Federation ships go within 10 km to hit a HUGE borg cube that wasn't moving that fast relatively either.


Point-blank is always better than long-distance, that doesn't change the max. The Borg could stop a beam from long-distance as well, like the archers in "Braveheart" were unable to harm the Scots, because they could see the arrows coming far in advance and simply held up their shields. Meanwhile they couldn't do this if cavalry road past at full speed and fired arrows without warning, they wouldn't be as able to stop it.

Meanwhile, the Battle of Endor shows Star Wars ships battling at thousands of miles range.

Darkstar says that SW weapons have a 5000 KM range max, so that's thousands of miles.

3. Again, your blaster damage showings cherry picked the lowest showing and ignored the showing of them making giant holes and explosions in other scenes.

More like those calculations are exaggerated, like saying meteors were "vapourized" when they were simply shattered. Anyone who's even played the game "Asteroids" knows that they don't disappear when you shoot them, just break into littler ones. And that's what happens in the movie too. Including the Seismic charges, they simply smash the asteroids like Memorex shatters a glass, they don't vapourize them.

4. Your imperial fleet size estimates are sketchy, since they're based off of casual conversations in which the characters would not be speaking in precise.

But they wouldn't say "thousands" if they meant "millions." No one with a clue would say that there were "thousands of soldiers fighting in WWII," when it was obviously millions.

6. You analyze the AT-ST, but not the many other more powerful Star Wars ground vehicles, and other Star Wars ground troops. I'll admit that the AT-ST is a joke of a vehicle, but it isn't the only military vehicle available to Star Wars; note that Star Trek doesn't have any.

Ground vehicles are a sign that a society is primitive, it would be like riding horses today: people only do it for nostalgia, or the fact that they are primitive.

7. You ignore the huge population and industrial disparity and how Star Wars is at least several thousand times larger than Star Trek.


Compare the Senate-chamber in the prequels, to the Federation chamber in "The Undiscovered Country." There aren't several thousand times as many seats there. More like ten times, at most.
Likewise, Star Wars doesn't have the Prime Directive, so the Repubic populates every planet they come across, which is why their technology and culture is so monolithic.
Meanwhile those of the Federation galaxy were so different, that they can combine to form a synergy of untold power ala "Nomad."
The Federation's strength is in its diversity, not just its size, and they value that so much that they refuse to taint the unique indviduality of pre-warp worlds by infesting them with post-warp technology.

Star Wars would therefore have vast industrial capabilities and a vast recruiting pool, allowing them to overwhelm Star Trek even if the ship firepower were comparable.

1. Star Trek replicators renders any such advantage moot, since they can produce just about anything in any amount, while SW industry is too dedicated; likewise it's monopolized among factions like the the Techno-union, Trade Federation and Banking Guilds who resist any competition. In short, the whole galaxy is glutted and stagnant.
Meanwhile ST is all an open market.

2. There's no comparison between ST and SW firepower, when ST weapons can destroy a star with a little torpedo, or destroy a planet with a Genesis device. Meanwhile SW needs a giant 120km station to destroy a planet.

8. While Star Wars hyperdrive is fast enough and long ranged enough for them to invade the Federation if the two sides are somehow close enough for this scenario to happen,


WHOAH, HOLD ON there cowboy! The G-canon ony says they can travel in the galaxy, not outside of it; the officer in TESB says that the Falcon can go anywhere in the galaxy, not outside of it.
And that means they can't travel even to nearby galaxies, while theirs is far, far away from ours: hundreds or thousands of galaxies away. So it's impossible for them to get here..

the Federation would not be able to mount an invasion on any Star Wars galactic government.

Not with their ships, but they could do it with other tech like warp-conduits, wormhole-travel, time-travel etc.
The Federation might also be able to do it using the DS9 wormhole, since the aliens there operate outside of linear time and space, particularly since Sisko is on of them and he's a Starfleet captain!
How many wormhole-aliens officers does Empire have, pal?

Federation warp drive wouldn't even have enough fuel to get to the core worlds,

The fuel regenerates ("The Mark of Gideon," TOS3).
Also they could use the same space-lanes as the other ships, so they could move even faster via their superior engines.

nor would they know how to get there (after centuries of exploring the Federation hasn't mapped out its own galaxy yet, so mapping out that of another one would be infeasible in any short amount of time) or sustain any supply line.


Unless they scanned them from a single ship in the galaxy, or simply hacked into the Empire's computers and hijacked their entire comm-system and network from online; remember that the Federation's engineers even impressed the Vorta.
For example in "I, Borg," and "Best of Both Worlds" they were able to figure out how to destroy Borg just by using hacking and computer-viruses, so they could do the same to the Empire too. Every computer, droid and ship would be under complete Federation control, particularly since the Federation has an android that can think, the Empire doesn't (except for R2D2, and he can't talk).
Last edited by User1462 on Thu Dec 16, 2010 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

The Dude
Jedi Knight
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Rebuttal to darkstar's website

Post by The Dude » Thu Dec 16, 2010 8:39 pm

Mike DiCenso wrote:
The Dude wrote:Yeah just because it offers protection doesn't mean its total. Plenty of evidence of that in modern gear.

I haven't watch the Clone Wars so I don't much care about the Shadow Virus or whatever it is. GL has enough of my cash.
That's true, and very possible. However the fact remains that we have yet to see the total coverage that many Warsies on SDN and SBC are claiming for Stormtrooper armor, not to mention the other abilities, like the built-in HUD display with infrared vision and other abilities not even remotely hinted at in the movies and much of the EU or TCW.
-Mike
Yeah, I temper things like that with real life experience. Only a total fool (or a shut in geek) would assume total coverage or that advances can't be made in NBC warfare to defeat current protection.

Post Reply