Lucky wrote:1) It's fiction so we could just throw real world physics out the window if we wanted to, and the real world doesn't always follow the law anyway.
Hoohoo, yeah! I need that quote bronzed! Unfortunately it's true a lot of the time. Well, the first part anyway.
359 wrote:But we shouldn't throw out physics except when we have reason to, which we don't.
And furthermore, the real world always follows the law.
2046 wrote:If it appears not to, it is our own real-world ignorance of said law and its application.
This is the same concept I operate under for ST-v-SW.Net ... much to the dismay of some.
Personally, I'd much rather find at least
quasi-realistic explanations to things. But, like you said 2046, if something appears to defy real world physics, it's our understanding that is at fault.
I sometimes find the implications of vs. scenarios and crossovers funny in this regard though. If we begin cross-pollinating the franchises, sometimes, I think we are forced to change the in-universe rules of the respective franchises, let alone the rules of the real-world. Case in point, Star Wars would not normally come under criticism by real-world science for not having time travel. But cross it with any of a number of other sci-fi settings, including Trek, and its absence indicates a lack of understanding of that particular aspect of the physical universe. By the same token, in a crossover of Trek and Wars, would many of the mysterious "supernatural" aspects such as telepathy and more, actually be connected to the Force, indicating an ignorance of Midi-chlorians?
Some other things I wonder to be very similar, or even the same, assuming the two universes existed. Such as hyperspace and subspace. Not only are the names similar, if inverted, but the limited information given about them sounds rather similar as well.