sonofccn wrote:Hmm yes. Vivftp calcs do appear to be an even handed and fair calc of the incident, through when using the RISE torp as a benchmark he uses it as soon as it exited the craft ignoring the possibliity of glow growth which he remarked upon earlier, and generates a wide range of outcomes ranging from kiloton to low triple digit megaton. It in no way disproves high double digit megaton to low triple digit megaton.
I didn't say it did. I recognize Rise as one of the better showings.
We don't know. We cannot know how this lifeform reacts, nor how it musters the energies it uses to pull down shuttles from space and block beaming technology as mounted onboard capital ships. 
While we can't know for sure we have no reason to assume his psychic powers would enhance an explosion.
If you see Armus as an engine of some sort, that can do certain things in exchange of certain power, and that at the moment he was fired at, he was pissed off and not wanting to be alone and possibly in full rage and trying to prevent anyone from leaving, he could be totally charged up, psychic powers or not.
Indeed, and I originally mentionned it a while back in my exchange with JMS. 
Possible but we can't know how much if any was added.
It's extremely unlikely that the pods, which didn't leak AM obviously, would have added nothing to the explosion. Since we're talking about a shuttle capable of crossing systems and carrying a highly ranked delegate, we're certainly not looking at a piss poor sluggish shuttle either, which means a good warp speed, thus a certain high consumption of energy, and the adequate fuel reserves for this.
What's arbitrary here exactly? 
We're talking about cases which have to fit and above all make sense. It's not a question of looking attractive, it's a question of understanding the implication of what an episode claims. It's absurd to insist on high ends like the blue ball on repulsors that leaves a continent wide crater in Obsession in a way that makes zero scientific sense for what is nothing more than a major antimatter explosion, or in another episode, the Nil that can withstand sound waves in space that would be so powerful they could vapourize countless planets in a fraction of a second but don't even harm the atmosphere of the planet they were fired from. These are the illogical outliers. 
And to those who'd pretend it's only a TOS thing, and thus any post TOS über high ends are logical, please think of Voyager which had a shuttle's overloading warp core being a lethal threat to a fully operational Voyager at a distance of a million kilometers, with the ship's crew fully aware of the impeding danger and thus ready to switch shields on. 
Well first off you started this based upon me citing Balance of Terror which falls under high Trek not Insane firepower as planet destroying sound waves( in space no less). So I believe this entire thing is a strawman argument unless your point is to dismiss TOS, and as extension any firepower event too high.
I'm just weary of TOS based arguments. It brings me to a position which you lot won't like, but that's the way it goes, because it has me only accept what fits with the newer Trek, which in general seems less far fetched in the power of regular equipment and other devices.
The yield cited in Doomsday Machine makes far more sense for example.
But please define what you meant by "super weapon of that time". Do you mean something that can bust a mile long asteroid in one or two shots was deemed a rare and extremely overkill Romulan weapon back then?
Second citing them as nonsense because they violate real physics is a cheap shot at best. From gravity plating to warp drive to phasers they abuse and break the laws as we know them. Obsession is no less valid then Star Trek V in terms of firepower or any of the multitude of other examples runing the gambit of fire power.
It is, but it's only obvious from the moment you think about it for a moment. It was nothing more than an antimatter bomb on steroids. Have you considered the energies needed to remove the atmosphere of a planet in one shot, from a single bomb?
You'd better try to pulverize the planet. There's just no way this bomb could have done what it supposedly did, and the explosion cooled off so fast that it was nothing more than a giant scorch mark effect flattened on the surface of the planet.
If that wasn't bad enough, they supposedly filled that container on repulsors with teraton-worthy ounces of antimatter picked from the standard fuel reserves routinely used in the warp core!
Plu-eez.
I'm not ignoring it. You'll also notice that turning a planet into a cinder is a separate concern. The abilities I explicited, once zeroed on the Link, would be the equivalent of focusing all that firepower into one spot. Plus again hyperbole.
Ah no. 
Garak wrote:I was hoping to gain control of 
			the phasers as well. I just 
			hadn't gotten around to it yet.
				(a beat)
			Don't you see? We have an 
			opportunity here. A chance to end 
			the Dominion threat once and for all.
				(trying to win him over)
			We have enough firepower on this 
			ship to turn that planet into a 
			smoking cinder. Personally, I 
			think that would be a very good 
			thing.
 The cinder bit is not some idle comentary on Defiant class ability. Garak is trying to pursuad Worf to wipe out the Link, which we have no idea how far it covers it's planet but has always been protrayed as large, cutting off the serpents head before being destroyed by the guarding warships. He isn't musing that with a couple of torps he can throw the world into nuclear winter but that they have the firepower to kill a race that  are canoncialy established as taking several disrupter shots or a high powered phaser blast to kill on an individual basis. Who can transform into things like mist or just about anything else to try and escape death and as an extension it is logical to assume they are very bloody hard to kill.
A teutology is not a good argument. He's merely saying the ship can do X, and thus this is enough firepower to destroy the Great Link. 
You want to argue that the ship has enough firepower to slag the whole planet, which would require a firepower that's not seen anywhere else.
Taking Wong's nuclear calculator, assuming fireball causes and behaviour would be fairly similar, and taking a 100 MT device, we get a ground contact fireball radius of 4.4 km, thus an area of 60.82 km².
The Founders' planet doesn't seem to have that much watery areas, so it's mostly dry. Earth has a surface area of 510,072,000 km².
You'd need 8,386,583 torpedoes to blanket the whole planet with fire, and roughly 27,313 torps if you deemed "3rd degree burns" thermal radiation good enough to kill Founders.
I'm giving you an opportunity to accept a good enough firepower capability without dismissing it entirely by tagging it of being pure hyperbole.