- no response
Argument and enforcement
- Who is like God arbour
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1155
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:00 pm
- Location: Germany
- Who is like God arbour
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1155
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:00 pm
- Location: Germany
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:25 am
- Location: Ponce, P.R
- Contact:
- Who is like God arbour
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1155
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:00 pm
- Location: Germany
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:25 am
- Location: Ponce, P.R
- Contact:
- Who is like God arbour
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1155
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:00 pm
- Location: Germany
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:25 am
- Location: Ponce, P.R
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:26 pm
- Contact:
Who is like God arbour, if you have no response you wish to give PunkMaister, then it simply suffices to say that once, or even more simply, to not reply to him at all. Repeatedly posting "no response" serves no constructive purpose. If it continues, I will lock the thread - something I am generally loathe to do.
- Who is like God arbour
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1155
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:00 pm
- Location: Germany
I have said it not only one or two times, I have said it three times.Jedi Master Spock wrote:Who is like God arbour, if you have no response you wish to give PunkMaister, then it simply suffices to say that once, or even more simply, to not reply to him at all. Repeatedly posting "no response" serves no constructive purpose.
But Punkmaister seemed not to have understood it because he still has expected me that I answer him.
Insofar I disagree.
It has had a constructive purpose to post "no response" repeatedly.
Now he has understood it - hopefully.
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:25 am
- Location: Ponce, P.R
- Contact:
Who is like God arbour wrote:I have said it not only one or two times, I have said it three times.Jedi Master Spock wrote:Who is like God arbour, if you have no response you wish to give PunkMaister, then it simply suffices to say that once, or even more simply, to not reply to him at all. Repeatedly posting "no response" serves no constructive purpose.
But Punkmaister seemed not to have understood it because he still has expected me that I answer him.
Insofar I disagree.
It has had a constructive purpose to post "no response" repeatedly.
Now he has understood it - hopefully.
Then this thread and it's reason of being is at an end. And just FYI when you posted "No response" the 3rd time was just out of spite because I had warned you already that it was SPAM and not to do it anymore which you did because you are just a jerk, a jerk that got righteously warned anr rightfully so. Now don't do it anymore and go away...
- Who is like God arbour
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1155
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:00 pm
- Location: Germany
I have also contacted Jedi Master Spock:
Narsil, if you have a few choice words for PunkMaister, feel free to say them.
Sonofccn, if you want to continue that debate, I'd be willing.
And everyone else, if you want to participate in that debate, you are welcome.
- Who is like God arbour wrote:Punkmaister has announced that he wants to complain about me and wants that you close a thread.
I'm more than willing to continue that debate with sonofcnn. But not with Punkmaister. Mr. Orgahan has also posted in that thread and may be interessted to continue his debate with Punkmaister.
Insofar there shouldn't be a reason to close the thread. It's not a debate solely between Punkmaister and me.
I think that my reasons to refuse to answer Punkmaister are made clear. He does not answer any questions and does not read what was written.
From my point of view, no interventions of you are necessary. But it's at you to decide what you will do.
Sincerely
WILGA
- I assume that's the reason why Jedi Master Spock, after reading my message, has changed his mind and, although he has had already announced his intention to close that thread, has in fact edited his post and has not closed this thread.
Narsil, if you have a few choice words for PunkMaister, feel free to say them.
Sonofccn, if you want to continue that debate, I'd be willing.
And everyone else, if you want to participate in that debate, you are welcome.
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:25 am
- Location: Ponce, P.R
- Contact:
No those are not the reasons this however are:.
http://www.starfleetjedi.net/forum/view ... 8005#18005
and here:
http://www.starfleetjedi.net/forum/view ... 8006#18006
Case closed...
BTW: And Jedi Master Spock never edited his post warning you either...
The reason it was not locked is because you ceased and desisted on SPAMMING but only after you got literally yanked by the ears by Jedi Master Spock because you continued despite my warning that I would report you as evidenced here:Jedi Master Spock wrote:I strongly considered locking it, but ultimately did not. Let me know if he continues posting "no response" repeatedly after having been warned.PunkMaister wrote:He is posting the same thing over and over like here: http://www.starfleetjedi.net/forum/view ... 8006#18006
So plz lock it...
http://www.starfleetjedi.net/forum/view ... 8005#18005
and here:
http://www.starfleetjedi.net/forum/view ... 8006#18006
Case closed...
BTW: And Jedi Master Spock never edited his post warning you either...
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:26 pm
- Contact:
I did indeed edit my post (several times, in fact) but very quickly, and before any replies were made to it. I considered locking the thread, and the very first version of my post said so; I did not lock the thread because the PunkMaister-Who is like God arbour vein was not the only part of discussion active, and - as I said - I am loathe to shut down threads unless absolutely necessary.
So, to encourage that thread to proceed to constructive discussion, I've split this portion of it, and locking it to discourage the continuation of less constructive discussion.
So, to encourage that thread to proceed to constructive discussion, I've split this portion of it, and locking it to discourage the continuation of less constructive discussion.