About me supposedly ignoring evidence
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
About me supposedly ignoring evidence
If there are any major, massive pieces of evidence that you want me to respond to, please post them here.
Or to other people in general.
That is, sometimes I miss these pieces of evidence because they're spread over the board, and many topics include several long, hour-to-respond-to type posts that largely repeat the same thing, directed at me.
Or to other people in general.
That is, sometimes I miss these pieces of evidence because they're spread over the board, and many topics include several long, hour-to-respond-to type posts that largely repeat the same thing, directed at me.
- Mr. Oragahn
- Admiral
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Paradise Mountain
Re: About me supposedly ignoring evidence
Oh shut up.StarWarsStarTrek wrote:If there are any major, massive pieces of evidence that you want me to respond to, please post them here.
Or to other people in general.
That is, sometimes I miss these pieces of evidence because they're spread over the board, and many topics include several long, hour-to-respond-to type posts that largely repeat the same thing, directed at me.
You're fooling yourself. You think anyone is going to repeat once again all previous elements in another thread just because you can't be bothered to read them to begin with?
There is no reason to succumb to your absurd demand. If there is anything that needs to be addressed, it will be in the right threads, where things have to be dealt with.
For instance, don't expect people to bring here all the BDZ related evidence you ignored times and times again in many threads you derailed and then in the very BDZ thread itself!
Same goes with anything about the Death Star's power generation, or TDiC, etc.
There's no point indulging your absurd request. You don't even deserve anything of that value because you have refused on and on to pay attention to evidence in the very threads you were posting. Why should we believe you'll do here what you haven't done in the appropriate places?
This latest thread of yours is silly and I wouldn't be surprised if it would get closed. It's just a weak bait.
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: About me supposedly ignoring evidence
Like the others, you accuse me of topic evasion, yet when I ask for proof, you fail to deliver. You are yet another example of somebody that makes irrational accusations and fails to back them up.
Bait thread? If I were trying to evade responding to evidence, why would I bait people into showing me said evidence when I supposedly wish to avoid it? See the ridiculous circular logic holes in your rationales?
Bait thread? If I were trying to evade responding to evidence, why would I bait people into showing me said evidence when I supposedly wish to avoid it? See the ridiculous circular logic holes in your rationales?
-
- Padawan
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: About me supposedly ignoring evidence
Obviously so you can deny it by doing it again.StarWarsStarTrek wrote:Like the others, you accuse me of topic evasion, yet when I ask for proof, you fail to deliver. You are yet another example of somebody that makes irrational accusations and fails to back them up.
Bait thread? If I were trying to evade responding to evidence, why would I bait people into showing me said evidence when I supposedly wish to avoid it?
Ridiculous like a wild goose.See the ridiculous circular logic holes in your rationales?
Silly like one too, if you think anyone will be fooled into chasing you a second time.
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: About me supposedly ignoring evidence
You just joined. My suspicion is growing.
- Praeothmin
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 3920
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
- Location: Quebec City
Re: About me supposedly ignoring evidence
Hello there , ObiKatana!
Before you go off accusing someone of something, you should of course familiarize yourself with that person's posting history...
Unless you will tell us you've successfully read ALL of SWST's posts in the few days you've been here?
Before you go off accusing someone of something, you should of course familiarize yourself with that person's posting history...
Unless you will tell us you've successfully read ALL of SWST's posts in the few days you've been here?
- Mr. Oragahn
- Admiral
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Paradise Mountain
Re: About me supposedly ignoring evidence
I have more than ample evidence to back anything I say. Drop the lies.StarWarsStarTrek wrote:Like the others, you accuse me of topic evasion, yet when I ask for proof, you fail to deliver. You are yet another example of somebody that makes irrational accusations and fails to back them up.
As usual, you claim innocence. Yet, when it came to the Death Star, for example, you were told that evidence was relative to the method of destruction of Despayre, that the power production figure you used didn't fit with the observed effects of a shot at 1/3 of max power. You didn't even try to refute it. You simply ignored everything about it, both the book's material and observations and claims.
Because evidence was presented, and you acted like none existed. So there is no point giving you the benefit of doubt once again, again countless offtopic runs.Bait thread? If I were trying to evade responding to evidence, why would I bait people into showing me said evidence when I supposedly wish to avoid it? See the ridiculous circular logic holes in your rationales?
You just don't deserve it. And no, I'm not seeing where you're getting any better. If anything, you're just getting more and more obtuse.
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: About me supposedly ignoring evidence
Nowhere did I claim that no evidence was provided. I actively admit in the OP that here may be evidence that I missed, and that you can post them here.
Despite having a clear forum to post all of your evidence that you want me to answer, and refuse to post any despite having little to lose from it and everything to prove; if I ignore what you post HERE, I cannot claim not noticing it.
Actively and aggressively refusing to repost evidence you posted earlier when all you have to do is to search for them and paste them, and instead making a drawn excuse to not do so, even though the excuse takes more energy and space than just pasting your arguments once more, is a red flag.
See the hypocrisy? You want me to answer your rebuttals, I ask you to post it, and you refuse, telling me to go find it.
I'm calling you out: You're bullshitting.
Despite having a clear forum to post all of your evidence that you want me to answer, and refuse to post any despite having little to lose from it and everything to prove; if I ignore what you post HERE, I cannot claim not noticing it.
Actively and aggressively refusing to repost evidence you posted earlier when all you have to do is to search for them and paste them, and instead making a drawn excuse to not do so, even though the excuse takes more energy and space than just pasting your arguments once more, is a red flag.
See the hypocrisy? You want me to answer your rebuttals, I ask you to post it, and you refuse, telling me to go find it.
I'm calling you out: You're bullshitting.
-
- Security Officer
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm
Re: About me supposedly ignoring evidence
Mr. Oragahn has summed up quite well why this is a pointless thread. If you need a reminder, just go back to when you first came here and review the "A challenge to Trekkies" thread where you ignored 90 percent of what was given to you as evidence and arguements. At that time it was perfectly understandable that a newcomer would be overwhelmed as you claimed, but since then, as Mr. O has correctly pointed out you have shown a repeated history of making threads, then when people respond, you ignore their often quite extensive evidence in favor your own suppostition or one small piece of evidence. I would also remind you of this piece here where you provided a fan-made piece of artwork as evidence, and then got upset when people called you out on it along with the YouTube fan video that cut and pasted several different sci-fi shows along with bits from DS9 to make a story.
-Mike
-Mike
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: About me supposedly ignoring evidence
Do you understand how much of the various posts in "challenge to trekkies" were long repeats of the posts before them? Perhaps a few contained something new that I forgot to refute, which is why I made this thread. There would be no motive for me to create this thread if I were intentionally ignoring evidence.Mike DiCenso wrote:Mr. Oragahn has summed up quite well why this is a pointless thread. If you need a reminder, just go back to when you first came here and review the "A challenge to Trekkies" thread where you ignored 90 percent of what was given to you as evidence and arguements. At that time it was perfectly understandable that a newcomer would be overwhelmed as you claimed, but since then, as Mr. O has correctly pointed out you have shown a repeated history of making threads, then when people respond, you ignore their often quite extensive evidence in favor your own suppostition or one small piece of evidence. I would also remind you of this piece here where you provided a fan-made piece of artwork as evidence, and then got upset when people called you out on it along with the YouTube fan video that cut and pasted several different sci-fi shows along with bits from DS9 to make a story.
-Mike
So, Mike, and anybody else with an important argument, all you have to do is to spend maybe thirty seconds finding your argument and copying/pasting it to this thread. If I ignore it, then I have no excuse anymore, do I?
-
- Security Officer
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm
Re: About me supposedly ignoring evidence
Actually, I just did. You have never properly addressed the evidence and arguements in the "A Challenge to Trekkies" thread, so why would dredging up literally hundreds of posts do any good now? Go through that thread and pick almost anything that anyone is saying and it would be just as good. That's why no one is doing it because you've burned people many times before, why should we expect you won't be any different now?
-Mike
-Mike
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: About me supposedly ignoring evidence
Mike, there are 211 posts in that thread. Which ones contain pressing arguments that I have not refuted? Please be more specific than "look over 211 posts!"
- Praeothmin
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 3920
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
- Location: Quebec City
Re: About me supposedly ignoring evidence
Well, you could read the latest non-Breetai replies and make sure all these arguments are responded to...
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: About me supposedly ignoring evidence
Start here if you like:
http://www.starfleetjedi.net/forum/view ... 9&start=45
You ignore the fact that they were stuck with auxiluary power BEFORE they entered the sphere let alone got near the star.
You claimed that they were using auxiluary shields that have never even been mentioned or seen in any trek episode or movie EVER let alone that episode.
You ignore that they are in orbit of the star for a considerable amount of time at 150,000km with SHIELDS DOWN, before needing to raise them due to a matter eplosion from the star they fly through.
You ignore the fact the explosions are going to gain in power and that the raised shields are only initially at 23% due to earlier damage but will still last for hours.
Simply put the bullshit you preached from SDN was torn apart so you made up even bigger bullshit and when that got ripped to shreds you bailed on the thread as per usual.
/awaits new bullshit from SWST.
http://www.starfleetjedi.net/forum/view ... 9&start=45
You ignore the fact that they were stuck with auxiluary power BEFORE they entered the sphere let alone got near the star.
You claimed that they were using auxiluary shields that have never even been mentioned or seen in any trek episode or movie EVER let alone that episode.
You ignore that they are in orbit of the star for a considerable amount of time at 150,000km with SHIELDS DOWN, before needing to raise them due to a matter eplosion from the star they fly through.
You ignore the fact the explosions are going to gain in power and that the raised shields are only initially at 23% due to earlier damage but will still last for hours.
Simply put the bullshit you preached from SDN was torn apart so you made up even bigger bullshit and when that got ripped to shreds you bailed on the thread as per usual.
/awaits new bullshit from SWST.
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1813
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: About me supposedly ignoring evidence
he just responded to my thread and ignored about..all of the OP conditions we can go ahead and add that to the list of stuff he dodges runs from or ignoresPraeothmin wrote:Well, you could read the latest non-Breetai replies and make sure all these arguments are responded to...