Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -no EU

For polite and reasoned discussion of Star Wars and/or Star Trek.
Picard
Starship Captain
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -no EU

Post by Picard » Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:09 pm

How does Star Wars technology exactly work? Put theories and discuss them.

Lucky
Jedi Master
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -n

Post by Lucky » Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:58 am

Picard wrote:How does Star Wars technology exactly work? Put theories and discuss them.
The first Death Star had a powerful magnetic field as a shield.

We know that the trash compactor on the first Death Star was magnetically sealed, and that this magnetic field deflected blaster bolts.

We know Blaster bolts are galvened/packeted particle beams from the Revenge of the Sith novelization.

We know Star Wars shields often appear visually similar to plasma fields.

Picard
Starship Captain
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -n

Post by Picard » Thu Dec 22, 2011 3:57 pm

Lots of magnetics, then.

Now, we know that TL bolts are basically plasma. How are they contained? I'd also expect them to be quite dense, far more so than usual plasma (which is gas).

Lucky
Jedi Master
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -n

Post by Lucky » Fri Dec 23, 2011 1:16 am

Picard wrote:Lots of magnetics, then.
Plasma shielding would act as ECM since it could help hide a ships or whatever from things like radar.

Repulsor lifts like speeders use are just magic as far as I can tell. They are called anti-gravity, but we see speeders fall off cliffs in an episode or two of Star Wars the Clone Wars.
Picard wrote:Now, we know that TL bolts are basically plasma. How are they contained? I'd also expect them to be quite dense, far more so than usual plasma (which is gas).
RotS novelization wrote: "Consoles exploded in fountains of white-hot sparks as they ripped free of their moorings and hurtled through the air. Dead hands spasmed on triggers and blaster bolts sizzled through impossibly intricate lattices of ricochet.

Obi-Wan barely caught some and flipped them at Anakin: a desperation move. Anything to distract him; anything to slow him down. Easily, contemptuously, Anakin sent them back, and the bolts flared between their blades until their galvening faded and the particles of the packeted beams dispersed into radioactive fog."
There is also quotes from the episode "Supply lines" that indicates that all blasters need to work is a suitable power source.

Now on to the Superlasers on the Death Stars
ANH novelization, chapter 11 wrote: "Theoretically, no weapon could penetrate the exceptionally dense stone of the ancient temple, but Luke had seen the shattered remains of Alderaan and knew that for those in the incredible battle station the entire moon would present simply another abstract problem in mass-energy conversion"
ANH novelization, chapter 8) wrote: "It would take a microbreakdown of a portion of this map to reveal a slight reduction in spatial mass, caused by the disappearance of Alderaan."
NPR Radio Drama of ANH wrote: VADER:  Our Prime Weapon is even more powerful than we'd calculated, Lord Tarkin.

TARKIN:   Indeed.
The above quotes taken with movie visuals indicate that the Superlasers on the Death Stars turn matter to energy.

Picard
Starship Captain
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -n

Post by Picard » Fri Dec 23, 2011 12:04 pm

There is also quotes from the episode "Supply lines" that indicates that all blasters need to work is a suitable power source.
So they actually generate particles for use, like phasers?
The above quotes taken with movie visuals indicate that the Superlasers on the Death Stars turn matter to energy.
Pretty much.

Lucky
Jedi Master
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -n

Post by Lucky » Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:23 pm

There is also quotes from the episode "Supply lines" that indicates that all blasters need to work is a suitable power source.
Picard wrote: So they actually generate particles for use, like phasers?
Just watch the clip, and tell me what yu think.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwIxPLwW ... re=related

KSW
Bridge Officer
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -n

Post by KSW » Fri Dec 23, 2011 6:34 pm

Lucky wrote: Now on to the Superlasers on the Death Stars
ANH novelization, chapter 11 wrote: "Theoretically, no weapon could penetrate the exceptionally dense stone of the ancient temple, but Luke had seen the shattered remains of Alderaan and knew that for those in the incredible battle station the entire moon would present simply another abstract problem in mass-energy conversion"
ANH novelization, chapter 8) wrote: "It would take a microbreakdown of a portion of this map to reveal a slight reduction in spatial mass, caused by the disappearance of Alderaan."
NPR Radio Drama of ANH wrote: VADER:  Our Prime Weapon is even more powerful than we'd calculated, Lord Tarkin.

TARKIN:   Indeed.
The above quotes taken with movie visuals indicate that the Superlasers on the Death Stars turn matter to energy.
Or that it's powered by fusion, which is the only way that matter can be converted to energy (i.e. without combining it with anti-matter): by converting lighter elements to heavier ones, incurring a lower net mass in the products than the reagents.


Matter-Energy is an exothermic reaction, matter is the lowest energy-state, and therefore no such "chain reaction" can happen, since energy can't be created.

Likewise, Wong says that Alderaan explodes at .05C, yielding an energy-figure of 1E+38 J.

The problem here is twofold:

First, that's 10,000 times the amount of power needed to vaporize the planet. However, we see the "Alderaan Graveyard" of meteors, when the Falcon enters the Alderaan system; therefore the planet's mass is still orbiting the Alderaan sun.

This indicates a power-figure of no greater than E+29J , i.e. the maximum energy needed for the planet's mass to reach escape-velocity without breaking stellar-orbit. This would yield a max. velocity of 11kps-- not 15,000kps, as Wong claims happened (i.e. .05C).

This requires only an energy-shift of no more than 11J/g.

This weaves a definite paradox between the observed events.

My answer:

The Death Star was essentially a giant hyperdrive-system, both for its own propulsion as well as to destroy planets.


Here, the planet exploded from its own ambient heat, by its mass being converted to tachyon ala hyperdrive. By shortening the distance to outer space by a factor of over 1363:1, this increased the planet's rate of thermal radiation into outer space by a factor of over 18 million.
Thus, the planet exploded by a simple cooling of its entire mass a few degrees C, which easily represents a specific-heat of 11J/g.

Thus, the mysterious "tachyonic hyperdrive" technology which shortened distances by millions of times, here shrunk the planet's distances by merely a thousand or so.

This would also explain why it couldn't destroy Yavin, i.e. the tachyonic field wasn't big enough. If the Superlaser were a DET or chain-reaction beam, then it could easily make the gas-giant go nova via fusion-reaction. But here, it could only distribute the planet's heat within itself, which was nowhere near as discrepant.

This is the only answer which maintains consistency with both canon and physics.

Picard
Starship Captain
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -n

Post by Picard » Fri Dec 23, 2011 9:09 pm

Lucky wrote:
There is also quotes from the episode "Supply lines" that indicates that all blasters need to work is a suitable power source.
Picard wrote: So they actually generate particles for use, like phasers?
Just watch the clip, and tell me what yu think.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwIxPLwW ... re=related
They mention ammunition, but only in context of fleet running out of them. Wierd.

Lucky
Jedi Master
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -n

Post by Lucky » Sat Dec 24, 2011 4:37 pm

Lucky wrote: Now on to the Superlasers on the Death Stars
ANH novelization, chapter 11 wrote: "Theoretically, no weapon could penetrate the exceptionally dense stone of the ancient temple, but Luke had seen the shattered remains of Alderaan and knew that for those in the incredible battle station the entire moon would present simply another abstract problem in mass-energy conversion"
ANH novelization, chapter 8) wrote: "It would take a microbreakdown of a portion of this map to reveal a slight reduction in spatial mass, caused by the disappearance of Alderaan."
NPR Radio Drama of ANH wrote: VADER:  Our Prime Weapon is even more powerful than we'd calculated, Lord Tarkin.

TARKIN:   Indeed.
The above quotes taken with movie visuals indicate that the Superlasers on the Death Stars turn matter to energy.
MauriceWindows wrote: Or that it's powered by fusion, which is the only way that matter can be converted to energy (i.e. without combining it with anti-matter): by converting lighter elements to heavier ones, incurring a lower net mass in the products than the reagents.


Matter-Energy is an exothermic reaction, matter is the lowest energy-state, and therefore no such "chain reaction" can happen, since energy can't be created.

Likewise, Wong says that Alderaan explodes at .05C, yielding an energy-figure of 1E+38 J.

The problem here is twofold:

First, that's 10,000 times the amount of power needed to vaporize the planet. However, we see the "Alderaan Graveyard" of meteors, when the Falcon enters the Alderaan system; therefore the planet's mass is still orbiting the Alderaan sun.

This indicates a power-figure of no greater than E+29J , i.e. the maximum energy needed for the planet's mass to reach escape-velocity without breaking stellar-orbit. This would yield a max. velocity of 11kps-- not 15,000kps, as Wong claims happened (i.e. .05C).

This requires only an energy-shift of no more than 11J/g.

This weaves a definite paradox between the observed events.

My answer:

The Death Star was essentially a giant hyperdrive-system, both for its own propulsion as well as to destroy planets.


Here, the planet exploded from its own ambient heat, by its mass being converted to tachyon ala hyperdrive. By shortening the distance to outer space by a factor of over 1363:1, this increased the planet's rate of thermal radiation into outer space by a factor of over 18 million.
Thus, the planet exploded by a simple cooling of its entire mass a few degrees C, which easily represents a specific-heat of 11J/g.

Thus, the mysterious "tachyonic hyperdrive" technology which shortened distances by millions of times, here shrunk the planet's distances by merely a thousand or so.

This would also explain why it couldn't destroy Yavin, i.e. the tachyonic field wasn't big enough. If the Superlaser were a DET or chain-reaction beam, then it could easily make the gas-giant go nova via fusion-reaction. But here, it could only distribute the planet's heat within itself, which was nowhere near as discrepant.

This is the only answer which maintains consistency with both canon and physics.
You're using the extended universe which is not aloud in this thread.


1) The G-Canon quotes say the Superlaser turns matter to energy through a chain reaction.

2) The Superlaser just makes thing disappear in a firery looking cloud.

It's best to just say the superlaser is magictech, and move on.

Lucky
Jedi Master
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -n

Post by Lucky » Sat Dec 24, 2011 5:57 pm

There is also quotes from the episode "Supply lines" that indicates that all blasters need to work is a suitable power source.
Picard wrote: So they actually generate particles for use, like phasers?
Lucky wrote: Just watch the clip, and tell me what yu think.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwIxPLwW ... re=related
Picard wrote: They mention ammunition, but only in context of fleet running out of them. Wierd.
Maybe they are talking about torpedos for the fighters/bombers?

Picard
Starship Captain
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -n

Post by Picard » Sat Dec 24, 2011 6:03 pm

Possible.

KSW
Bridge Officer
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -n

Post by KSW » Sun Dec 25, 2011 5:01 am

Picard wrote:Lots of magnetics, then.

Now, we know that TL bolts are basically plasma. How are they contained? I'd also expect them to be quite dense, far more so than usual plasma (which is gas).
A self-contained magnetic bottle, which ruptures upon impact.
This spills the plasma on the target; that's also why it would be deflected by a magnetic seal.

KSW
Bridge Officer
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -n

Post by KSW » Sun Dec 25, 2011 5:09 am

Lucky wrote:
Lucky wrote: Now on to the Superlasers on the Death Stars
ANH novelization, chapter 11 wrote: "Theoretically, no weapon could penetrate the exceptionally dense stone of the ancient temple, but Luke had seen the shattered remains of Alderaan and knew that for those in the incredible battle station the entire moon would present simply another abstract problem in mass-energy conversion"
ANH novelization, chapter 8) wrote: "It would take a microbreakdown of a portion of this map to reveal a slight reduction in spatial mass, caused by the disappearance of Alderaan."
NPR Radio Drama of ANH wrote: VADER:  Our Prime Weapon is even more powerful than we'd calculated, Lord Tarkin.

TARKIN:   Indeed.
The above quotes taken with movie visuals indicate that the Superlasers on the Death Stars turn matter to energy.
MauriceWindows wrote: Or that it's powered by fusion, which is the only way that matter can be converted to energy (i.e. without combining it with anti-matter): by converting lighter elements to heavier ones, incurring a lower net mass in the products than the reagents.


Matter-Energy is an exothermic reaction, matter is the lowest energy-state, and therefore no such "chain reaction" can happen, since energy can't be created.

Likewise, Wong says that Alderaan explodes at .05C, yielding an energy-figure of 1E+38 J.

The problem here is twofold:

First, that's 10,000 times the amount of power needed to vaporize the planet. However, we see the "Alderaan Graveyard" of meteors, when the Falcon enters the Alderaan system; therefore the planet's mass is still orbiting the Alderaan sun.

This indicates a power-figure of no greater than E+29J , i.e. the maximum energy needed for the planet's mass to reach escape-velocity without breaking stellar-orbit. This would yield a max. velocity of 11kps-- not 15,000kps, as Wong claims happened (i.e. .05C).

This requires only an energy-shift of no more than 11J/g.

This weaves a definite paradox between the observed events.

My answer:

The Death Star was essentially a giant hyperdrive-system, both for its own propulsion as well as to destroy planets.


Here, the planet exploded from its own ambient heat, by its mass being converted to tachyon ala hyperdrive. By shortening the distance to outer space by a factor of over 1363:1, this increased the planet's rate of thermal radiation into outer space by a factor of over 18 million.
Thus, the planet exploded by a simple cooling of its entire mass a few degrees C, which easily represents a specific-heat of 11J/g.

Thus, the mysterious "tachyonic hyperdrive" technology which shortened distances by millions of times, here shrunk the planet's distances by merely a thousand or so.

This would also explain why it couldn't destroy Yavin, i.e. the tachyonic field wasn't big enough. If the Superlaser were a DET or chain-reaction beam, then it could easily make the gas-giant go nova via fusion-reaction. But here, it could only distribute the planet's heat within itself, which was nowhere near as discrepant.

This is the only answer which maintains consistency with both canon and physics.
You're using the extended universe which is not aloud in this thread.


.
You'll have to be more specific than that. I'm not using any EU-canon, simply the on-screen evidence by which distances become compressed in hyperspace in a one-step shift.
1) The G-Canon quotes say the Superlaser turns matter to energy through a chain reaction.
No, that's your interpretation of what they say. Be careful to remember the difference.

Mass-energy conversion could mean the fusion-reaction that powers the superlaser, nothing more.

in physics. the First Rule of Thermodynamics applies: i.e. energy can neither be created nor destroyed, therefore it has to go somewhere and be accounted for.

Here in this case we also run into the Second Law of Thermodyamics: i.e. the law of entropy, whereby heat always flows to a cooler surface, from higher energy to lower energy.

Normally with a planet, heat radiates into space at a slow rate due to the distances involved. But if this distance were shortened by 1363:1, then this rate would increase by a factor of over 18 million (i.e. 1361 ^2, due to the inverse-square law of radiation), and the entropy-factor would increase accordingly.

Thus out-radiation of the planet's ambient thermal energy, would exceed the binding-energy of the planet itself, of 11j/g.

Thus essentially, the planet's thermal-kinetic energy reverts back to potential energy, and the mass becomes distributed at a distance from the planetary core as the Alderaan Graveyard.

This exactly the reverse of how the planet got hot in the first place when it first formed via asteroids slamming together due to gravity-- i.e. potential energy converted to kinetic.
Basically this just reverses the process.

I look at it like the planet being a ship, and the Death Star being a hyperdrive-motivator that shifts it into hyperspace. (However it doesn't accelerate the planet like a hyperdrive does, so it doesn't need to worry about energy for that).

Let's look at the size-ratio's between a hyperdrive motivator, and the mass of a starship. In TPM, Watto's hyperdrive-motivator is a fwe kg's at most, while Padme's ship is at least a few thousand kg's.

So let's say that the ratio of a hyperdrive-motivator to a ship's mass, is about 1000:1.

Now let's also look at the effect it has on the ship, allowing it to travel at least a million times faster than in realspace. So let's just say, for the sake of argument, that it's 1 million:1, in order to reach 20,000 C by using fusion-power as an energy-source.

Now let's look at the mass of the Death Star.
Darkstar's page on volumetrics says that the Death Star is about 600 trillion tons, i.e. 6e+17kg.

So since it's only changing the planet's dimensions by a factor of about 1000:1 (vs. 1million:1 for a starship), then the reactor-mass ratio changes to 1 million:1, or 6 E+23.

Finally, since since it's a weapon, not an engine, then it can expand these specs a bit, while still having a wide safety-margin the DS itself.

So it's quite reasonable, given the information we see in the films, for the DS reactor to destroy a planet by simple entropy of its own ambient heat into the relatively cold space around it, via hyper-shifting its space to shorten those distances.

Lucky
Jedi Master
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -n

Post by Lucky » Mon Dec 26, 2011 10:20 am

MauriceWindows wrote: You'll have to be more specific than that. I'm not using any EU-canon, simply the on-screen evidence by which distances become compressed in hyperspace in a one-step shift.
You suggest the Death Star uses tachyonic hyperdrive technology, but there is none talked about in G or T canon levels as far as I know. The means you are either using EU(C-canon and lower), or are not providing evidence.

If the tachyonic hyperdrive technology is from G or T-levels of canon then please provide the quotes because I would like to see them.
MauriceWindows wrote: No, that's your interpretation of what they say. Be careful to remember the difference.
Nope, it's what the G-canon quotes say.
MauriceWindows wrote: Mass-energy conversion could mean the fusion-reaction that powers the superlaser, nothing more.
ANH novelization, chapter 11 wrote: "Theoretically, no weapon could penetrate the exceptionally dense stone of the ancient temple, but Luke had seen the shattered remains of Alderaan and knew that for those in the incredible battle station the entire moon would present simply another abstract problem in mass-energy conversion"
Luke's thoughts don't make sense if it was just a matter of the weapon being powered by a reactor. He is thinking about the superlaser it's self causing the matter to energy reaction.

If it was just a matter of building a big enough reactor then there is no point in building a superlaser instead of a large turbolaser.
ANH novelization, chapter 8 wrote: "It would take a microbreakdown of a portion of this map to reveal a slight reduction in spatial mass, caused by the disappearance of Alderaan."
Vader is thinking about the superlaser removing mass from the galaxy, but we know Alderaan never left orbit, and is exactly where it is suppose to be. The only way to remove mass from Alderaan is to convert part of it to energy because energy does not have mass.
NPR Radio Drama of ANH wrote: VADER:  Our Prime Weapon is even more powerful than we'd calculated, Lord Tarkin.

TARKIN:   Indeed.
If it was just a matter of having a big reactor then there is no point to building a complex chain reaction weapon.

MauriceWindows wrote: in physics. the First Rule of Thermodynamics applies: i.e. energy can neither be created nor destroyed, therefore it has to go somewhere and be accounted for.

Here in this case we also run into the Second Law of Thermodyamics: i.e. the law of entropy, whereby heat always flows to a cooler surface, from higher energy to lower energy.

Normally with a planet, heat radiates into space at a slow rate due to the distances involved. But if this distance were shortened by 1363:1, then this rate would increase by a factor of over 18 million (i.e. 1361 ^2, due to the inverse-square law of radiation), and the entropy-factor would increase accordingly.

Thus out-radiation of the planet's ambient thermal energy, would exceed the binding-energy of the planet itself, of 11j/g.

Thus essentially, the planet's thermal-kinetic energy reverts back to potential energy, and the mass becomes distributed at a distance from the planetary core as the Alderaan Graveyard.

This exactly the reverse of how the planet got hot in the first place when it first formed via asteroids slamming together due to gravity-- i.e. potential energy converted to kinetic.
Basically this just reverses the process.

I look at it like the planet being a ship, and the Death Star being a hyperdrive-motivator that shifts it into hyperspace. (However it doesn't accelerate the planet like a hyperdrive does, so it doesn't need to worry about energy for that).

Let's look at the size-ratio's between a hyperdrive motivator, and the mass of a starship. In TPM, Watto's hyperdrive-motivator is a fwe kg's at most, while Padme's ship is at least a few thousand kg's.

So let's say that the ratio of a hyperdrive-motivator to a ship's mass, is about 1000:1.

Now let's also look at the effect it has on the ship, allowing it to travel at least a million times faster than in realspace. So let's just say, for the sake of argument, that it's 1 million:1, in order to reach 20,000 C by using fusion-power as an energy-source.

Now let's look at the mass of the Death Star.
Darkstar's page on volumetrics says that the Death Star is about 600 trillion tons, i.e. 6e+17kg.

So since it's only changing the planet's dimensions by a factor of about 1000:1 (vs. 1million:1 for a starship), then the reactor-mass ratio changes to 1 million:1, or 6 E+23.

Finally, since since it's a weapon, not an engine, then it can expand these specs a bit, while still having a wide safety-margin the DS itself.

So it's quite reasonable, given the information we see in the films, for the DS reactor to destroy a planet by simple entropy of its own ambient heat into the relatively cold space around it, via hyper-shifting its space to shorten those distances.
That is an awful lot of technobabble.


Your theory is the Superlasers shrinks stuff so they radiate heat faster, and then return them to normal size causing them to fall apart?

Some possible problems:
Superlasers have the same effect on ships as planets. Your theory only takes into account Alderaan blowing up.

This as stated ignores Luke's thoughts on the matter much like the EU information often does.. He is much better informed on what Star Wars technologies can do then you

Hyperdrives let ships enter and stay in a dimension or universe referred to as hyperspace as I recall.

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Star Wars technology mechanics and physics background -n

Post by Praeothmin » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:19 am

Maurice Windows wrote:Mass-energy conversion could mean the fusion-reaction that powers the superlaser, nothing more.

in physics. the First Rule of Thermodynamics applies: i.e. energy can neither be created nor destroyed, therefore it has to go somewhere and be accounted for.

Here in this case we also run into the Second Law of Thermodyamics: i.e. the law of entropy, whereby heat always flows to a cooler surface, from higher energy to lower energy.

Normally with a planet, heat radiates into space at a slow rate due to the distances involved. But if this distance were shortened by 1363:1, then this rate would increase by a factor of over 18 million (i.e. 1361 ^2, due to the inverse-square law of radiation), and the entropy-factor would increase accordingly.

Thus out-radiation of the planet's ambient thermal energy, would exceed the binding-energy of the planet itself, of 11j/g.

Thus essentially, the planet's thermal-kinetic energy reverts back to potential energy, and the mass becomes distributed at a distance from the planetary core as the Alderaan Graveyard.

This exactly the reverse of how the planet got hot in the first place when it first formed via asteroids slamming together due to gravity-- i.e. potential energy converted to kinetic.
Basically this just reverses the process.

I look at it like the planet being a ship, and the Death Star being a hyperdrive-motivator that shifts it into hyperspace. (However it doesn't accelerate the planet like a hyperdrive does, so it doesn't need to worry about energy for that).

Let's look at the size-ratio's between a hyperdrive motivator, and the mass of a starship. In TPM, Watto's hyperdrive-motivator is a fwe kg's at most, while Padme's ship is at least a few thousand kg's.

So let's say that the ratio of a hyperdrive-motivator to a ship's mass, is about 1000:1.

Now let's also look at the effect it has on the ship, allowing it to travel at least a million times faster than in realspace. So let's just say, for the sake of argument, that it's 1 million:1, in order to reach 20,000 C by using fusion-power as an energy-source.

Now let's look at the mass of the Death Star.
Darkstar's page on volumetrics says that the Death Star is about 600 trillion tons, i.e. 6e+17kg.

So since it's only changing the planet's dimensions by a factor of about 1000:1 (vs. 1million:1 for a starship), then the reactor-mass ratio changes to 1 million:1, or 6 E+23.

Finally, since since it's a weapon, not an engine, then it can expand these specs a bit, while still having a wide safety-margin the DS itself.

So it's quite reasonable, given the information we see in the films, for the DS reactor to destroy a planet by simple entropy of its own ambient heat into the relatively cold space around it, via hyper-shifting its space to shorten those distances.
And this long-winded explanation proves beyond any reasonable doubt that KSW is back, and now called Maurice Windows...
:)

Post Reply