What is it not? It's up to you to prove that there's something wrong in its scales.Lucky wrote:What evidence is there the scene was to scale. I can easily find scenes where things are farther then they appear to be in DS9. It's a notable problem DS9 had.
1. I considered them to be big windows. Star Trek seems to dig them.What evidence is there that those windows are the size you think they are, or that they are even windows?
2. I don't see much other use to white rectangles on the external side of a building.
3. We also have the ships flying under the shield, which is erected very close to the surface of the asteroid, so when a ship dumps its payload after approaching the base, we can assume it must be close to the asteroid. Which gives an idea of the asteroid's size.
They did get the big boom in the end. It's just that the unplanned part occurred before they'd even think about reacting. In fact, the only person who would know that something is not exactly as violent as planned is the sensor guy, and not only by the time he may have taken a decision, the whole asteroid did blow up, but he may have had something else in mind, knowing that he was going to die.The problem is the characters do nothing to support this theory. They never do or say anything to show that the explosion was anything other then the insanely large boom they planned on.Mr. Oragahn wrote: If I remember correctly, the plan did go on as smoothly as initially planned.
I rationalized the difference between what was expected and what happened with the idea that it was a worst case scenario, and that we have to understand that Sisko considered to strong possibility of a chain reaction going on.
So we can scrap it.The problem is that reaching relativistic speeds is repeatedly shown to be easy for the Federation.Mr. Oragahn wrote: It's a problem if they had the possibility to go FTL or at least use warp at STL to quickly reach high percentages of c, but then I'm not the one who wrote that episode.
Perhaps activating such systems is considered unsafe when flying close to explosive things.
The Phoenix(first contact) was able to easily reach 20,000 km/s before going to warp.
People joke about how they're not suppose to go 70% the speed of light in Titan's atmosphere like they were talking worrying about getting a speeding ticket(Chain of Command).
It seems like Deep Space nine with only the six thrusters might have been able to get far enough from the blast with ease(Emissary)
The scene as shown doesn't make sense.
Warpcores, not antimatter. Who knows, it may just be an after effect of the containment. Perhaps they produce a vacuum. Perhaps that in order to get the best reaction possible between matter and antimatter, they generate massive forces that converge, and that if there's a misalignment at some point, it will pretty much look like an implosion. Only to expand normally just after that.Warpcores are stated to commonly implode,...Mr. Oragahn wrote: Antimatter is, most of the time, shown to have normal explosion yields. Be it from torps or capital ships having their cores blow up.
Well, at least as far as I've read on Internet.
They are.... and are just strange to the point that they may not actually be matt/anti-matter reactors.
And I doubt that very strongly.Some quotes point to the Dilithium actually being the power source somehow. After researching the topic, I'm doubting that anything that would come out of a warpcore would be normal matter/anti-matter.