I tend to think of "one third impulse" as acceleration, not top speed. Makes a whole lot more sense that way. And I generally prefer my own fanfics to that of the TM. :PPraeothmin wrote:Actually, according to the TNG tech manual, full impulse is 1/4 lightspeed, or 75 000 km/s.
The YAWCF debate (poll)
- l33telboi
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 910
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 7:15 am
- Location: Finland
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:26 pm
- Contact:
I have also not given the Judgment helmsman a name. I was too disheartened by all the pop-up ads on the random name generators.Airlocke_Jedi_Knight wrote:What about the Helmsman for the Judgement being a Zabrak?
I will say Imperial officers have a strong tendency to be human, in the movies and in the EU...
- Airlocke_Jedi_Knight
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:55 pm
- Location: Camby
- Contact:
-
- Security Officer
- Posts: 5837
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm
Actually that was not the maximum acceleration possible on impulse power, it was a limitation put in place to prevent excessive time dialation effects. In an emergency, a ship can go considerably faster.Praeothmin wrote: Actually, according to the TNG tech manual, full impulse is 1/4 lightspeed, or 75 000 km/s.
Mike D wrote:That brings up the age old question: Will transporters work through SW shields? ;-)
I think it should be possible, at least initally, considering that there are a few examples of Federation transporters being able to beam through more primitve shields, like those used by Kazon.Praeothmin wrote:I see no reason why they should, except that there was no mention that the Imperial shuttle had them raised at the moment of transport.
If that's the case, you can call her M'zzkiti. ;-)Praeothmin wrote: Why not Caïtian (feline humanoids)?
-Mike
- Praeothmin
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 3920
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
- Location: Quebec City
If we were to assume that SW shields are more primitive then ST shields, which I see no reason to believe or assume...Mike D wrote:I think it should be possible, at least initally, considering that there are a few examples of Federation transporters being able to beam through more primitve shields, like those used by Kazon.
-
- Security Officer
- Posts: 5837
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm
Primitive is probably not a good way to describe them. More like they won't be ready to deal with something like a transporter the first few times they are used against them, but later on, they can be easily adjusted to defend against them.Praeothmin wrote:If we were to assume that SW shields are more primitive then ST shields, which I see no reason to believe or assume...Mike D wrote:I think it should be possible, at least initally, considering that there are a few examples of Federation transporters being able to beam through more primitve shields, like those used by Kazon.
-Mike
- Praeothmin
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 3920
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
- Location: Quebec City
I still don't see why.
In ST, most of the races that could bypass shields had Technobabble on their side (Subspace Transporters, somehow able to ignore shields altoghether, Borg adaptivity, etc...).
The Feds don't have anything "technobabbly" helping them bypass shields, so I don't see why the rayshielding of SW ships would have any problem stopping the annular confinement beam, or the energy "pulse" of the Transporters.
In ST, most of the races that could bypass shields had Technobabble on their side (Subspace Transporters, somehow able to ignore shields altoghether, Borg adaptivity, etc...).
The Feds don't have anything "technobabbly" helping them bypass shields, so I don't see why the rayshielding of SW ships would have any problem stopping the annular confinement beam, or the energy "pulse" of the Transporters.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:26 pm
- Contact:
- The Corporal
- Bridge Officer
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 1:10 pm
- Location: Ontario's Poopchute
-
- Security Officer
- Posts: 5837
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm
-
- Security Officer
- Posts: 5837
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm
As in the case of the Kazon and a few other Delta Quadrant groups that Voyager was able to get by, the SW shields are not set up to block the transporter's beam, what with all the potential frequency "holes" that should exist in them that would not be in the Alpha Quadrant ST ship shields that have long been adapted against such a thing. Once the transporter is discovered, the Imperials should be able to adapt to it by adjusting their ray shields accordingly.Praeothmin wrote:I still don't see why.
In ST, most of the races that could bypass shields had Technobabble on their side (Subspace Transporters, somehow able to ignore shields altoghether, Borg adaptivity, etc...).
The Feds don't have anything "technobabbly" helping them bypass shields, so I don't see why the rayshielding of SW ships would have any problem stopping the annular confinement beam, or the energy "pulse" of the Transporters.
-Mike
- The Corporal
- Bridge Officer
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 1:10 pm
- Location: Ontario's Poopchute
Lets see:Mike DiCenso wrote:Those names seem awfully familar....
-Mike
Mass Effect
The Green Berets character
RL Padre
RL Padre
The Green Berets character
The Green Berets character
The Green Berets character
I think there all good names personally, perhaps not Kowalski. Seems in every American war movie there's a guy with that name.
-
- Security Officer
- Posts: 5837
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm
-
- Bridge Officer
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 4:34 am
Shepard and Kowalski also hale from Stargate...The Corporal wrote:Lets see:Mike DiCenso wrote:Those names seem awfully familar....
-Mike
Mass Effect
The Green Berets character
RL Padre
RL Padre
The Green Berets character
The Green Berets character
The Green Berets character
I think there all good names personally, perhaps not Kowalski. Seems in every American war movie there's a guy with that name.
- The Corporal
- Bridge Officer
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 1:10 pm
- Location: Ontario's Poopchute