sKor_Dahar_Master wrote:Maybe he is updating his site and is keeping it on the QT so he can make a big deal about it when he unviels it.
After all with the damage control he has do to regarding T canon ect its gonna takle a long while to create another house of cards.
Not really. The original SDN website articles (and Saxton's SWTC, and the entire body of Saxtonite fanalysis) were always about cherry-picking high ends and ignoring a large body of contradictory information. (Conversely, with Star Trek, cherry-picking low ends and ignoring a large body of contradictory evidence.)
The bigger the body of "canon" material is, the easier it is to find high-end examples to abuse. Treating the whole canon systematically becomes very difficult. It's the approach I try to take, but it would be impossible for any one individual to systematically examine the expanded universes of Star Wars or Star Trek. There's simply too much published under the label to systematically examine it all. At best, we can try for a broad sample of examples.
As Mr. Oragahn showed here, it's quite possible to pull a lot of information out of an old source that had previously been totally ignored by VS debaters. There are probably a hundred other similarly ignored sources lying around.