- Only one fully functional Death Star was ever completed by the Empire.
- Scaling of this object varies. It is universally accepted to be between 60 and 350 kilometers in diameter, and most commonly scaled to 120 or 160 km.
- The Death Star has a maximum sublight acceleration less than or equal to 10 g.
- The Death Star uses a superlaser, which induces an explosive chain reaction in a target planet, blowing it up energetically.
- The Death Star has a large magnetic shield, through which shielded objects with thrusters may be flown.
- The Death Star's hull is not protected by any other shields.
- The Death Star has a host of small manually operated defense turrets with limited accuracy (see later point).
- The Death Star may rotate with an angular acceleration between 30-300 microradians per second squared.
- The Death Star can travel through hyperspace.
- From assembled spaceframe to completion was twenty years. Construction of the spaceframe is unknown, but the design had been mostly finalized two years previusly.
- It has long range tractor beams (range on the order of hundreds of km).
- Attacked by thirty one enemy small craft, Death Star defenses were able to down 27, or 87%. Most of these kills were achieved by TIE fighters.
- A critical weakness allowed a reactor overload.
- This reactor overload was orders of magnitude less energetic than a superlaser hit on a planet.
- Descriptions within the EU vary wildly.
Summary of the Death Star
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:26 pm
- Contact:
Summary of the Death Star
What is known?
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:15 am
60km figure does not come from scaling but from a early blueprints. No scaling points to a size lesser than 120km.Jedi Master Spock wrote:Scaling of this object varies. It is universally accepted to be between 60 and 350 kilometers in diameter, and most commonly scaled to 120 or 160 km.
You provided no evidence for a chain reaction.Jedi Master Spock wrote:The Death Star uses a superlaser, which induces an explosive chain reaction in a target planet, blowing it up energetically.
Limited against small starfighters.Jedi Master Spock wrote:The Death Star has a host of small manually operated defense turrets with limited accuracy (see later point).
Incomplete Death Star 2 could do so. Incomplete vessels are not a reliable benchmark for capabilities of completed ships.Jedi Master Spock wrote:The Death Star may rotate with an angular acceleration between 30-300 microradians per second squared.
Specify.Jedi Master Spock wrote:Descriptions within the EU vary wildly.
- Mr. Oragahn
- Admiral
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Paradise Mountain
It's called Death Star, a recent EU book. It has most bizarre effects and, among other things, even mentions a chain reaction going on.Kane Starkiller wrote: You provided no evidence for a chain reaction.
Considering that you're obviously showing problems to follow the discussion in the appropriate thread, I take you by the hand and show you the link:
Here
Drag the cursor over the word "here" and click with the left mouse button. See you there.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:26 pm
- Contact:
Actually, some scaling techniques applied to the DS2 produce small sizes, which indicate then a <120km DS1, but yes, the 60 km figure comes from blueprints.Kane Starkiller wrote:60km figure does not come from scaling but from a early blueprints. No scaling points to a size lesser than 120km.
>160km for the Death Star is similarly rare.
I have, as have others. Mr. Oragahn has pointed this out in his post above.You provided no evidence for a chain reaction.
And also against the Falcon.Limited against small starfighters.
Limited accuracy it is, by all indications.
The incomplete Death Star 2 doing so is the only reason why we might choose to allow an entire order of magnitude of leeway from the actual observed rotation speed of the Death Star.Incomplete Death Star 2 could do so. Incomplete vessels are not a reliable benchmark for capabilities of completed ships.
The above was a summary, not a comprehensive catalog.Specify.
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:15 am
No you haven't. You claimed repeatedly that certain explosion artifacts point to a chain reaction without explaining how or why.Jedi Master Spock wrote:I have, as have others. Mr. Oragahn has pointed this out in his post above.
Which isn't much bigger than a starship and certainly smaller and more maneuverable than any capital ship.Jedi Master Spock wrote:And also against the Falcon.
Limited accuracy it is, by all indications.
I still await evidence for the DS2 engine completion stage. I also note the contradiction in your original post in which you state that only one fully functional Death Star was built but then continue to use the second as benchmark.Jedi Master Spock wrote:The incomplete Death Star 2 doing so is the only reason why we might choose to allow an entire order of magnitude of leeway from the actual observed rotation speed of the Death Star.
It provided no information whatsoever since we don't know what you mean by "wildly".Jedi Master Spock wrote:The above was a summary, not a comprehensive catalog.
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:03 pm
You know, you can't ignore parts of the EU because they don't say what you want.Kane Starkiller wrote:No you haven't. You claimed repeatedly that certain explosion artifacts point to a chain reaction without explaining how or why.Jedi Master Spock wrote:I have, as have others. Mr. Oragahn has pointed this out in his post above.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:26 pm
- Contact:
Actually, I've concentrated more on the how and the why. Others prefer the explosion VFX, but I prefer to take VFX with a grain of salt.Kane Starkiller wrote:No you haven't. You claimed repeatedly that certain explosion artifacts point to a chain reaction without explaining how or why.
And? Still a fact worth noting. It's substantially larger than a fighter.Which isn't much bigger than a starship and certainly smaller and more maneuverable than any capital ship.
As I have explained, the quicker spin of the incomplete DS2 is the only thing that leads us to a possibly higher angular acceleration, and so it is worth taking into account as a possibility.I still await evidence for the DS2 engine completion stage. I also note the contradiction in your original post in which you state that only one fully functional Death Star was built but then continue to use the second as benchmark.
Well, take it as you will. As for myself, the varied treatments are worth noting.It provided no information whatsoever since we don't know what you mean by "wildly".
-
- Padawan
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:36 pm
- Location: Behind you. Boo!
The funniest part of the Death star is, with 20 YEARS to construct it, no Empire Engineer looked at the plans and said "You know, this thermal exhaust shaft goes straight from the surface to the reactor...I think we should put a couple of turns in it, in case someone shoots something up the tailpipe."
- Praeothmin
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 3920
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
- Location: Quebec City
considering it took a kid with Force powers to succeed in hitting that bullseye, and that "experienced" pilots thought it was impossible to do, I don't think that was much of an oversight...The Elder Dwoof wrote:The funniest part of the Death star is, with 20 YEARS to construct it, no Empire Engineer looked at the plans and said "You know, this thermal exhaust shaft goes straight from the surface to the reactor...I think we should put a couple of turns in it, in case someone shoots something up the tailpipe."
-
- Padawan
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:36 pm
- Location: Behind you. Boo!
But they went to the trouble to ray-shield the shaft...so clearly that possibility had occurred to them.Praeothmin wrote:considering it took a kid with Force powers to succeed in hitting that bullseye, and that "experienced" pilots thought it was impossible to do, I don't think that was much of an oversight...The Elder Dwoof wrote:The funniest part of the Death star is, with 20 YEARS to construct it, no Empire Engineer looked at the plans and said "You know, this thermal exhaust shaft goes straight from the surface to the reactor...I think we should put a couple of turns in it, in case someone shoots something up the tailpipe."
- Praeothmin
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 3920
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
- Location: Quebec City
-
- Padawan
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:36 pm
- Location: Behind you. Boo!
Ah Yes, the old "Good guys/Bad guys accuracy" conundrum, where the easier the shot is, the more likely a villain is to miss, and the harder the shot is, the more likely the hero to hit...so 100 stormtroopers, all firing blaster bolts on full auto at a single hero, standing still in the middle of a room will always miss, while a single hero, hanging upside down by one leg and swinging, pendulum-like from an overhead pipe will always hit.Praeothmin wrote:Perhaps, or perhaps it was to protect it against a Tie fighter's stray shot (the pilots are about as accurate as Stormtroopers)...
:-)
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:03 pm
On the other hand a non-force powered dude came ridiculously close to hitting it on his first try. Sound to me the "experienced" pilot was not so right after all.Praeothmin wrote:considering it took a kid with Force powers to succeed in hitting that bullseye, and that "experienced" pilots thought it was impossible to do, I don't think that was much of an oversight...The Elder Dwoof wrote:The funniest part of the Death star is, with 20 YEARS to construct it, no Empire Engineer looked at the plans and said "You know, this thermal exhaust shaft goes straight from the surface to the reactor...I think we should put a couple of turns in it, in case someone shoots something up the tailpipe."
- Praeothmin
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 3920
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
- Location: Quebec City
Really?Roondar wrote:On the other hand a non-force powered dude came ridiculously close to hitting it on his first try. Sound to me the "experienced" pilot was not so right after all.
That pilot had his targetting computer locking on to that pipe, with not doing any evasive maneuvers but flying his craft in s straight line to maximize his efficiency, that pilot "came close", but he didn't succeed.
It took a kid, under fire, flying without the assistance of his badly damaged astromech droid, without his targetting computer but strong in the Force, to succeed...
;-)
-
- Security Officer
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm
Red Leader was under fire, not unlike what Luke would go through. Both of them had two wingmen, who for a short time, distracted and got in the way of the pursuing TIEs. The problem is that the Y-wings which made the first run didn't even get to fire any of their proton torpedoes before being shot down. So we have no idea whether or not Gold Leader and his wing would have been able to pull it off. Luke also lucked out incredibly by having Han and Chewie show up in the Falcon just in the nick of time to save his butt, thus clearing the way for him to make a clean shot, Force or not at the target shaft opening.
-Mike
-Mike