Relation between Industrial Capacity and Volume
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:31 pm
I've just read on StarDestroyer.Net the thread More T r e k t a r d BS on ST.com.
- By the way, Jedi Master Spock, that is a nice function, which automatically substitute T r e k t a r d with >> Trektard <<.
But it is obstructive, if one only want to quote this term.
- By the way, Jedi Master Spock, that is a nice function, which automatically substitute T r e k t a r d with >> Trektard <<.
- TC Pilot at StarDestroyer.Net wrote:The construction of the second Death Star is absolutely incomparable to the production of Star Destroyers.
What is your opinion?Darth Wong[/url] in the article [url=http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Tech/Industry/Industry2.html]Star Wars: Imperial Industrial Capacity wrote:Since we know that DS2's volume is 3.8E17 m³ and a GCS's volume is 6.5E6 m³, we can easily calculate that DS2 is equivalent in volume to more than fifty billion GCS's. Approximately 60% of DS2 was completed in the six month period before ROTJ (ref. Shadows of the Empire). Therefore, if the Federation had comparable industrial production to the Empire, it should have been able to build 35 billion GCS's in six months, or 2200 GCS's per second. This is obviously not the case, therefore the Federation has at best a miniscule fraction (<1 millionth of a percentage point) of the industrial capacity of the Empire.
- Could the Empire with the same Industrial Capacity, with wich it has built the Death Star, build as many StarDestroyers or Galaxy Class Star Ships, how would be necessary to equal with their total volume that of the Death Star?
- Or would it need more time and effort to build as many StarDestroyers or Galaxy Class Star Ships, how would be necessary to equal with their total volume that of the Death Star?
- Or could it build with the same Industrial Capacity so much StarDestroyers or Galaxy Class Star Ships, that their total volume would be greater than the volume of the Death Star?