Well, I don't think the E-1701, the BoPs, nor the weapons are sublight since dialog clearly stated the E-1701 was heading across the NZ at warp 5. One thing the TOS remastered keeps is the lack of doppler shifting "star streaks" when ships are seen at warp.2046 wrote:A few notes:
1. Especially in the remastered version, the Romulan BoP weapons of "The Deadly Years" are not FTL.
I'd almost forgotten about that example. It makes me really wonder what the real difference is between phasers and disruptors. Consider:2. Green phaser beam: http://www.phasers.net/2260/p2-wi09.jpg
- Both phasers and disruptors can be fired as bolts. Disruptors far more often are seen used in this mode.
- Both phasers and disruptors beams can be green colored.
- Both phasers and disruptors can be fired as continuous beams.
- Both phasers and disruptors on high settings can "vaporize" a humanoid without noticeable DET thermal effects.
So, like, what's the difference?
2046 wrote:3. It would make little sense for the "Image in the Sand" weapons to be strictly a planetary assault weapon. Were they strictly planetary assault weapons, and hence unusable for hospital defense, then that fact would've been very noteworthy in the exchanges that occurred between Bajoran, Federation, and Romulan personnel.
Well, Ross was quite stupidly trying not to do anything that would upset the alliance, so I'am not sure that's a good enough reason. Certainly the weapons can be used against ships that don't maneuver at sublight or low warp speeds (or at least don't maneuver very much anyway). They just aren't as versatile as phasers and photon torpedoes.
All true. But again, Ross really didn't raise any serious objections for fear of risking the alliance. However it is clear, so far as we can tell, that the Romulan weapon of BoT, and possibly the plasma weapon of the TNG-era aren't much good against a ship capable of high warp speed and maneuvering.2046 wrote:While it's true that Kira dismissed the concept of their presence for defensive purposes, this was not because of any statement that the weapon design was strictly for planetary attack. The issue was that they were on Bajor's fourth moon, and hence within bombardment range of Bajor, thereby constituting a "direct threat".
-Mike