Cock_Knocker wrote:And again, you dismiss the silly notion that it took 12 HOURS for Han and the rebels to get to the control room without being discovered, that it took 12 MORE hours for the Imperials to run in to this "maze of tunnels" (And where is the proof of said maze, BTW? Quotes? Schematics? Anything?)and Han armed charges and ran out of the "maze" in a little less than 12 hours. On top of that, you side step the notion that the Rebels would blow the shield generator FOUR DAYS before the fleet gets there. Yeah, some surprise attack. Also, I noticed you threw in the "ridge" red herring. That no longer applies to what we're discussing once they're already AT the bunker. Try not to muddy up the discussion too much.
Novelization: "Apparently Wicket knows about a back door to this installation."
Also: Four Imperial scouts kept watch over the entrance to the bunker that emerged
far to the rear of the main section of the shield generator complex.
Film: THREEPIO He says there's a secret entrance on the
other side of the ridge.
The entrance they come in through - i.e., the famous bunker - is on the other side of the ridge in the distance, i.e., also on the opposite side of that ridge from the main complex, which they can see in front of the ridge, and far to the rear of the main section, which presumably includes the shield generator. If that ridge is closer than two klicks I'll be amazed.
And the tunnels? From the novelization, tunnel:
Furtively she led the way down the dark and low-beamed tunnel.
(Leia's in the lead, FYI.) And maze?
Han, Chewie, Leia, and a dozen Rebel commandos made their way through labyrinthine corridors toward the area where the shield generator was waiting on their map.
First of all, the Imperials coming to capture them already knew they were there, thanks to the Emperor. Secondly, you need to prove that Ewoks were somehow DAYS away. Proof? Quotes?
I don't, since as I've stated earlier, I favor a matter of hours. That it's a good hike from the Ewok village is established pretty well, especially since the Rebels show up on the far side from the entrance they actually knew.
IMO, there's no reason to assume the Imperials entering the bunker were doing anything more than blocking off an avenue of escape. There should have been a lot right near the command center.
Proof? Quotes? How did Han and co. get there in less than four days? They were on foot, too.
Strawman much? If someone is in good shape, they can walk a hundred klicks in a day.
However, short legged Ewoks are not going to make the hike to the far side of the Imperial shield generator complex in minutes. It's going to be at least on the order of hours, given short Ewok legs.
but your reasons for not liking multiple days have little to do with what I have argued for.
Which is proven to be incorrect, and unsubstantiated by anything in the movie, canon, or EU.
No, they really don't have much to do with it. I'm talking about a quarter to a half day, while you're arguing against five days. Arguments aimed an order of magnitude off simply don't translate very well.
That still doesn't equate to five days of travel time between Sullust to Endor.
Take that argument up with 2046. I'm not advancing five days.
The video isn't canon
Nor does it reflect the canon in its treament of the evidence. Not as you measure it. There's something to be said for the internal consistency of an argument.
And you are still side-stepping the most important question that scene brings up: Why launch fighters if it takes 5 days to arrive at the destination? Why have pilots use up all their emergency rations for no reason, especially if they might need them in case they're shot down? Why have them burn 5 days of fuel unnecessarily, when they might need it for dogfights? Why put the pilots through 5 days of sitting in a cockpit unnecessarily?
I've addressed the version of this complaint that can be addressed to
my argument before.
Such snide comments betray your Mr. Rogers demeanor. If you're trying to say the video itself has framerate problems because it was poorly put together, then be a man and say so.
Did you know that you're implicitly insulting women when you say things like that? Not to call this a warning, mind, I'm not taking offense personally, but it's a habit of speech I've started to notice seems to be common here when tempers run thin, and I can't think it's a great one.
Personally, I'm blaming Safari for the framerate. Since I usually don't use a Mac OS, and people rarely test websites on Safari, it's the likeliest cause. Loading the video all the way didn't change anything.
Sure thing. Saying I'm not too bright, but in a "polite" way is ok, then?
I'm not seeing where he called you stupid. He's said all sorts of polite but bad things about your video, and did tell you to shut up (which is a little bit rude). Can you be more specific? All I'm getting is that he doesn't find the video funny or interesting, and I don't think there's anything wrong with giving a bad review provided you can refrain from gratuitous insults to the author.
He thinks it fails because it doesn't offer an argument and he doesn't find it funny. I think some parts are funny, although it's a little long. Perhaps for deliberate effect, but that doesn't mean that I liked that choice.