ISD Mass - Wait, what just happened?
- 2046
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:14 pm
- Contact:
ISD Mass - Wait, what just happened?
So I was on Reddit and someone mentioned the mass of a Star Destroyer as 40,000,000 metric tons.
"Huh," I think, and go looking for the reference the guy linked to: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Imperial ... _Destroyer
The figure seems to have come from a new-canon Marvel comic book. So I look to see what I had for it exactly and, lo and behold, we have this line from a 2010 blog post, which happens to be the top entry for "star destroyer mass" on Google: "If one wants a specific estimate, I'd guess a density of 750kg/m³ and an ISD mass of 40,000,000 tonnes."
http://weblog.st-v-sw.net/2010/01/star- ... nsity.html
Now bear in mind, back when I started saying the thing massed in the double-digit millions of tonnes I was the low-baller. This 2009 Spacebattles thread suggests that few felt that way, with hundreds of millions and many (even hundreds of) billions being tossed casually: https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads ... er.148134/
Huh. Funny.
So am I now sorta-Disney-canon? And by the old ASVS rule of canon unless contradicted . . .
;-)
"Huh," I think, and go looking for the reference the guy linked to: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Imperial ... _Destroyer
The figure seems to have come from a new-canon Marvel comic book. So I look to see what I had for it exactly and, lo and behold, we have this line from a 2010 blog post, which happens to be the top entry for "star destroyer mass" on Google: "If one wants a specific estimate, I'd guess a density of 750kg/m³ and an ISD mass of 40,000,000 tonnes."
http://weblog.st-v-sw.net/2010/01/star- ... nsity.html
Now bear in mind, back when I started saying the thing massed in the double-digit millions of tonnes I was the low-baller. This 2009 Spacebattles thread suggests that few felt that way, with hundreds of millions and many (even hundreds of) billions being tossed casually: https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads ... er.148134/
Huh. Funny.
So am I now sorta-Disney-canon? And by the old ASVS rule of canon unless contradicted . . .
;-)
- 2046
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: ISD Mass - Wait, what just happened?
Spacebattles, Feb 2016 - "He's just guessing!"
https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads ... er.377256/
Spacebattles, Nov 2016 - "The ICS is dumb!"
https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads ... er.464536/
Pardon my amusement.
https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads ... er.377256/
Spacebattles, Nov 2016 - "The ICS is dumb!"
https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads ... er.464536/
Pardon my amusement.
-
- Security Officer
- Posts: 5837
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm
Re: ISD Mass - Wait, what just happened?
I've noticed that a good number of people working on the shows and other material who've been turned off by the Saxonite and Warsie talifans have quietly been sneaking in material into the canon that could only have come from your website or perusal of other websites of a similar bent. It's either that or incredible coincidence.
-Mike
-Mike
- 2046
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: ISD Mass - Wait, what just happened?
Heh . . . found SDN folks talking about ship masses in 2003. Ender claimed "~1.3 trillion tons" for the Acclamator, which would put the ISD in the ten trillion range.
Edit: We have the winner: "Trillions. Maybe even Quadrillions or Quintillions of tons. Neutronium Armour isn't your friend.". That was 2005 at SDN.
Maximum amusement now obtained.
Edit: We have the winner: "Trillions. Maybe even Quadrillions or Quintillions of tons. Neutronium Armour isn't your friend.". That was 2005 at SDN.
Maximum amusement now obtained.
Last edited by 2046 on Wed Mar 29, 2017 12:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
- 2046
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: ISD Mass - Wait, what just happened?
I rather doubt it goes much further than mass and volumes in my case . . . I'm one of the few to publish on the topic outside of forums and such, making it easy to find. Indeed, I rather doubt there's even any concerted effort or 'sneaking'. There was a book where the authors lobbied hard for the 120km Death Star, for instance, countermanding Saxton . . . but that's probably because Saxton's figure was absurd. (Note: there is still no super-trench in Rogue One.)Mike DiCenso wrote:I've noticed that a good number of people working on the shows and other material who've been turned off by the Saxonite and Warsie talifans have quietly been sneaking in material into the canon that could only have come from your website or perusal of other websites of a similar bent. It's either that or incredible coincidence.
-Mike
Even if they pick a number from the air that sounds right, it'll probably land closer to those of a "fusion and steel" bent rather than a "tachyonic imaginary supermassive hypermatter" bent.
-
- Security Officer
- Posts: 5837
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm
Re: ISD Mass - Wait, what just happened?
Yeah, maybe, but it seems just a bit coincidental that the nerfing of SW firepower just happened to occur right about the time that the taifan attacks hit their peak... 2008, and has continued ever since then despite Wong and Wayne's "retirement". Also interesting I find is that Saxton has pretty much disappeared all together from the sci-fi tech scene and his website hasn't been updated in many, many years, which is surprising given the immense new body of tech information we've been given in the canon of TCW, Rebels, TFW, and more. But then again, that tech doesn't conform to his vision, so maybe that shouldn't come as much of a surprise.
I think it's testament to your well-thought work that someone would pick those numbers as a lot of your assumptions hold up in the absence of any other information provided in the canon. And I did find it funny that Connor MacLeod was actually defending your volumetrics and mass.
As for Rogue One, the Star Destroyers in formation next to the Death Star while the superlaser dish is being installed pretty much caps the size of the battlestation at or around 120 km, so someone must be really working hard to ensure a certain continuity is being maintained, at least where tech matters is concerned.
-Mike
I think it's testament to your well-thought work that someone would pick those numbers as a lot of your assumptions hold up in the absence of any other information provided in the canon. And I did find it funny that Connor MacLeod was actually defending your volumetrics and mass.
As for Rogue One, the Star Destroyers in formation next to the Death Star while the superlaser dish is being installed pretty much caps the size of the battlestation at or around 120 km, so someone must be really working hard to ensure a certain continuity is being maintained, at least where tech matters is concerned.
-Mike
- 2046
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: ISD Mass - Wait, what just happened?
I am actually confused on the Death Star, because I saw someone tweet that an ISD docks in the trench and, by eyeball, the scale matched mine, more or less… perhaps smaller. However, the R1 book supposedly says 160km again instead of 120.
I have a note that the Avenger type from TESB should have a dagger 200m tall, and by my eyeball that trench is about five daggers tall, or 1km. The trench as measured from my Falcon scaling came out to 1.2km, and that meant the Death Star would be 120km. So, either the trench in the new CG doesn't match the old model (doubtful), or the 160 number doesn't match the film (more likely), or the Devastator type has a much different dagger height (dunno yet).
I have a note that the Avenger type from TESB should have a dagger 200m tall, and by my eyeball that trench is about five daggers tall, or 1km. The trench as measured from my Falcon scaling came out to 1.2km, and that meant the Death Star would be 120km. So, either the trench in the new CG doesn't match the old model (doubtful), or the 160 number doesn't match the film (more likely), or the Devastator type has a much different dagger height (dunno yet).
-
- Security Officer
- Posts: 5837
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm
Re: ISD Mass - Wait, what just happened?
From what I know, the height from the keel to the domes on the conning tower superstructure for all ISD types is about 400 meters. So, taking the image above and going with that, the trench is at least twice the height of the ISD docking at the bay and thus the trench is no less than 800 meters and no higher than 1,000 meters.
I don't know what is in the R1 book, but the first Death Star is most definitely not 160 km in diameter, more like 96 to 120 km.
-Mike
I don't know what is in the R1 book, but the first Death Star is most definitely not 160 km in diameter, more like 96 to 120 km.
-Mike
Last edited by Mike DiCenso on Thu Mar 30, 2017 6:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- 2046
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: ISD Mass - Wait, what just happened?
We know from the image below (basically confirmed via other means as well at my site) that the Death Star height is about 94.3 times that of the trench. So, if the DS is supposed to be 160km, then the trench would've been a hair under 1.7km, meaning ISDs could've docked longitudinally upright instead of nose-down.
Say what you will, but that trench ain't 1.7km.
Say what you will, but that trench ain't 1.7km.
- Trinoya
- Security Officer
- Posts: 658
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:35 am
Re: ISD Mass - Wait, what just happened?
Huh... Well.. howboudah.
The mass figure has been one I've long disputed just from seeing some of these ships not collapse under their own weight when in atmosphere, I'm glad to hear the wankitude of it all has been significantly obliterated.
The mass figure has been one I've long disputed just from seeing some of these ships not collapse under their own weight when in atmosphere, I'm glad to hear the wankitude of it all has been significantly obliterated.
- 2046
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: ISD Mass - Wait, what just happened?
Howboudah indeed.
One other notable detail is that the 40,000,000 figure is old, from a time when I had a kess accurate ISD model to get the volume from. So, that figure is actually on the low end of my current 500-1000kg/m³ range of 34,767,000 to 69,534,000 tonnes. Asked today for a ballpark in the 750kg/m³ range and I'd have marked it as about fifty instead of forty.
At forty, the density of an ISD is a "mere" 600kg/m³ or so. Voyager's nearly twice as dense, and the Constitution Class almost seven times more dense.
One other notable detail is that the 40,000,000 figure is old, from a time when I had a kess accurate ISD model to get the volume from. So, that figure is actually on the low end of my current 500-1000kg/m³ range of 34,767,000 to 69,534,000 tonnes. Asked today for a ballpark in the 750kg/m³ range and I'd have marked it as about fifty instead of forty.
At forty, the density of an ISD is a "mere" 600kg/m³ or so. Voyager's nearly twice as dense, and the Constitution Class almost seven times more dense.
- 2046
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: ISD Mass - Wait, what just happened?
Based on 600kg/m^3, and with all class-specific caveats remaining as per my Starship Volumetrics page . . .
Code: Select all
Vessel/Class Length (m) Volume (m3) Mass (Tonnes)
Death Star I 120000 904,700,000,000,000 520,434,249,371,000
Death Star II 160000 2,144,000,000,000,000 1,233,349,210,403,000
SSD (Executor) 17600 12,645,900,000 7,274,632,000
Mon Cal Home One 3200 338,638,000 194,804,000
Trade Fed Droid Control 3170 2,027,750,000 1,166,476,000
Imperial SD 1609 69,534,240 40,000,000
Jedi Cruiser (Venator) 1137 15,838,619 9,111,000
Invisible Hand 1088 11,203,412 6,445,000
Separatist Munificent 825 2,238,022 1,287,000
Acclamator 752 8,140,243 4,683,000
Medical Frigate (Neb-B) 300 184,972 106,400
Republic Lt Cruiser 160 63,114 36,300
Galactic Cruiser (T-4) 150 64,752 37,200
Rebel Transport 120 23,942 13,800
Consular 115 19,220 11,060
Refugee Ship 110 60,722 34,930
Falcon 35 1,716 990
Twilight 34.1 4,604 2,650
AT-AT 22.5 615 350
Imperial Shuttle 19 477 270
X-Wing (flight) 12.5 27 15.5
TIE Fighter 6 7.8 4.4
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: ISD Mass - Wait, what just happened?
That's funny and neat. My money is on the number having been pulled from your site directly or indirectly by the author and then passing the smell test by the editor. Probably indirectly, but still, it's neat.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: ISD Mass - Wait, what just happened?
Well, Saxton was a doctoral student when he did most of his SWTC stuff, and an early-career Ph. D. when he was involved with the ICS stuff (but even then was certainly not putting in nearly the time he did on the SWTC).Mike DiCenso wrote: ↑Wed Mar 29, 2017 1:56 amYeah, maybe, but it seems just a bit coincidental that the nerfing of SW firepower just happened to occur right about the time that the taifan attacks hit their peak... 2008, and has continued ever since then despite Wong and Wayne's "retirement". Also interesting I find is that Saxton has pretty much disappeared all together from the sci-fi tech scene and his website hasn't been updated in many, many years, which is surprising given the immense new body of tech information we've been given in the canon of TCW, Rebels, TFW, and more. But then again, that tech doesn't conform to his vision, so maybe that shouldn't come as much of a surprise.
He was already basically out of the analyzing-films side of the scene when I made this website, and personally, I'm not surprised that he disappeared and hasn't been updating his website.
I think he's made other things a priority. He got a doctorate to do astrophysics research; the Star Wars stuff was fun back when he was a doctoral student and he had some time, consulting with real Star Wars people was probably a real fun feather in his cap while it was going on, but either he decided to focus his time and attention on his research on his own, or he decided to do so after the Star Wars people decided not to keep hiring him for stuff like the ICS books. Being an early-career Ph. D. is very different from being a grad student, and I can see that he's been working on his research even if he hasn't been analyzing SW stuff. He has a fair number of papers out, including some that are recent.
And yeah, I think the LucasFilm people burned bridges with him after the "Talifan" stuff happened. I don't think it's a coincidence at all.
I kept a Starwars.com blog for a little while (and read around the Star Wars blogs), and I used to read Wookieepedia discussion pages a bit (although I avoided actually joining the arguments there), especially when I was working on our own wiki here... and the Saxtonites were pissing a lot of people off left and right within SW fandom. "Talifan" really crossed over the line, and that meant that the SW.com community volunteers, Wookieepedia community volunteers, and LucasFilm insiders all were angry at the same time at a group of fans visibly tied to Saxton.