I already said it: If you simply say "let's not use ICS for debate" that is perfectly fine by me.Nonamer wrote:Says who? There is no canon policy on this board. You are free to believe what you will regarding canon. I do not need to justify my position.
But if you say "ICS is wrong" then I expect you to back up that claim and provide evidence.
"Saxtonites!" Man this would be funny if it weren't so sad. ICS is an official book approved by George Lucas. It doesn't have to "prove" anything. It statements are considered true unless proved otherwise. Do you have any proof that turbolaser bolts are not tracers and that invisible beam is fired just as the turbolaser bolt hits the target? No? Didn't think so.Mike DiCenso wrote:Case in point: Kane Starkiller.
"Prove that lightspeed TLs don't exist!" he cries!
Ah, that's is one of the oldest fallacies in the book. It's up to the Saxtonites/ICSers to prove that light speed TLs exist, which it doesn't as anyone looking at the asteroid destruction scene in TESB could tell you, even with the FX gaffee of an asteroid starting to be destroyed a few frames in advance of the TL bolt that is supposed to be destroying it.
Of course as I already said if you wish to disregard the ICS that is fine by me but if you wish to claim that ICS is wrong then I expect you to provide evidence.