Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

For polite and reasoned discussion of Star Wars and/or Star Trek.
Post Reply
Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

Post by Admiral Breetai » Tue Feb 07, 2012 7:58 pm

Trinoya wrote:For the same reason he has ignored dozens of posts in this thread. If he had a counter argument (namely one that hadn't already been debunked) he'd have used it by now.
I personally believe he's also afraid of certain debaters..and wont come near some of us without heavily borrowing from Wongs website or asking someone with more experience to make up an argument he can easily parrot
Trinoya wrote:The short of it was, he set up an un-winnable scenario for his side, he'd be better off redoing it at this point.
but surely the quintillions of droids! and quadrillions of vessels!!
Mike DiCenso wrote: was mentioned several times in DS9
-Mike
it was flat out weaponized by DS9 and so wide spread that Bashirfounder working under the radar slowly fashioned a home made sun buster from what he could scrounge up without raising any alarm bells.

if a changeling can pull a McVeigh with proto matter while needing to keep a low profile to claim a desperate Federation wouldn't build protomatter warheads is crazy and not in line with the facts
Trinoya wrote: Battle of Cardassia.
Chintoka as well Favor the bold..and a few other instances

User avatar
mojo
Starship Captain
Posts: 1159
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:47 am

Re: Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

Post by mojo » Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:11 am

MauriceWindows wrote:
mojo wrote:idiocy. i'm not even just being an ass. 1,000 years for the republic as stated in the prequels - idiocy. yes, pt states 1,000 years. ot states 1,000 generations. you can't warn someone for choosing g canon over g canon. give us a break, mike.
Then Han shot first... and I'm not even just being an ass either.
It's called retcon.
except that you ARE just being an ass, and an ignorant one at that, because the difference is that in the blu-ray ot he STILL says generations, whereas han does NOT shoot first. surely you can do better than that. there is a huge difference between a retcon and a simple contradiction. han shooting first, then later the film being changed so that han does NOT shoot first, that is a retcon which changes canon. lucas forgetting that obi-wan stated generations, then having palpatine state years instead, that is not a retcon. canon is not changed. until the film is changed so that obi-wan no longer states generations, there is no retcon, there is a simple contradiction between the two statements, and since they are both g-fucking-level canon, we can very well choose which one we like. so give us a break, maurice.

KSW
Bridge Officer
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

Post by KSW » Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:20 am

mojo wrote:
MauriceWindows wrote:
mojo wrote:idiocy. i'm not even just being an ass. 1,000 years for the republic as stated in the prequels - idiocy. yes, pt states 1,000 years. ot states 1,000 generations. you can't warn someone for choosing g canon over g canon. give us a break, mike.
Then Han shot first... and I'm not even just being an ass either.
It's called retcon.
except that you ARE just being an ass, and an ignorant one at that, because the difference is that in the blu-ray ot he STILL says generations, whereas han does NOT shoot first.

since they are both g-fucking-level canon, we can very well choose which one we like.
Only in your MIND, my young Padawan. In reality the most recent canon supersedes earlier canon. Always.
Last edited by KSW on Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:49 am, edited 3 times in total.

KSW
Bridge Officer
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

Post by KSW » Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:35 am

Admiral Breetai wrote: it was flat out weaponized by DS9 and so wide spread that Bashirfounder working under the radar slowly fashioned a home made sun buster from what he could scrounge up without raising any alarm bells.

if a changeling can pull a McVeigh with proto matter
Kira specifically said it was Trilithium-- or is that the same thing?

If Starfleet wanted, they could just pull a Captain Jellico and put a cloaked trilithium warhead outside every key star in the SW galaxy-- including a few unimportant uninhabited systems as a demonstration-- send an envoy to the Emperor, and just tell him to surrender or they could destroy any and every system in the galaxy at once.
And if he thinks they're bluffing: BOOM! Hoth. BOOM! Dagobah. BOOM! Dantooine.
BOOM! Any of a thousand other key uninhabited systems essential to the space-lanes.
Win: Starfleet. Casualties: zero.

KSW
Bridge Officer
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

Post by KSW » Wed Feb 08, 2012 6:25 am

Lucky wrote:
StarWarsStarTrek wrote: That's bullshit. You know as well as I that hyperdrive allows for trans-galactic travel within hours.
Only on certain precharteed and well maintained hyper-lanes. This is why some back water stone age planet matters in Star Wars.
Let's also quantify "hours" and "trans-galactic."
Han Solo from the ANH novelization:
"You know, even I get boarded sometimes, Jabba. Did you think I dumped
that spice because I got tired of ts smell? I wanted to deliver it as much
as you wanted to receive it. I had no choice." Again the sardonic
smile. "As you say, I'm too valuable to fry. But I've got a charter now and I can pay
you back, plus a little extra. I just need some more time. I can give you a
thousand on account, the rest in three weeks."
So it's three-week round trip from Tatooine to Alderaan, real-time (vs. hyperspace-time, which the novel describes as being shorter in comparison; so while they were on the Falcon only a few hours, the trip was more than 10 days real-time-- and Vader and Leia got there in about the same time.
Likewise, Solo also says in the ANH novelization:
"I've been from one end of this galaxy to the other," the pilot
boasted, "and I've seen a lot of strange things.
If one could do that in a matter of hours, it wouldn't be worthy of a "boast."
Like saying "I drove across California." Whoop-de-fricking do. More like months, years.

Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

Post by Admiral Breetai » Wed Feb 08, 2012 6:37 am

MauriceWindows wrote:
Kira specifically said it was Trilithium-- or is that the same thing?
o.
yeah but a star buster needs proto matter to work effectively and they did revive a dead star with one earlier.

also proto matter weaponized was so wide spread even the Maquis of all people got atheir hands on some and used it to blast apart a freighter in one ep

User avatar
mojo
Starship Captain
Posts: 1159
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:47 am

Re: Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

Post by mojo » Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:52 am

MauriceWindows wrote:Only in your MIND, my young Padawan. In reality the most recent canon supersedes earlier canon. Always.
yes, i know. but that doesn't apply here. the pt 1,000 years quote is NOT more recent canon than the ot 1,000 generations quote. both quotes are the exact same level of canon. this is what i'm saying. the blu-ray versions of all six films were released all at once and were even packaged together as 'the complete saga'. since lucas says that the newest versions of the films always make up the canon, and in the blu-ray versions (which are of course the newest versions) both quotes still exist, one cannot supersede the other.
so, again, until we have a version in which obi-wan no longer says 1,000 generations or palpatine no longer says 1,000 years, there is no retcon, and the canon level of the quotes are identical. both g-fucking-level canon.
Last edited by mojo on Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:12 am, edited 2 times in total.

KSW
Bridge Officer
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

Post by KSW » Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:09 am

mojo wrote:lucas says that the newest versions of the films always make up the canon, and in the blu-ray versions (which are of course the newest versions) both quotes still exist, one cannot supersede the other..
They're unchanged from their prior versions in this respect, therefore they're not "newer versions," and so my argument stands.

User avatar
mojo
Starship Captain
Posts: 1159
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:47 am

Re: Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

Post by mojo » Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:52 am

how can the pt be a 'newer version' of star wars than the ot? it's one story that stretches through six films. they're being sold all bundled together for god's sake.
when star wars was released to standard dvd, lucas made changes to the ot so that the whole story would mesh better and stated that the new versions were canon. so at that point the g-canon consisted of the three prequels and the new versions of the ot. as much as we hated it, i don't remember anyone arguing that the pt and the ot were not meant to be seen as one story. he did not remove or change the 1,000 generations quote.
so now the six films are released on blu-ray simultaeously and sold as a bundle which is actively marketed as 'the entire saga'. more changes to the ot and a few to the pt.
how can you argue that one part of the story is higher canon than the other? a thing cannot be more canon than itself!
i'm extremely tired. maybe i'm just missing something, or i'm just not getting my argument out correctly. it seems ridiculously obvious to me right now.

User avatar
mojo
Starship Captain
Posts: 1159
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:47 am

Re: Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

Post by mojo » Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:24 am

what the fuck? what happened to the post you made about the pt being a newer version of star wars than the ot? where did it go? the one where you said i was actually wong in disguise and you couldn't believe i was making the argument that we should accept a bundle of movies labelled as 'the complete saga' to be the same level of canon throughout? was that just a figment of my imagination?
MauriceWindows wrote:
mojo wrote:lucas says that the newest versions of the films always make up the canon, and in the blu-ray versions (which are of course the newest versions) both quotes still exist, one cannot supersede the other..
They're unchanged from their prior versions in this respect, therefore they're not "newer versions," and so my argument stands.
uh, no it doesn't, and as far as i can tell i've explained why multiple times.
and now you're arguing that even though the blu-ray star wars films include multiple changes, we should not accept them as newer versions because they don't contain a fix for a single continuity error or contradiction. likewise you're still arguing that although lucas has stated that each new release of the films becomes canon when released, the pt is still somehow higher canon than the ot, regardless of the fact that the pt and ot blu-ray trilogies are bundled together and that bundle is specifically marketed as a single story and as the definitive version of that story.

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Wed Feb 08, 2012 1:04 pm

sonofccn wrote: Actually 990 lightyears every eight hours or so would exceed 1 million c. So your response is invalid to a lenght of mere hours.

Just in case your curious 24 hours a day divided by eight would equal three which timed against 990 light years would equal 2970 light years a day timed against 365 would equal 1084050 lightyears a year.
You are indeed right. My apologies. But then, upon looking at this, if Wars hyperdrive speeds were only 1 million C, it would have taken as long as a week to a month, depending on the size of the Wars galaxy, for Maul to travel to Tatooine. In reality, he did it in half a day.
I'd actually would like to see you actually cataloge these incidents not just handwave claiming that they are there. For instance Voyager has examples of both less than 1000c max speed as well as over 20,000c.
Yeah, "over 20,000c" is so damn impressive.

The entire series, again, is the evidence. That is, that the journey back to the Alpha Quadrant took seven years.

Then you are being disengenious. You claimed "They considered a few hundred million dead to be a devastating war." when the few hundred million dead were the Cardassians killed on a single planet in a few hours in an adhoc retaliation for them switching sides and was conducted with heavy infantry use.
What you Leave Behind Season 7 DS9 wrote:WEYOUN: We have a security breach.
FOUNDER: The guards will deal with it. Is there a problem?
WEYOUN: The guards. There're only a handful left in the building. I sent the rest to help eradicate the Cardassians
Picard talking about the Federation-Cardassian war:

PICARD: Evek, the last war caused massive destruction... took millions of lives. Don't send our two peoples back down that path... not like this. History is in your hands -- right now. Give us one last chance for peace.

Okay? I'm not sure how well 300 trillion meshes with the Lucas's universe
Because Lucas envisioned a galactic civilization? 300 trillion dead is actually too low when one does the math.
but yes 300 trillion is greater than 900 billion. Through the Dominion were first and foremost conquerers who wanted to dominant solids and the Vong unless I'm mistaken were religious zealots who wanted to purge all unclean life.
That is true. But my point still stands, and that is that the Wars galaxy is simply fundamentally on a larger scale than Trek.
Actually he also insuated that as a free an open Democracy which actively shares and coloberates resources and ideas with each other they are more open to invention than say the repressive Dominon.
Arguably true, but it should not be enough to outpace 10,000 years of advancement.

Considering that by 2150 decades after first contact the best ship mankind could possibly build was fitted was sensors described thusly:
Broken bow (ENT:season 1) wrote:T'POL: It's just background noise. Your sensors aren't capable of isolating plasma decay.
TUCKER: How can you be so damn sure what our sensors can do?
T'POL: Vulcan children play with toys that are more sophisticated.
As well their ships can do warp seven while the warp five engine was a major advancment for human kind
Fallen Hero (ENT-season 1) wrote:T'POL: The Sh'Raan is capable of warp seven. If we could maintain warp five we'd reach them in twelve minutes.
I think its fair to say that on first contact they ate our lunch.
They ate our lunch, but they didn't squash us like insects. Not as if Trek technological advancement were as fast as claimed.

Nor is Trek any less centralized than Wars...

Gambit Part 2:

RIKER: What's going to happen to the mercenaries?

PICARD: They have been detained by the Vulcan authorities, for the moment. But they're also facing charges from the Klingons, the Cardassians, the Ferengi, and about seven other worlds. We won't be hearing from them for quite some time.

Implies that the vast majority of each race is concentrated in their home planet to the point of their entire species being syndectoted with their planet. Yet the Vulcan homeworld only has 5 billion or so inhabitants, and Earth hardly looks like Coruscant from our glimpses of it.

Therefore, it is highly likely that the trillions of officers and trillions of army corps in the Empire outnumber the population of the Alpha Quadrant.


In a handful of years. So not only were you wrong about only 11% being charted the speed in which they are now charting the cosmos is absolutely staggering. In the we'll chart the entire galaxy in a couple of decades sense since the point seems to be missing you.
No, you won't, or else the Enterprise would have been retired long ago. The Federation still has exploration vessels, and it's far easier to chart the first 30% than the unknown reaches of the galaxy with menaces like the Borg and the Dominion or other uknowns out there.

But I hardly see how this is going to matter, because the war certainly won't take decades anyway if the imperial army outnumbers the Federation civilian population.
Actually the EU strictly says otherwise and the only claim for it would be an sure of herself Jedi.
Obi Wan trusted her more than any other in the galaxy when it comes to coordinates and mapping (AOTC novel). Nor is it reasonable to think that Jocasta Nu was a self-deluded idiot who thought that they had charted the galaxy if there were well known, uncharted parts of it.

Conversely it has been shown to you in T-canon that not all hyperspace routes, massive ones which could tilt a war, in the Core systems are charted in the waning days of the Republic. And 25,000 or 1,000 they've been at it a lot longer than the Federation has been charting space.
Who gives a flying damn? The Federation doesn't know jack about hyperspace lanes, and if they did, they'd hardly have the logistics to find them all and muster enough ships to blockade them (they struggle to mobilize 40 ships to combat a galactic threat). Nor do they have any method to reliably blockade hyperspace lanes anyway.

And non-hyperspace hyperdrive is still incredibly fast compared to most warp showings.

Could you go more in depths than a general refrence to the films? Off the top of my head be it the Diner Ben goes to ATOC, the moisture farm in ANH the "average joe" who owns droids does it in order to perform their job. Like a farmer owns a tractor and tilling machinery doesn't mean the entire population of America has one in their garage. Further you are making sweeping assumptions over the worlds which make up the Republic/Empire even through from what little we've seen of Dac or Kashyyyk such worlds don't have an over abundance of droids and both were members of the Old Republic. Then there's Naboo, Ryloth, and Toydaria none of which I remember being shown as a heavy droid dependent cultures.

Now I could be misremembering so what precisely are you basing the "droid:sapient " ratio as high.
Owen, a moisture farmer, could afford to buy two droids. Even if one in every one hundred people owned a droid (when a poor, backwater moisture farmer owned two), you get an incredibly high number of them.

Still, more than probably the human population in the galaxy.


I have done that but I am hardly an ally of Mike. That is giving me way to much credit considering the bulk of our interaction is him correcting one of my childish mistakes. The simple fact of hte matter is we don't all tow the same party line, we each have differnt ideas and thoughts on the matter and disagreement.
Good. No worry about 25,000 years with you then.

My point being that Star Wars has a very significantly higher population than Trek, its military forces are incalculably larger than Trek, and additionally it can mobilize troops and equipment far more rapidly, with a faster FTL and far more ships to spare.

And I am not doing the disparity justice here. The Germans lost WW2 largely, historians agree, because they faced 4:1 to 8:1 odds when it comes to industrial production. Here, the Federation faces thousands to one odds on industry, population and fleet size and you still think it can win.
You have not listed where this "quote" is coming from.
What, the trillions of crew quote? Really, it was quoted in the very post that started this mini-debate. Please actually read it.

In one source.
Who cares? It's still a canon statement.

And it's not just one source; the Essential Chronology quantifies the GAR as having hundreds of millions of divisions.
Conversely we know there were only trillions of people in the Old Republic from a G-canon source. The Outer Rim would have to be heavily populated, or massively conscripted, to make up the difference. Not absolutely incompatable but difficult to fit in with the G-cannon universe. Asking that you put the skullsweat into actually trying to fit the pieces togather is hardly a crime.
[/quote]

Precisely.

So we know that the Empire consists of trillions of naval crew, implying an absolutely enormous fleet size volumetrically comparable to billions of imperial star destroyers. Granted, most of these are probably random patrol ships designed to stop traffic violators, but the weight is still there.

Since the army corps has trillions, and the stormtroopers corp at its peak outnumbered both the army and navy corps, we can conclude that stormtroopers will outnumber the entire Federation human population. Even if stormtroopers were weaklings with sticks, they would still have the edge in a ground war. Mind you, stormtroopers, with exceptions, are incompetent (although none here admit that redshirts are so incompetent, their name has become an online meme), but the Red Army of conscripts would still easily overrun Poland.

Evidence to support my claim that Federation mobilization is piss slow (in comparison):

PICARD VO: Captain's Log: Stardate 46984.6 No additional Borg attacks have been reported in the past two days. However, Starfleet has dispatched Admiral Nechayev to take command in this sector in preparation for a possible Borg invasion [read: THREAT TO THE EXISTENCE OF FEDERATION].

NECHAYEV: There will be fifteen [compared to thousands at RotS Coruscant, dozens at AotC Geonosis] starships in this sector by the day after tomorrow [compared to hours in AotC and RotS]. The Gorkon will be my flagship. You'll have command of task force three, consisting of the Enterprise, the Crazy Horse and the Agamemnon.



Amazing Federation production capabilities!

SHELBY: We'll have the fleet back up in less than a year.


After losing 39 ships to a borg attack. 39 ships massing perhaps five imperial star destroyer, yet in 6 months (Shadows of the Empire) the Empire constructed in secrecy a half-complete Death Star.

Now of course, even if the Empire did completely bankrupt every credit and resource it had making it (which is patently false, since it would no longer be a secret by any stretch), it would still equate to a greater feat in production than the entire Alpha Quadrant could ever make in a century.

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:25 pm

MauriceWindows wrote:
mojo wrote:lucas says that the newest versions of the films always make up the canon, and in the blu-ray versions (which are of course the newest versions) both quotes still exist, one cannot supersede the other..
They're unchanged from their prior versions in this respect, therefore they're not "newer versions," and so my argument stands.
A newer edition is a newer edition. Period.
Even if there's only a 0.0001% change.
So when you compare stuff, it's latest edition OT and PT.

sonofccn
Starship Captain
Posts: 1657
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:23 pm
Location: Sol system, Earth,USA

Re: Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

Post by sonofccn » Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:25 pm

SWST wrote:You are indeed right. My apologies
Your apology would be best expressed by properly answering Mike's responses in the first place.
But then, upon looking at this, if Wars hyperdrive speeds were only 1 million C, it would have taken as long as a week to a month, depending on the size of the Wars galaxy, for Maul to travel to Tatooine. In reality, he did it in half a day.
The applicableness of this example and actual merit are beyond my interest and scope of my response. I was correcting a faulty response, I have no desire to argue hyperspeed yet again with you.
Yeah, "over 20,000c" is so damn impressive.
Considering its twenty times faster than Voyager should be capable of yes it is. Which goes back to my point the series itself doesn't support you because the series is all over the board on warp speed like it is everything else.
Picard talking about the Federation-Cardassian war:

PICARD: Evek, the last war caused massive destruction... took millions of lives. Don't send our two peoples back down that path... not like this. History is in your hands -- right now. Give us one last chance for peace.
This should be Journey's End season seven TNG. Not What you leave behind DS9 season 7 which you claimed previously to get evidence for millions being "devestating". Further the quote, spoken by Picard to try and persuad a Cardassion from picking another fight, doesn't mention the word devestation only massive destruction which claimed millions of lives. To destroy millions of lives would require massive destruction but I see nothing to indicate the Federation was unduly or taxingly injured from the combat. Unlike the Cardies for instance. Against your interpentation of the quote we have:
Yesterday's Enterprise Season 3 TNG wrote:GUINAN: Forty billion people have already died. This war's not supposed to be happening. You've got to send those people back to correct this
and
Statistical Probabilities DS9 season 6 wrote:BASHIR: If we fight, there will be over nine hundred billion casualties. If we surrender, no one dies. Either way we're in for five generations of Dominion rule
So I see no compelling reason a few million would be utterly devestating to the Federation save in the sense every life is precious which appears to be the sense Picard is using it in.
Because Lucas envisioned a galactic civilization?
No Lucas envisioned Flash Gordon. The same Lucas who had 200,000 clones and a million more well on their way in ATOC. The same who had an additional five million clones sometime into the Clonewars being a massive, major purchase. Who had the Seppies purchas 3 million additional battledroids.
But my point still stands, and that is that the Wars galaxy is simply fundamentally on a larger scale than Trek.
In regards to population yes its larger, I'm not sure this was challenged you posted your "point" in reply to Mike who was questioning your "few million dead is a devestating war" line. By any impartial measure this would be an errant and inconsquentail side argument to the one you were answering.
Arguably true, but it should not be enough to outpace 10,000 years of advancement.
Perhaps or perhaps not but that should be voiced between you and Mike. I was merely noted you missed half of his argument.
They ate our lunch, but they didn't squash us like insects.
By all accounts they could have if they wanted too. The difference between 21th century Vulcan and 21th century Earth could be accurately described like the Spanish Empire and the Aztec/Incan/ect meeting.
Implies that the vast majority of each race is concentrated in their home planet to the point of their entire species being syndectoted with their planet. Yet the Vulcan homeworld only has 5 billion or so inhabitants, and Earth hardly looks like Coruscant from our glimpses of it.
No. How you go from seven other world goverments charging a group of mercs to the majority of each race is concentrated on their home planet is beyond me. To round up we know Earth had colonies on Mars in the 22nd century, The Vulcans had a monastary on Pjem, The Vulcans and the Andorians had territorial disupte over the conlony Weytahn etc. By the 23rd century the Federation, if not humanity, is on a thousand worlds and in the 24th century we see worlds still being terraformed for colonization and more colonists settling fresh virgin worlds.

As to their actual population our best marker is that they can take 900 billion dead and come back from that. Which is a very loose marker I agree but it is our best one we have.
Therefore, it is highly likely that the trillions of officers and trillions of army corps in the Empire outnumber the population of the Alpha Quadrant.
We don't know the population of the alpha quadrant. Hell we don't know the population of one political entity inside the Alpha Quadrant with anything regarding certainty. I've previously showed you the world Gideon as an extreme example of the wild cards the galaxy holds. To be blunt we don't know and trying to claim otherwise is an exercise in futility.
No, you won't, or else the Enterprise would have been retired long ago.
Your confusing charting with exploration and its canon taking from canon sources that have never been contridicted. So not only are you wrong about 11% being charted you are wrong in the extreme missing the stupendous charting the Federation is undertaking.
But I hardly see how this is going to matter
You brought it up SWST.
because the war certainly won't take decades anyway if the imperial army outnumbers the Federation civilian population.
Concetrating solely on charting it does matter because the Federation will finish mapping the Star Wars galaxy long before the Empire finishes mapping the Federation. And without charting, without hyperspace routes your fleet, your armies are not going anywhere.
Obi Wan trusted her more than any other in the galaxy when it comes to coordinates and mapping (AOTC novel).
So? What we have is her opinion in an off the cuff remark which in actual fact turned out to be wrong. That is a very weak bridge to try and argue off of that the entire Star Wars galaxy is mapped.
Who gives a flying damn?
You do. You claimed the Star Wars galaxy is completely mapped. As evidence you presented a Jedi saying if it isn't in her database it doesn't exist which in turn was proven to be wrong. I raised a T-canon example that the freaking Core systems have not been as throughly charted that a massive hyperlane can exist. A lane of such import both the Seppies and the Republic are drooling to obtain it.
And non-hyperspace hyperdrive is still incredibly fast compared to most warp showings.
I am going to ask what you mean by non-hyperspace hyperdrives, ask for evidence it doens't require charted lanes, and an actual speed example.
Owen, a moisture farmer, could afford to buy two droids
Read back, he's a farmer that is like buying a tractor. It doesn't mean the bulk of the population is buying one.
Even if one in every one hundred people owned a droid (when a poor, backwater moisture farmer owned two), you get an incredibly high number of them.
And then I would ask to see what evidence you are basing one in a hundred people owning a droid. The point is we don't know the droid population, or the number of people who buy droids, so it falls to you to make your case on why you feel a number is justified.
What, the trillions of crew quote? Really, it was quoted in the very post that started this mini-debate. Please actually read it.
I did you don't state where this quote is coming from. Book, page number that sort of thing. Through looking back its tens of trillion for the regular army which is high, in addition with stormtroopers supposedly having more men, for an Empire which spun off from a Republic of no more than 9 trillion. Which would be another reason to look on at the 300 trillion number previously cited with some suspicion.
Who cares? It's still a canon statement.
One among others of equal or higher canon.
the Essential Chronology quantifies the GAR as having hundreds of millions of divisions.
The GAR, fought predomiantly with Clones, is severely curtailed in number at the highest levels of canon. However as a source you are entitled to bring it up, of which you had not previously as far as can be determined in this mini-debate, along with the revelant quote/page number etc.
So we know that the Empire consists of trillions of naval crew, implying an absolutely enormous fleet size volumetrically comparable to billions of imperial star destroyers.
It is immaterial what it "implies" we have C-canon stating quite directly what the entire navy posses post Yavin. Thousands of sector groups each with at least 24 Star Destroyers and IIRC 1600 combat vessels running from heavy cruiser down to patrol ships. That doesn't equal billions of ISDs. Now if this book states the crews are actually serving aboard starships, whatever book this is, than we would then have a contridiction but until then ship numbers are well established.

Second the quote is more unworkable with G-canon than I previously understood, we are talking about more people under uniform than the population of the Old Republic two or three times over, which would require serious jury-rigging and explanation to explain the raw population needed to draft. Discounting any anti-alien sentiment of course that might prevent the bulk of the galaxy from serving the Empire. Work you haven't done yet.
There will be fifteen [compared to thousands at RotS Coruscant, dozens at AotC Geonosis]
Sigh.
ENDGAME season 7 Voyager wrote:[Starfleet Command]

ADMIRAL PARIS: What the hell is it?
BARCLAY: A transwarp aperture. It's less than a light year from Earth.
OFFICER: How many Borg vessels?
BARCLAY: We can't get a clear reading, but the graviton emissions are off the scale.
ADMIRAL PARIS: I want every ship in range to converge on those co-ordinates now.
CREWWOMAN: Yes, sir.

[Bridge]

(a sphere is chasing Voyager, firing constantly)
TUVOK: Aft armour is down to six percent.
KIM: Hull breaches on decks six through twelve.
PARIS: I can't stay ahead of them, Captain.
TUVOK: The armour is failing.
CHAKOTAY: Where's the nearest aperture?
SEVEN: Approximately thirty seconds ahead, but it leads back to the Delta quadrant.
JANEWAY: Mister Paris, prepare to adjust your heading.
PARIS: Yes, ma'am.

[Starfleet Command]

OFFICER: We've got eighteen ships in position, Nine more on the way
So post dominion war Federation can have eighteen ships in bascily five minutes from a surprise attack. Your BOBW quote refers to an era of peace with the fleet likely doing starfleet's duty of exploring space which is quite vast. The Federation spreads across 8,000 lightyears by itself and ships like the Enterprise are frequently pushing beyond the frontier.

Now as to your examples ROTS involves a Republic knee deep in a heavy war far more comparable to the Endgame example than BOBW. As to AOTCs that involved a military force with no comitments, no dispersal across the galaxy, who were in a readied state, the Jedi were supposed to have already picked up their "units" already, merely waiting the go command. It is incomparable to a fleet which has to defend the breadth of its political state's territory, is involved with exploration, colonization and humanitarian type missions.
Justice season 1 TNG wrote:Captain's log, stardate 41255.6. After delivering a party of Earth colonists to the Strnad solar system, we have discovered another Class M planet in the adjoining Rubicun star system.
Colonization
Deja Q season 3 TNG wrote:Captain's log, Stardate 43539.1. We have moved into orbit around Bre'el Four. With the assistance of the planet's emergency control centre, we're investigating a potentially catastrophic threat to the population from a descending asteroidal moon.
Humanitarian mission
Obession season 2 TOS wrote:MCCOY: Jim, the Yorktown's ship surgeon will want to know how late. Those vaccines he's transferring to us are highly perishable.
SPOCK [on monitor]: Spock again, Captain. Those medical supplies are badly needed on planet Theta Seven. They are expecting us to get them there on time.
Humanitarian missing/emergency freightor
Amazing Federation production capabilities!

SHELBY: We'll have the fleet back up in less than a year.


After losing 39 ships to a borg attack. 39 ships massing perhaps five imperial star destroyer, yet in 6 months (Shadows of the Empire) the Empire constructed in secrecy a half-complete Death Star.
39 ships in peace time, yet sustained repeated losses numbering in the hundreds during the dominon war and was expected too lose "thousands" taking Cardassia Prime.

And you may actual bring the revelant information from Shadow of the Empire if you wish to make the claim the Empire fabricated the DSII in six months, which is quite odd since it took 20 years to get the DSI operational.

sonofccn
Starship Captain
Posts: 1657
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:23 pm
Location: Sol system, Earth,USA

Re: Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

Post by sonofccn » Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:52 pm

Mike DiCenso wrote:I'd agree with you, but Lucas is the ultimate retconner, and he penned in 1,000 years for the Republic, not 1,000 generations, which is what he had Obi-Wan say in ANH. That did cause a massive EU shuffle, but the EU C-canon is a low canon now. The EU claiming some reformation thing does not jive with what Palpatine and others in the PT have said.
I understand sir and if it was just an EU construct I would agree with you completely. Its just that we have a contridiction between two G-canon sources, one that it tries to fix and if EU is allowed I don't think there is sufficent grounds to dismiss its attempted explanation. Not to be argumenative of course sir, just how I see the thing.

And of course I didn't mean to imply that any arguments SWST made from this point had any merit. If I did that was purely accidental.

Picard
Starship Captain
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: Challenge: Invade the Star Wars galaxy

Post by Picard » Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:04 pm

39 ships in peace time, yet sustained repeated losses numbering in the hundreds during the dominon war and was expected too lose "thousands" taking Cardassia Prime.
I don't remember "thousands"... do you have a quote?

Post Reply