Vulcan, the desert planet, had 6 billion people in nTrek, which despite the 20 year difference, I can't see the populations being that different. Same as 23rd Century Earth from the same movie. And while yes, some can be much lower, I also suspect that some are also much higher. That's why I take average.
Much higher? We've only seen Gideon, and it was depicted as a problem-planet.
While this is true, I would also point out that the Federation has plenty of space. In every century, they've had plenty of space for its culture. Even Earth, the paradise of the Federation, has only 6 billion people there, despite being the capital. It's actually almost unrealistic, but then again, I guess it's not hard to see if you're having trouble buying or obtaining estate, why you might want to instead just decide to move to a colony or to Mars.
Yes but people moving will hardly explain why your capital world is lacking several billions, as there's simply not enough old colonies and people to get so many billions.
We'll see more later on.
Colonies are inhabited. Worlds purely for that purpose are refered to as outposts. Ie, science outposts and the like, but even worlds focused on industry are populated to some extent.
...
Um, is there? Honestly, it's really just the newer ones that we saw if my memory serves me well.
...
And that was also 200 years ago. I honestly can't imagine that with abudence in room and technology and a desire to turn a untamed world into something great, that we wouldn't be seeing high millions or low billions 200 years later.
It doesn't really matter how old they are. Even a hundred or thousand people won't matter much even one full millennium later. You need a bigger exodus, but evidence of such population moves would be necessary. We have Archer IV, but that's pretty much all thus far.
That one is funny. It says: Population at the time of Jesus : 300 M.
And it took us 1980 years to multiply that by ten.
Um, actually it was. There's more than the Federation, Romulans, and Klingons in those quadrants. Many of which could have turned the side for either during the war. The Dominion had to keep a clean nose. They never bombarded any planet, save for Cardassia Prime, and that was when the shit had already hit the fan and the Founder was doing it out of spite.
The Dominion fleet located at Cardassia and engaged in other places was a large threat to the UFP, the Klingons and the Romulans. Aside from the Founders suffering from the virus thing, there was no glorious end coming.
Even with slow ass warp travel, it would take perhaps two generations for the entire Dominion forces, coming from the Gamma Quadrant, to threaten the AQ. They would push a colonial corridor from their original quadrant towards the AQ, creating colonies in order to sustain the fleet and using them as outposts, while the AQ Dominion fleet would keep the AQ forces at hand's reach and occupy them.
It would only get worse.
Besides, the Dominion did try to burst a star, one of strategical importance. See
here.
All indicators show that it could only escalate.
The way the war was going, there is no way it would have lasted a century. Even with all six powers in the war (and remember, the estimation actually came before the Romulans joined, though assumed it even if they did), it only lasted three years and both sides were left in ruin. The Federation fleet was worn down, the Klingons were spent, the Dominion forces were all but reduced to nothing, the Cardassians barely had anything left, and only the Romulans and Breen could probably have kept going--and the Breen were a rather small power like the Cardassians themselves.
It might have lasted a decade.
It only means all of them had lost a large percentage of their powers. The battles would then be fought between less ships. But the outcome would be the same in terms of control, and with one ship having enough firepower to turn a planet into a smoking cinder, you have what it takes to wipe out close to billions per planet with one such ship. The moment one does it, the other side will have to do something of equal importance to avoid a defeat. Striking entire populations will be seen as necessary, simply because with reduced military numbers, destroying the population centers crushes morale and industry. It also avoid bothering managing prisoners. The Founders wouldn't bother, since they have their own slave races, one of them which they can mass produce.
And as pointed above, there's always the threat of the Dominion fleet getting reinforcements from the GQ.
Even if you say that the UFP, Klingons and Romulans totaled like 100,000 ships, with crews of 10,000 on the average, you only get 1 bn people in the fleet. You'll certainly NOT get much more from ground troops. Considering how ground troops are treated in Trek, it's almost unlikely that there would be more of them on the war front than there are people in ships engaged in combat.
So those 900 simply cannot be purely military casualties.
Most of this death toll is actually coming in the form of countless civilian death, either via collateral damage, which is unlikely, or via purposeful destruction of worlds, regardless of their relevance, military wise.
I also dispute the 10% you used earlier on. For example, taking the US forces, and when you consider that it's the most aggressive and powerful force on Earth as now, you still have less than 0.5% of its US population that is part of its armed forces, all five branches counted.
I don't think so. The only massive bombardment that the Dominion actually ever planned was Earth because that's where they believed that a rebellion would start. It's actually pretty dark when you think about it, because those experts predicted that the rebellion would in fact, have started and Earth and have gained power. If Sisko and Starfleet had gone through with their suggestion, Weyoun would have had Earth's population eradicated.
Earth was one of the most protected worlds. Clearly with all sides losing military power, they'd be forced to fight for frontier worlds before managing to pierce enemy lines. You'd literally get trench warfare in space, both sides solidifying their holdings.
I really made a mistake with the territory thing here. Because logically, they'd be tens of thousands of light years on the fringe of Imperium space. Even at a full scale war, it would take decades for many of their forces to get there and it all wouldn't be at the same time.
The same would apply to the IoM. The UFP has an advantage though, in the way people explain Voyager's trip duration to make it fit with other incidences of much faster travel.
You need, basically, a detailed chart, you caves full of goods, and that's all. That's how Voyager shaved off a handful of years. I don't think the IoM has any protocol to avoid an enemy acquiring data about the imperial starmap. Considering the silliness of IoM bureaucracy, they could never manage to pull that off.
So they key goal here is to obtain charts, charts and more charts. I'm not exactly sure how hard it would be. The IoM is more like Star Wars's galaxy, but with much more shit and violence in it, and with a FTL system that is subject to random phenomena.
There also are many civil commercial ships the UFP could try to capture. They'd be the easiest preys, and they'd contain large amounts of data on the IoM's spatial organization.
It wouldn't take more than a year imho for the UFP to get that data, even if they need to lose several ships doing so.
The IoM, on the other hand, looks pretty much capped on its FTL speeds no matter what, and there's like a very vague idea of what a Warp without Chaos and without the Astronomican would be like.
Some people assume that a calmer Warp would allow for faster travel, or at least something around low multiples of 1,000-10,000c, but considering that it's a fact that Astropaths use Warp
currents to move around, a calm Warp would have little currents at all to exploit. It would be like being stuck on a calm sea with no wind, and needing to move around with sheer muscle force.
Considering the setting of WH40K, I wouldn't even be surprised if that was what they were going for... :)
The problem is though, in order to destroy the Federation, they'd need to not only push them out of their space, but also take over the Federation. That could take centuries. And while that's not a problem for the Imperium in most cases, it's a bit different here due to the pace at which the UFP is going to advance.
Interesting. Why do you think it would take centuries here while you thought the war against the Dominion would last a decade at best? The IoM has plenty of pros and cons that balance its capacity to strike outside of the IoM territories.
Um...not entirely true. In fact, if anything, Starfleet has shown to come up with quick advancement in technology during times of war. Early TNG era was incredibly stagnant in terms of Ambassador to Galaxy, but the moment the Borg and Dominion hit, they really started to advance.
Mm yes, but they won't have the time to put those changes into place at first. The ships they'll have to build, and crews to train, will be out of the "typical" mold, if only to gain efficiency and keep pace. New designs requires changing many things. It's possible but I don't see this coming as the priority.
As for time travel, I never understood why stars were so important. I liked Voyage Home, it was a nice movie with the whale probe and all that, very weird (just like TMP, special in its own way - actually Trek is at its finest when it does the big dumb obscure object).
That said, would they be allowed to travel back to time to give the UFP higher technology? If, from a certain point of view, it was allowed to travel back to time to pick some whales and put them in the ocean in order to save Earth, why wouldn't this be allowed here?
No super temporal power seemed to poke its head either when Nero wrecked havoc.
No one stopped the Borg either.
Oh, on the topic of First Contact, didn't the Enterprise fly through the temporal rift? Didn't they just reopen the one created by the sphere?