Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

For polite and reasoned discussion of Star Wars and/or Star Trek.
Post Reply
Lucky
Jedi Master
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

Post by Lucky » Mon Sep 20, 2010 7:46 am

Mike DiCenso wrote:
The two weapons of the Jem'Hadar and the Mokra Order are not the same thing. The phased ion canons are still ion weaponary that damages the shields of a Federation starship.
-Mike
They would be ion weapons with an unknown technobabble component?

KirkSkyWalker
Jedi Knight
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

Post by KirkSkyWalker » Mon Sep 20, 2010 3:20 pm

Mike DiCenso wrote:
KirkSkywalker wrote: In the year 2268, not 1968; mind the context.
Hardly much of a difference. The term old style means that it's an out of date weapon that works very much like any nuclear weapon we have now in real life.
No, it means compared to the type they used in 2268.
KirkSkywalker wrote:Ok, 92 seconds-- not bad for the ship just having been nuked 300 yards from ground zero.
That's a minimum amount of time since there is a cut between the E-1701 being nuked, and the Romulans going all happy about it, then back to the E-1701, then back to the Romulans with possibly some extra time passing there. Had the Romulan commander not hesitated as soon the as the big E was nuked, and pressed an attack, he'd have won. Or had he simply Decius tossed in the brig and ordered his ship to go home, he'd also have won.

92 seconds of lead-time wouldn't make him home-free.
KirkSkywalker wrote:What part of "phased" did you not understand? The Jem H'dar also used phased polaron-beams to render UFP shields useless, but it's also clearly out of anything even close to of SW's league.
The two weapons of the Jem'Hadar and the Mokra Order are not the same thing. The phased ion canons are still ion weaponary that damages the shields of a Federation starship.
-Mike

KirkSkyWalker
Jedi Knight
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

Post by KirkSkyWalker » Mon Sep 20, 2010 3:22 pm

Mike DiCenso wrote:
KirkSkywalker wrote: In the year 2268, not 1968; mind the context.
Hardly much of a difference. The term old style means that it's an out of date weapon that works very much like any nuclear weapon we have now in real life.
No, it means old compared to the type they used in 2268.
KirkSkywalker wrote:Ok, 92 seconds-- not bad for the ship just having been nuked 300 yards from ground zero.
That's a minimum amount of time since there is a cut between the E-1701 being nuked, and the Romulans going all happy about it, then back to the E-1701, then back to the Romulans with possibly some extra time passing there. Had the Romulan commander not hesitated as soon the as the big E was nuked, and pressed an attack, he'd have won. Or had he simply Decius tossed in the brig and ordered his ship to go home, he'd also have won.
92 seconds of lead-time wouldn't make him home-free, their power was sheer impulse.
KirkSkywalker wrote:What part of "phased" did you not understand? The Jem H'dar also used phased polaron-beams to render UFP shields useless, but it's also clearly out of anything even close to of SW's league.
The two weapons of the Jem'Hadar and the Mokra Order are not the same thing. The phased ion canons are still ion weaponary that damages the shields of a Federation starship.
-Mike
But SW doesn't have phasing-technology, that's beyond warp.

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

Post by Praeothmin » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:30 pm

KirkSkywalker wrote:
Praeothmin wrote:
KirkSkywalker wrote:but it's also clearly out of anything even close to of SW's league.
And you conlcude that how?
They don't have anything like it.
SW has "Transporter Gates" from old civilizations, they have Disruptor weapons that are very similar to Phasers in their effects, they have gravity plating, anti-grav, Hyperdrive and a Galaxy spanning Holonet, like ST's Subspace Arrays.
They have Lightsabres, weapons that create solid energy fields that cut through any material, some easier then others, and when only ignited, they use no power.
They have the Metal-Crystal Phase Shifter, a superweapon capable of altering the molecular structure of metallic substances, a weapon that would be able to penetrate the shields of a starship and damage its hull, much like the Phased weapons of the Dominion...
Also, the Amban phase-pulse blaster, which was a phase-pulse blaster used around 0 ABY...

They do indeed seem to have phased weaponry...

KirkSkyWalker
Jedi Knight
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

Post by KirkSkyWalker » Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:21 am

Praeothmin wrote: SW has "Transporter Gates" from old civilizations, they have Disruptor weapons that are very similar to Phasers in their effects, they have gravity plating, anti-grav, Hyperdrive and a Galaxy spanning Holonet, like ST's Subspace Arrays.
They have Lightsabres, weapons that create solid energy fields that cut through any material, some easier then others, and when only ignited, they use no power.
They have the Metal-Crystal Phase Shifter, a superweapon capable of altering the molecular structure of metallic substances, a weapon that would be able to penetrate the shields of a starship and damage its hull, much like the Phased weapons of the Dominion...
Also, the Amban phase-pulse blaster, which was a phase-pulse blaster used around 0 ABY...

They do indeed seem to have phased weaponry...

Ok if you don't know by now that we're NOT talking about the EU, there's no hope your ever realizing it.

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

Post by Praeothmin » Tue Sep 21, 2010 4:55 pm

KirkSkywalker wrote: Ok if you don't know by now that we're NOT talking about the EU, there's no hope your ever realizing it.
Ok, if you don't realize by now we're talking about SW, which includes the EU, there's no hope of you ever realizing it...

And from TCW, they also have cloaking devices on small ships, à la ST, which means they know how to use gravitons to bend signals and diffuse them as well...

User avatar
Who is like God arbour
Starship Captain
Posts: 1155
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:00 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

Post by Who is like God arbour » Wed Sep 22, 2010 7:19 am

Praeothmin wrote:And from TCW, they also have cloaking devices on small ships, à la ST, which means they know how to use gravitons to bend signals and diffuse them as well...
To jump from » they also have cloaking devices « to » they know how to use gravitons to bend signals and diffuse them « is quite a leap.

A cloaking device does not have to use gravitons to bend signals and diffuse them.
There are other ways to render an object invisible, e.g. metamaterial cloaking, active camouflage or adaptive camouflage or plasma stealth.

The question is, how the in the TCW showed cloaking device worked.

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

Post by Praeothmin » Wed Sep 22, 2010 6:38 pm

W.I.L.G.A, all these techniques can fool modern radars, but the movies and TCW shows us that, while SW sensors are not up to par with ST sensors, they are still better then radars...

From what I could tell, the cloak was pretty much like a ST cloak.
I'll try to find a link to a video tonight...

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

Post by Praeothmin » Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:11 pm

Ok, I checked this threadhere, and it seems that the cloak isn't like ST cloaks...

But the Empire still has gravity plates, and anti-grav units, which means they DO know how to use "gravitons"...

KirkSkyWalker
Jedi Knight
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

Post by KirkSkyWalker » Sat Sep 25, 2010 1:28 am

Praeothmin wrote:Ok, I checked this threadhere, and it seems that the cloak isn't like ST cloaks...

But the Empire still has gravity plates, and anti-grav units, which means they DO know how to use "gravitons"...
Where's that shown in the G-canon?
Praeothmin wrote:
KirkSkywalker wrote: Ok if you don't know by now that we're NOT talking about the EU, there's no hope your ever realizing it.
Ok, if you don't realize by now we're talking about SW, which includes the EU, there's no hope of you ever realizing it...
Because it isn't REAL, i.e. accurate; and so you aren't realizing, by definition, but fantasizing. SW doesn't include the EU in the on-screen universe-- the EU is a separate universe.

And from TCW, they also have cloaking devices on small ships, à la ST, which means they know how to use gravitons to bend signals and diffuse them as well...
Yeah yeah, and Anakin has a Padawan that looks like King Tut in TCW.
But not in the G-canon. Just ike Boba Fett is dead in the G-canon.

Lucky
Jedi Master
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

Post by Lucky » Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:49 am

KirkSkywalker wrote:
Praeothmin wrote:Ok, I checked this threadhere, and it seems that the cloak isn't like ST cloaks...

But the Empire still has gravity plates, and anti-grav units, which means they DO know how to use "gravitons"...
KirkSkywalker wrote:Where's that shown in the G-canon?
I believe Praeothmin is referring to repulsor lifts, and the artificial gravity on ships, but I don't know where we are told how ships produce A.G., or how repulsor lifts work in Star Wars.

If you take T-canon then Star Wars cloaks don't hide magnetic fields well, and we never see a gravity sensor. All sensors seem to be based on sensing electromagnetic radiation and magnetic fields.

If you go down to C-canon then you have the Vong who where a threat more or less because the GFFA tech base is not very good at manipulating gravity, and big rare gravity sensors.

KirkSkyWalker
Jedi Knight
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

Post by KirkSkyWalker » Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:50 am

A "repulsor lift" would theoretically work just as well in space, as it would on a planet; since gravity from inertia, is the same as gravity from a planet. However all that we see in SW films for actual take-off, is ion-drive thrusters. The only real anti-gravity tech we see in the G-canon, is the little disc that Yoda floats on, Luke's speeder, the hover-bikes on Endor etc. and possibly the troop-transports carrying the Clones on Coruscant at the end of AotC-- i.e. nothing more than a few feet off the ground at most.

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

Post by Praeothmin » Sun Sep 26, 2010 2:42 am

And we see, in ships of all sizes, gravity plates where people can walk as if on planet with no difference, without the ship needing to gyrate in space to simulate gravity.
They know how to control gravitons, as clearly seen in G-canon... :)

User avatar
Who is like God arbour
Starship Captain
Posts: 1155
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:00 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

Post by Who is like God arbour » Sun Sep 26, 2010 5:29 am

Praeothmin wrote:They know how to control gravitons, as clearly seen in G-canon... :)
That's again quite a leap.

They may know how to "create" gravitons as mankind knew how to "create" photons for a long time - even before it knew that there are such things like photons.

But as mankind didn't really knew that there are such things like photons and even now its ability to "control" photons is very limited, we can not simply assume, that they are able to "control" gravitons.

There are many people out there, who are claiming to have created a device that can either create gravity or anti-gravity. Among them are even "scientists" like Martin Tajmar or Eugene Podkletnov. Even if we assume that their experiments were successful and they had indeed created a kind of gravity or ant-gravity device, although then we would be able to create gravitation or anti-gravitation, as we are able to create light and darkness, we would not be able to "control" gravitons.

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Nature of Empire vs. Federation technology

Post by Praeothmin » Mon Sep 27, 2010 3:38 pm

WILGA wrote:
Praeothmin wrote:They know how to control gravitons, as clearly seen in G-canon... :)
That's again quite a leap.

They may know how to "create" gravitons as mankind knew how to "create" photons for a long time - even before it knew that there are such things like photons.

But as mankind didn't really knew that there are such things like photons and even now its ability to "control" photons is very limited, we can not simply assume, that they are able to "control" gravitons.

There are many people out there, who are claiming to have created a device that can either create gravity or anti-gravity. Among them are even "scientists" like Martin Tajmar or Eugene Podkletnov. Even if we assume that their experiments were successful and they had indeed created a kind of gravity or ant-gravity device, although then we would be able to create gravitation or anti-gravitation, as we are able to create light and darkness, we would not be able to "control" gravitons.
Yoda's repulsor chair shows them negating gravity as well (it's certainly not a jet or thruster equipment, since it has no visible exaust), and gravity plates shows them creating, or simulating, gravity.
They have gravity sensors as well.
What more do you require?
How can you control things that much, measure it so precisely, but have no knowledge on how to manipulate it?

Post Reply