Gigaton-level phasers?

For polite and reasoned discussion of Star Wars and/or Star Trek.
Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: Gigaton-level phasers?

Post by Mike DiCenso » Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:06 pm

Mr Oragahan wrote:The most amusing aspect of this is that the tritanium has been melted, yet the vegetation around the plank
You can't be serious. The planet had been rendered lifeless for some time given how some many of the structures were buried or looked serverely uncared for. What you were seeing was probably relatively recent planet growth. You can see in the video here that the weapon and equipment was completely covered in vines and other growth. Given the rather tropical forest type vegetation, this is not suprising as it only takes months or a few years to get overgrown like that. So no big suprise in that we do not see any scorched trees or plants.
-Mike

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: Gigaton-level phasers?

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:56 am

Mike DiCenso wrote:Several major problems here with this.

- The phasers in "Mask" were stated as being set to widespread, and that is what we see as the phasers first fire in the normal narrow beam, then within a couple seconds widen out many times this and were continuing to widen even when the scene cut. I know Oragahn doesn't like this fact as it goes against his whole thesis, but it was stated and shown, and would allow for even heating of the comet's outer layers as well as reduce fragmentation from rapid thermal expansion.
I'm curious as to how you're going to prove that spreading near exawatt firepower over a wide arc is not going to pulverize the ice faster than you can actually melt it.
We already see the oddity of a concentrated petawatt firing (10% of max) isn't already breaking the ice but niftly makes it disappear, or shrink downwards.
It mostly looks like it's being NDFed with residual heat that piles up. And eventually, if you argue that ice doesn't break because they're not already at 10% of max firepower, then what's the level, and how do you expect ice not to crack and the comet to break apart, and why do you think the comet fragmenting wouldn't actually help making the process much faster?
They wouldn't even need to melt all the ice, not because as I pointed out they had planned to melt only half of it since they'd stop as they'd have reached the core, but because the station was right under the surface of the comet, and so there was no point even attempting vaporizing all the ice of the hemisphere they faced. They sheer application of energy would act as a thruster to the block of ice and propel it away after the entirety of the station would be dislodged.
That's going by visuals of course, but going with dialogue will certainly not help either, since without visuals we have absolutely no time frame at all.
Note that I don't deny the widening. There's no allusion to that in my post because I don't see how relevant it is.
- Captain Tracy's killing of the Yangs is also somewhat flawed as we see thoughout the episode that the guy loved running around firing his phaser on full disintegration mode. He uses this several times on-screen when he vapes Lt. Galloway, the redshirt of the week, then a computer Spock was trying to rig to send a message for help to the Enterprise (Spock suffers life-threatening injuries since he was next to it clearly indicating whatever it is phasers do on this setting is not completely without dangerous effect to those nearby), and then when chasing Kirk through the streets of the village, Tracy fires and misses Kirk, hitting a rain barrel, and making it vape away.

Prior to the final Yang attack, and before Kirk and company arrived on the scene, he had killed hundreds of Yang raiders, which did leave bodies, or some remains behind that Spock and Galloway while out scouting the area could find along with abandoned phaser power packs. Tracy may still have tried to scare them off with a massive show of force at that time, leaving bodies as a warning, but when push came to shove, he opened up with everything he had.
That you don't know.
I did consider attempts at scaring them off with big booms and other impressive displays of firepower, although nothing says this happened, but obviously the awesome display of firepower didn't stop the Yangs from sending thousands of men at his group, and therefore Tracy would have had to quickly rethink his position and it's quite obvious that against large numbers he had to settle on the levels which would be good enough to kill and that's all, considering that they were stuck there with very limited ammo.
His tendency to use disintegration later on can be entirely related to the arrival of new ammo packs and UFP officers threatening his power.
In this context, two to three digit kilojoule shost per Yang is damn logical and reasonable, and 1 MJ is really pushing it, although that's the figure I went with, which kinda makes it a high end.
Another thing to keep in mind is that the Kohm henchmen probably only had minimal training with the phasers they had stolen from the Enterprise landing party, so we cannot expect them to use the phasers properly as a trained Starfleet captain or other personel would.
They don't auto-aim anymore? Not to say that they'd be settled to what's considered good enough for them. You wouldn't want these guys to start firing modern anti-tank levels of firepower when they have minimal training. Not that it would take much training either: shorts burts, aim in the direction, press button. Nothing fancy. It's probably even easier than using a modern firearm by a long margin.
- One the "The Pegasus", the E-D and Pegasus were far more than 2 km below the surface of the asteroid as once the cloak engages and the E-D stars moving, it takes several seconds for them to reach the still glowing plug and then a second or two passing inside the rock that Worf reports that they have passed through 2 kilometers of the asteroid and are within a kilometer of the surface. Thus three km total. You can see the entire scene here from 1:00 onward. The total depth into the asteroid teh two ships were at is probably closer to 4 km given the time it took the E-D to reach the rock.
-Mike
I already stated three kilometers, and it's obviously not really "far more" than two, especially at the scale of a ship such as the E-D.

Mike DiCenso wrote:
Mr Oragahan wrote:The most amusing aspect of this is that the tritanium has been melted, yet the vegetation around the plank
You can't be serious. The planet had been rendered lifeless for some time given how some many of the structures were buried or looked serverely uncared for. What you were seeing was probably relatively recent planet growth. You can see in the video here that the weapon and equipment was completely covered in vines and other growth. Given the rather tropical forest type vegetation, this is not suprising as it only takes months or a few years to get overgrown like that. So no big suprise in that we do not see any scorched trees or plants.
-Mike
You could be right. I was under the impression that this happened earlier but I missed Picard's suggestion that this may have taken place during the Romulan wars. A while back, in other words.
It's a secondary observation though, nothing important in regards to my arguments.

User avatar
Mith
Starship Captain
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:17 am

Re: Gigaton-level phasers?

Post by Mith » Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:33 am

As in regards to the armor plate--was she refering to their hand weapons perhaps? Ie, it would make a great deal more sense that they couldn't penetrate tritanium with their hand phasers rather than their phasers. We've seen entire sections of starships blown apart and vaporized by phasers in Trek--and that does involve some heat, despite what some people suggest.

I also believe there was one instance where Sisko told Kira to forget blasting her way through some door or wall or something, as it was made of tritanium. Yeah, it's possible that I'm wrong, but maybe her tricorder had revealed that no heavy weapons had been used in that particular area and she concluded that it had to of been done by an advanced hand-held weapon.

It's a stretch, admittedly.

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: Gigaton-level phasers?

Post by Mike DiCenso » Fri Aug 20, 2010 4:12 am

This is what I was responding to:

"They found the Pegasus 2 km beneath the surface of the asteroid, and the seal was in front of them, but we don't know if it filled the entrance up to the surface."

If you intended a different description of the scene, then my apologies.
-Mike

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: Gigaton-level phasers?

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Fri Aug 20, 2010 4:21 am

Mith wrote:As in regards to the armor plate--was she refering to their hand weapons perhaps? Ie, it would make a great deal more sense that they couldn't penetrate tritanium with their hand phasers rather than their phasers. We've seen entire sections of starships blown apart and vaporized by phasers in Trek--and that does involve some heat, despite what some people suggest.

I also believe there was one instance where Sisko told Kira to forget blasting her way through some door or wall or something, as it was made of tritanium. Yeah, it's possible that I'm wrong, but maybe her tricorder had revealed that no heavy weapons had been used in that particular area and she concluded that it had to of been done by an advanced hand-held weapon.

It's a stretch, admittedly.
A huge one. It presupposes that these three people, with their phasers, couldn't even melt a small portion of the inch thick plate even after emptying their weapons.
I'd be much interesting in having a look at the quote you refer to about the door or wall. It also does seem to contradict what you said just above about phasers blowing stuff up inside starships.

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: Gigaton-level phasers?

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Fri Aug 20, 2010 4:26 am

Mike DiCenso wrote:This is what I was responding to:

"They found the Pegasus 2 km beneath the surface of the asteroid, and the seal was in front of them, but we don't know if it filled the entrance up to the surface."

If you intended a different description of the scene, then my apologies.
-Mike
They say the ship is two km deep, but then when they speak about moving away they talk about going through three km of stuff. It's possible that they turned or something, but I doubt it.
It's more like a contradiction about one kilometer in the figure.

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Gigaton-level phasers?

Post by Praeothmin » Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:06 pm

Mith wrote:As in regards to the armor plate--was she refering to their hand weapons perhaps? Ie, it would make a great deal more sense that they couldn't penetrate tritanium with their hand phasers rather than their phasers. We've seen entire sections of starships blown apart and vaporized by phasers in Trek--and that does involve some heat, despite what some people suggest.

I also believe there was one instance where Sisko told Kira to forget blasting her way through some door or wall or something, as it was made of tritanium. Yeah, it's possible that I'm wrong, but maybe her tricorder had revealed that no heavy weapons had been used in that particular area and she concluded that it had to of been done by an advanced hand-held weapon.

It's a stretch, admittedly.
You are correct, Sisko and Kira fire at an inch-thick bulkhead made of Tritanium, the same thing used in Starship hulls, and Sisko states that their Phasers, the ones they are holding, i.e., Hand Phasers, cannot penetrate or affect Tritanium.
Nothing about ship Phasers, which is logical since, as you stated, we've seen ship Phasers vaporize, blow or cut through ship hulls before.
Also, we know Phasers at setting 7 can vaporize materials with a vaporization point ot 2 thousnad something degrees, while the same setting barely leaves burn marks on a shuttle when Geordi is making it look like the shuttle has been fired upon in the TNG Cardassian defector episode.
And while we're at it, when have they ever stated that the "leave small burn marks on uniforms" setting is setting 7?

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: Gigaton-level phasers?

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:31 pm

Praeothmin wrote:
Mith wrote:As in regards to the armor plate--was she refering to their hand weapons perhaps? Ie, it would make a great deal more sense that they couldn't penetrate tritanium with their hand phasers rather than their phasers. We've seen entire sections of starships blown apart and vaporized by phasers in Trek--and that does involve some heat, despite what some people suggest.

I also believe there was one instance where Sisko told Kira to forget blasting her way through some door or wall or something, as it was made of tritanium. Yeah, it's possible that I'm wrong, but maybe her tricorder had revealed that no heavy weapons had been used in that particular area and she concluded that it had to of been done by an advanced hand-held weapon.

It's a stretch, admittedly.
You are correct, Sisko and Kira fire at an inch-thick bulkhead made of Tritanium, the same thing used in Starship hulls, and Sisko states that their Phasers, the ones they are holding, i.e., Hand Phasers, cannot penetrate or affect Tritanium.
Nothing about ship Phasers, which is logical since, as you stated, we've seen ship Phasers vaporize, blow or cut through ship hulls before.
Also, we know Phasers at setting 7 can vaporize materials with a vaporization point ot 2 thousnad something degrees, while the same setting barely leaves burn marks on a shuttle when Geordi is making it look like the shuttle has been fired upon in the TNG Cardassian defector episode.
And while we're at it, when have they ever stated that the "leave small burn marks on uniforms" setting is setting 7?
[citation needed]

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Gigaton-level phasers?

Post by Praeothmin » Fri Aug 20, 2010 4:46 pm

DS9 episode, in either seasons 1, 2, 3 or 5 'cause they're the ones I have.
TNG episode, either seasons 1, 2, 4 or 6, for the same reason above...

Seriously, I don't write everything down dammit... :)

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: Gigaton-level phasers?

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:29 pm

Praeothmin wrote:DS9 episode, in either seasons 1, 2, 3 or 5 'cause they're the ones I have.
TNG episode, either seasons 1, 2, 4 or 6, for the same reason above...

Seriously, I don't write everything down dammit... :)
I'm afraid this won't be enough.
Throw him into the pit of fire!

411-RED
Redshirt
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Gigaton-level phasers?

Post by 411-RED » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:35 pm

If you're asking for episode citations, then I believe it was Lower Decks where a type three phaser was only leaving burn marks on the shuttle's hull, and in Arsenal of Freedom, Data said it was "beyond our ability to melt tritanium", or something along those lines. In The Forsaken, Kira was going to try and blast through a door with a hand phaser, and Sisko said it would be useless. I'm not sure what the doors on DS9 are composed of, though.

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: Gigaton-level phasers?

Post by Mike DiCenso » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:03 pm

Mr. Oragahn wrote:
Mike DiCenso wrote:This is what I was responding to:

"They found the Pegasus 2 km beneath the surface of the asteroid, and the seal was in front of them, but we don't know if it filled the entrance up to the surface."

If you intended a different description of the scene, then my apologies.
-Mike
They say the ship is two km deep, but then when they speak about moving away they talk about going through three km of stuff. It's possible that they turned or something, but I doubt it.
It's more like a contradiction about one kilometer in the figure.
What? When they enter the asteroid, Data states 2 km, but it takes them a considerable bit of time before they reach the Pegasus itself as seen here in this video starting around 9:09, and they do not reach the Pegaus until at least 9:45, or about 36 seconds later. Given that the ship appears to be doing about 50 meters a second inside the fissure, that means they went another 1,800 m deeper, which is consistent with the later 3 km of rock statements.
-Mike

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: Gigaton-level phasers?

Post by Mike DiCenso » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:14 pm

411-RED wrote:If you're asking for episode citations, then I believe it was Lower Decks where a type three phaser was only leaving burn marks on the shuttle's hull, and in Arsenal of Freedom, Data said it was "beyond our ability to melt tritanium", or something along those lines. In The Forsaken, Kira was going to try and blast through a door with a hand phaser, and Sisko said it would be useless. I'm not sure what the doors on DS9 are composed of, though.

We had a thread on this some years ago as well as dealing with DET-like effects shown by phasers throughout Trek.

The the bulkhead Sisko and Kira were trying to cut through in "The Forsaken" was stated to be toranium inlay.
-Mike

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Gigaton-level phasers?

Post by Praeothmin » Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:13 pm

411-RED wrote:If you're asking for episode citations, then I believe it was Lower Decks where a type three phaser was only leaving burn marks on the shuttle's hull, and in Arsenal of Freedom, Data said it was "beyond our ability to melt tritanium", or something along those lines. In The Forsaken, Kira was going to try and blast through a door with a hand phaser, and Sisko said it would be useless. I'm not sure what the doors on DS9 are composed of, though.
Yes, the DS9 episode is "The Forsaken".
I knew I'd remember eventually... I mean, thanks 411-RED... ;)

*Edit: Damn it Mike, I hate you... In a polite way, of course... :) *

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: Gigaton-level phasers?

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:02 pm

"Forsaken", at 20 seconds.
Phasers at maximum do indeed NDF stuff away, but thermal side effects are also present.
They quickly eat away the surface coating but can't get through the toranium inlay.
Later on they get those bipolar torches but it takes time to do anything worth it.

I noticed that alloys handle NDF effects much better than basic elements. It's more than obvious in how hulls handle them well while things like rock compounds don't and can get drilled through very fast. Now you always get some exceptions due to plot needs, but they seem to be very few.Problems being that according to plot needs, sometimes it just doesn't work either, and those fantastic phasers just seem to lose their almost magical properties, like when being incapable of disposing of a pesky yet unusual asteroid, or being incapable of getting through a recently melted and still glowing rock cap in Pegasus.

Still, as far as "Lower Decks" goes, see a very short burst effect on the hull of the shuttle here.

And thanks to 411 for the information.

Post Reply