2046 wrote:Jedi Master Spock wrote:Further, this is of immense easily applicable use. If the E-D can draw thousands of exawatts from subspace using its warp coils, that in and of itself is easily turned into a power generator of massive capabilities. A perpetual motion machine, in fact. Phased matter seems to be mostly transformed and transitioned; there's no real usable energy production that we can be sure of. Same thing with antigrav. Having free antigrav that doesn't obey CoE means you can generate loads of free power. Given the portability of antigrav tech, in fact, you can make very small perpetual motion machines.
I see where you're going, but I just don't agree. Mass lightening is canon, and perpetual motion is not (save for Nomad's report of himself). Ergo, we must be missing data or otherwise are ignorant of something.
I would equate it to magnets . . . on their face, you would think that a device requiring no power yet doing work would be a quick ticket to perpetual motion, but it just isn't so. I think mass-lightening tech has similar issues.
Maybe I'm just having trouble accepting the high numbers you're coming up with, but it just seems as if something is wrong. Being a slow and ponderous thinker, I'll have to consider the matter further before reporting what that is.
Well, if it's the highest numbers, the very highest numbers are anything but certain. The individual estimates regarding the "Deja Q" case, for example, could easily be substantially off; we're not so sure on the precise size, position, and mass of Bre'el, Bre'el IV, and its wayward moon. It's a guess, but not a very precise one.
Then, there's also the energy stored in the gravitational field of the moon itself (not just the moon having a different binding energy relative to other objects in the system), which you might guesstimate
classically at several exajoules - small, but potentially significant in the larger scheme of things as a correction factor.
The highest numbers of all - "Operation:Annihilate!" are spectacularly unreliable IMO, and it's worth keeping in mind that the power noted is only supplied for a very brief
flash.
There are a lot of dodges we can make - but whenever we can find a possible or actual combination of final and initial states without any warp fields present, we can estimate the net work done. Since the E-D can drop out of warp on a dime basically at will ("Relics") we can insert a possible final state involving a warp-field free object wherever it (or the moon, or whatever) move to. However we dice it, though, the 12.75 exawatt dialog reference is probably at least an order of magnitude below
peak performance, even if it is quite enough to drive the ship at normal warp speeds.
We might also ask how much ready energy the warp nacelles and EPS system might store from the warp core. It's quite possible that peak power
consumption from the warp power system exceeds the sustainable peak power
generation of the warp core, seeing as in all these cases, the real
peak power requirements - warping upstream in a
g field, applying a warp field - usually are short-term.
You may remember your "Homer Simpsons per second"
concern; I have
calculated, however, that Voyager, to gauge by warp core pressures and temperatures, should have no difficulty pumping plasma in fast enough to hit... oh... 76 exawatts, give or take.