Prove we initially see the DS as one of those dots.StarWarsStarTrek wrote:
Uh, no, the video clearly shows that the Death Star was within the viewscreen of the Falcon, but started off small and got larger. It wasn't scrolling up.
Oh and it was scrolling up.
"pretty darn high" being a unit of measurement equal to what in the real world of debating that requires a bit more than that?.I didn't claim that the velocity was the Death Star's. The Falcon likely did the moving, but that still shows that Star Wars ship speeds are pretty darn high.
So, we see the enterprise leave earth orbit with the earth on screen in the rear view and the velocity is easily 0.5c.Because it makes a 160 km battlestation go from being a speck to being a huge battlestation in a matter of seconds?
What same debunked crap? You mean the rebuttal attempt of disproving the indisputable; that is, the Death Star obviously moved towards Yavin 4, and that's a fact; by claiming it to be impossible?
Nope, your accusation that i was claiming it was impossible was the strawman you created to avoid the inertial dampening issue.
I did cover that in the last thread you tried to push this particular strawman but you ran away from that thread just like you have done all the others (3 in total now) and now in a forth thread started preaching your debunked crap......
Nope moving the DS at that velocity is quite doable but as we KNOW they have inertial dampening and mass lightening the power required to do so is not equal to the power you claim as your claim is done without them and as such is totaly flawed in many ways.Basically, trying to debunk soft sci fi on the concept of it not even being scientifically impossible, but practically impossible?
Strawmen are able to dismiss nothing.Do you not realize how skewed that is? I might as well dismiss warp drive because it's impossible.
I suggest you brush up on Newton's laws of motion, a brush up on inertial stresses could not hurt either.