The 1.5 megaton myth

For polite and reasoned discussion of Star Wars and/or Star Trek.
Post Reply
Picard
Starship Captain
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: The 1.5 megaton myth

Post by Picard » Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:41 pm

StarWarsStraTrek wrote:Just because we can't physically see the asteroids does not mean that they do not exist.
What, asteroids made from duraglass? Or duravacuum, which takes 5x10e398728 J to vaporize?

< /sarcasm>

Maybe if those asteroids are simply too small to see, but that doesn't help you either, considering that vaping centimeter-wide asteroids is not really a feat...
Your argument [or, shall I say, Darkstar's argument] that only heavy turbolaser bolts could have been visible from the rooftops of Coruscant is in complete contradiction with the stated fact that starfighters were visible as gnats from said Coruscanti rooftops.
Except that starfighters are also large, far larger than light TL bolts, and it wasn't starfighters themselves that were visible, but rather their engine exhaust... which is completely different thing.
At the worst, you can argue that the quote is invalid. However, G canon evidence must follow far stricter standards than evidence from the EU; since we have no idea how high up these rooftops were, nor how clear Coruscant's atmosphere is, there is no conclusive contradiction to warrant discarding.
Except for what we see in movie.
3. Heavy turbolasers have rates of fire estimated at between two shots per second to one shot per two seconds. How could this form an "infinite lattice" of light filling the entire night sky?
Except that Republic artillery walkers (SPHAT in EU) have been described as turbolasers... and their effects are beams, thus being far better suited to create such effect. Which brings us an interesting twist, considering that these "turbolasers" are in single-digit kilotons:
http://picard578.hostoi.com/startrek-vs ... ublic.html

And if we go by movies, they are heaviest ship-to-ship weapons avaliable to Republic destroyers.

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: The 1.5 megaton myth

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:53 pm

Picard wrote: What, asteroids made from duraglass? Or duravacuum, which takes 5x10e398728 J to vaporize?

< /sarcasm>

Maybe if those asteroids are simply too small to see, but that doesn't help you either, considering that vaping centimeter-wide asteroids is not really a feat...
We don't see the asteroid initially; this is not impossible. After being lit up, however, we physically see pieces of matter heating and dispersing in essentially the exact same manner as other visible asteroids were witnessed being vaporized. It is completely consistent with asteroid vaporization effects earlier witnessed.

Meanwhile, the effects, as I explained last page, are completely inconsistent with any and all depictions of flak bursts or shield effects.
Except that starfighters are also large, far larger than light TL bolts, and it wasn't starfighters themselves that were visible, but rather their engine exhaust... which is completely different thing.
No, they really aren't. Starfighters are longer, but certainly not by such a margin that one can conclusively discount the possibility that the turbolasers described with light.


Except for what we see in movie.
Then I would question why you use this quotation as your primary turbolaser firepower calculation in your blog.


Except that Republic artillery walkers (SPHAT in EU) have been described as turbolasers...
In the EU, yes. I don't recall them [although I may be wrong] being described as such in primary canon, and I don't recall you accepting the EU at all.
and their effects are beams, thus being far better suited to create such effect.
What; so every capital ship mounted SPHATs on their hulls now? We can clearly observe that ship mounted turbolasers look different than SPHAT beams, for whatever reason; these are turbolasers emanating from ships, and thus, whether or not SPHAT beams would have created such an effect is irrelevant.
Which brings us an interesting twist, considering that these "turbolasers" are in single-digit kilotons:
http://picard578.hostoi.com/startrek-vs ... ublic.html
I don't want to hurt your feelings, but your calculations are crap.

1. You assume that the core ships had no deflector shielding.
2. You assume a one meter thick hull with a grand total of zero evidence whatsoever.
3. You assume that the hull is made out of conventional steel for no reason whatsoever, even though if SW military vessels were made out of conventional steel, the Death Star would have literally imploded on itself the instant its engines accelerated at one meter per second. Mind you, the movie novelizations specifically mention the existence of "durasteel" and orbital mirrors; the latter of which would require substances far stronger than modern steel.
4. You assume that the beam shots vaporized the hull and then stopped; that this was the limit of their firepower, rather than a minimum value, and you have no idea whether or not they could have vaporized more.

Really, your calculation proves exactly jack and shit. You also seem to ignore this instance of SPHAT firepower:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKWt0485uc4

@2:34, a SPHAT inside a hanger one-shots an enemy vessel, making in one shot a gaping hole far larger than ten meters and far thicker than one meter. Why don't you try calculating that first?
And if we go by movies, they are heaviest ship-to-ship weapons avaliable to Republic destroyers.
Too bad that your calculation, with nothing personal intended, is the worst and most ridiculous that I've seen in a very, very long time, and makes a crapload of ridiculous assumptions for absolutely jack and shit reasons.

You could try calculating the vaporization of a star destroyer in a single hit by a turbolaser in RotJ (IIRC, it is in the backdrop while Ackbar is responding to Lando's suggestion to engage those star destroyers at point blank range), or just calculate reactor power based on the circumnavigation of Endor or any of the various other acceleration feats instead to estimate reactor power, and then extrapolate firepower yields from that.

Picard
Starship Captain
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: The 1.5 megaton myth

Post by Picard » Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:35 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:We don't see the asteroid initially; this is not impossible. After being lit up, however, we physically see pieces of matter heating and dispersing in essentially the exact same manner as other visible asteroids were witnessed being vaporized. It is completely consistent with asteroid vaporization effects earlier witnessed.
There is one scene in which we see asteroids even before being fired upon, and which gives high single digit or low double digit kilotons for Imperial turbolasers - if we disregard asteroids being quite explosive on their own - and another where there are no asteroids but rather just flak bursts.
Then I would question why you use this quotation as your primary turbolaser firepower calculation in your blog.
Because it is only avaliable thing we have about heavy turbolasers. Unless you want toassume that firepower scales by volume, which would be questionable at least.
What; so every capital ship mounted SPHATs on their hulls now?
Republic Star Destroyers did mount it; watch RotS opening scene.
We can clearly observe that ship mounted turbolasers look different than SPHAT beams, for whatever reason; these are turbolasers emanating from ships, and thus, whether or not SPHAT beams would have created such an effect is irrelevant.
Meaning that we're back at explosive asteroids and sub-ton cannons being used by Republic destroyers for ship-to-ship combat, and no shields of any kind.

But SPHAT (for lack of better name) had shown low kiloton effects in AotC.
You assume that the core ships had no deflector shielding.
I did calculation based on effect of weapon on material. It has nothing to do with shields.
You assume a one meter thick hull with a grand total of zero evidence whatsoever
Because it is most that can be concluded from screenshot.
You assume that the hull is made out of conventional steel for no reason whatsoever, even though if SW military vessels were made out of conventional steel, the Death Star would have literally imploded on itself the instant its engines accelerated at one meter per second. Mind you, the movie novelizations specifically mention the existence of "durasteel" and orbital mirrors; the latter of which would require substances far stronger than modern steel.
Except that mechanical strength has nothing to do with heat capacity, and we know that latter is comparable to modern steel from RotS novelization.
You assume that the beam shots vaporized the hull and then stopped; that this was the limit of their firepower, rather than a minimum value, and you have no idea whether or not they could have vaporized more.
Hull forms majority of resistance to effect.
SPHAT inside a hanger one-shots an enemy vessel, making in one shot a gaping hole far larger than ten meters and far thicker than one meter. Why don't you try calculating that first?
Except we don't know wether it was inside hangar or linked to SD's power systems. And I don't see any hole until Separatist warship explodes from inside.
You could try calculating the vaporization of a star destroyer in a single hit by a turbolaser in RotJ
Which is reactor explosion and has nothing to do with turbolaser firepower.
just calculate reactor power based on the circumnavigation of Endor
Which we don't see in movie - novelization's scene is full of mistakes, and can't be relied on.
any of the various other acceleration feats instead to estimate reactor power, and then extrapolate firepower yields from that.
Star Wars acceleration - Millenium Falcon and ISD's in TESB immediately come to mind - is nothing special.

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: The 1.5 megaton myth

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:44 pm

Picard wrote:
There is one scene in which we see asteroids even before being fired upon, and which gives high single digit or low double digit kilotons for Imperial turbolasers - if we disregard asteroids being quite explosive on their own -
Bullshit. You are confusing upper limits with lower limits. If a sniper rifle easily shatters a glass bottle, nobody would attempt to calculate an upper limit to its strength based on this, because nothing indicates that it reached its penetrative limit.
and another where there are no asteroids but rather just flak bursts.
THIS IS EXACTLY THE SCENE THAT I AM TALKING ABOUT. Please do spend more time reading the quote in question first; my entire point is that the "flak bursts" could not have been flak bursts, because they are completely inconsistent with known burst effects, but strangely fit perfectly with known asteroid vaporization effects.

Because it is only avaliable thing we have about heavy turbolasers. Unless you want toassume that firepower scales by volume, which would be questionable at least.
I could mention the flaw in your logic here; but anyhow, fair enough. If you are going to calc this quote, then I have every right to as well. Please, do not hypocritically discredit its validity, and then use it anyway, while discrediting my use of the source as well.
Republic Star Destroyers did mount it; watch RotS opening scene.
Oooh. So in the entire opening scene, we see a SPHAT beam once, and you conclude that there were enough of them to form an "infinite lattice" in the sky visible from Coruscant rooftops now?

Meaning that we're back at explosive asteroids and sub-ton cannons being used by Republic destroyers for ship-to-ship combat, and no shields of any kind.
Except that you have no provided a fraction of a shred of proof for your "sub-ton canons", given that such turbolasers would have been weaker than the 'maximum firepower' blasts fired by an AT-AT in ESB.

And now you are beginning to truly state things for no reason at all. "No shields of any kind"? ROFLAMO. Did you watch TPM, when R2's character is introduced to repair a shield generator, on a yacht that was explicitly stated to not have been a warship? Or how the TF battleship was explicitly stated to have had a shield generator?

Or how star destroyers visibly flashed white upon being hit, consistent with shield effects observed on the Falcon and other ships, and how various quotations explicitly mention the existence of shield generators?

I mean, Picard, where the fuck did you get the idea to claim that star destroyers don't have shields?
I did calculation based on effect of weapon on material. It has nothing to do with shields.
Sure it did. The shields would have dampened the power of the beams.
Because it is most that can be concluded from screenshot.
Please, feel free to elaborate.

Except that mechanical strength has nothing to do with heat capacity, and we know that latter is comparable to modern steel from RotS novelization.
Except that said makeshift base was designed to self destruct by falling into the lava, and that making it with durasteel heat-resistant enough to not self destruct upon collapsing into said lava would be completely counter-productive, wouldn't it?

Meanwhile, with standard structural steel, the hull of the Executor would have been vaporized when it engaged e22+W of reactor power to accelerate around Endor, and Qui Gon certainly would not have struggled to cut open a blast door.

Hull forms majority of resistance to effect.
Which doesn't address my point to the slightest. Being able to do X does not mean that X is the limit of its capabilities.
Except we don't know wether it was inside hangar or linked to SD's power systems.
Irrelevant, since an SD's firepower is precisely what we are talking about here.
And I don't see any hole until Separatist warship explodes from inside.
Explodes from what? What source aboard could possibly have been volatile enough to destroy a kilometer long warship?

Which is reactor explosion and has nothing to do with turbolaser firepower.
So you are conceding that Wars ships do not utilize nuclear fusion or fission, which use completely separate isotopes for reactors than they do for bombs, and thus do not explode upon being hit, and cannot explode, even if you want them to?

Which we don't see in movie -
Bullshit. The Emperor orders Vader to move the fleet behind Endor. When the Rebels arrive, we don't see the fleet; Ackbar turns around, and we see the fleet. This isn't that difficult to deduce, that the fleet moved.
novelization's scene is full of mistakes, and can't be relied on.
Because you say so? Elaborate.

Star Wars acceleration - Millenium Falcon and ISD's in TESB immediately come to mind - is nothing special.
Really?

Dooku's sailboat lifts off. Padme and some clone troopers fire at it for a few seconds. Dooku's assistant pushes the throttle forward; in the next scene cut, they are already well past Geonosis's rings. Then, the camera jumps back to our protagonists, and it is only now that Yoda picks up his cane, and an extremely concerned Padme rushes in to check on Anakin and Obi Wan. No more than 10 to 20 seconds could have transpired; and yet Dooku's ship already passed orbit! The acceleration seen here is as high as 20,000 G's, translating to around e22 watts for an ISD to perform a similar feat.

Additionally, in ANH during the Battle of Yavin, we witness the X wings passing by half of Yavin IV, a gas giant, in a single shot of around six seconds.

Picard
Starship Captain
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: The 1.5 megaton myth

Post by Picard » Thu Apr 19, 2012 2:23 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:Bullshit. You are confusing upper limits with lower limits. If a sniper rifle easily shatters a glass bottle, nobody would attempt to calculate an upper limit to its strength based on this, because nothing indicates that it reached its penetrative limit.
If it is only thing avaliable, we go by it.

Of course, I could always go by prequel trilogy, which would put heavy, not medium, turbolasers at single-digit kilotons, high end.
Please do spend more time reading the quote in question first; my entire point is that the "flak bursts" could not have been flak bursts, because they are completely inconsistent with known burst effects, but strangely fit perfectly with known asteroid vaporization effects.
Except there are no asteroids at all in that scene.
I could mention the flaw in your logic here; but anyhow, fair enough. If you are going to calc this quote, then I have every right to as well. Please, do not hypocritically discredit its validity, and then use it anyway, while discrediting my use of the source as well.
You are using part of quote which directly contradicts movie. I simply went for highest logically possible value, even thought movie contradicts it.
Oooh. So in the entire opening scene, we see a SPHAT beam once, and you conclude that there were enough of them to form an "infinite lattice" in the sky visible from Coruscant rooftops now?
No, I simply disregard "infinite lattice" part, since it is seen nowhere in movies. But fact is that these cannons, capable of single-digit kilotons in AotC, are shown shooting down Separatists' destroyers in single shots, while all other weapons shown are sub-kiloton.
Except that you have no provided a fraction of a shred of proof for your "sub-ton canons", given that such turbolasers would have been weaker than the 'maximum firepower' blasts fired by an AT-AT in ESB.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKWt0485uc4
And now you are beginning to truly state things for no reason at all. "No shields of any kind"? ROFLAMO. Did you watch TPM, when R2's character is introduced to repair a shield generator, on a yacht that was explicitly stated to not have been a warship? Or how the TF battleship was explicitly stated to have had a shield generator?
Yes, but unless you want to admit that event >dialogue > visuals, point stands. Funnily, on SpaceBattles, you and other Warsies like to go visuals > dialogue, except when it suits them.
Or how star destroyers visibly flashed white upon being hit, consistent with shield effects observed on the Falcon and other ships, and how various quotations explicitly mention the existence of shield generators?

I mean, Picard, where the fuck did you get the idea to claim that star destroyers don't have shields?
RotS visuals.
Sure it did. The shields would have dampened the power of the beams.
Shields would have to be completely down in order for beam to hit hull.
Please, feel free to elaborate.
Take a look at screenshot. Do you see any hull?
Except that said makeshift base was designed to self destruct by falling into the lava, and that making it with durasteel heat-resistant enough to not self destruct upon collapsing into said lava would be completely counter-productive, wouldn't it?
Evidence?
Meanwhile, with standard structural steel, the hull of the Executor would have been vaporized when it engaged e22+W of reactor power to accelerate around Endor, and Qui Gon certainly would not have struggled to cut open a blast door.
Unless they use mass lightening... or made a hyperspace jump.
Which doesn't address my point to the slightest. Being able to do X does not mean that X is the limit of its capabilities.
Except that ISD's get destroyed by asteroid field, and barrage of sub-kiloton shots is perfectly enough to bring down a cruiser in RotS.
Explodes from what? What source aboard could possibly have been volatile enough to destroy a kilometer long warship?
Fuel vapor. Explosives. Reactor overload.
So you are conceding that Wars ships do not utilize nuclear fusion or fission, which use completely separate isotopes for reactors than they do for bombs, and thus do not explode upon being hit, and cannot explode, even if you want them to?
Badly designed fusion reactors can explode.
Bullshit. The Emperor orders Vader to move the fleet behind Endor. When the Rebels arrive, we don't see the fleet; Ackbar turns around, and we see the fleet. This isn't that difficult to deduce, that the fleet moved.
How? Hyperspace jump? Or did it move during the Rebels' fleet transit?
Because you say so? Elaborate.
For one, Imperial fleet in movie is in one group, and noone mentions fleet moving from behind Endor.
Dooku's sailboat lifts off. Padme and some clone troopers fire at it for a few seconds. Dooku's assistant pushes the throttle forward; in the next scene cut, they are already well past Geonosis's rings. Then, the camera jumps back to our protagonists, and it is only now that Yoda picks up his cane, and an extremely concerned Padme rushes in to check on Anakin and Obi Wan. No more than 10 to 20 seconds could have transpired; and yet Dooku's ship already passed orbit! The acceleration seen here is as high as 20,000 G's, translating to around e22 watts for an ISD to perform a similar feat.
You have no evidence of amount of time passing between cutscenes.

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: The 1.5 megaton myth

Post by Praeothmin » Thu Apr 19, 2012 3:00 pm

Picard wrote:You have no evidence of amount of time passing between cutscenes.
Actually, we have a very good idea of the amount of time passed between those two events...
Dooku escapes after injuring Obi and Anni and before getting his ass handed to him by Yoda...
He boards his ship, then exits the cave, and is shot at by Padme...
We then see Dooku in space before Padme can rejoin Obi and Annie, and before Yoda even picks up the cane he dropped for the fight...

Thus, we cannot, in any way, infer hours, or even many, many minutes...

At most, I'd agree with maybe a few minutes to allow for Yoda to recover from his effort, and for Padme to cover the distance from her shooting location to the cave where the fight happened, but even then I feel it's pushing it, and I have no issue accepting 11 seconds either...

Picard
Starship Captain
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: The 1.5 megaton myth

Post by Picard » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:46 pm

So, what would that acceleration be? 2 000 m/s^2? (It could be 5 000 000 m/s^2, but that would utterly fly into face of everything we've seen in rest of movies).

Of course, if Star Destroyers could do that, we would not have near-collision in TESB, or that collision Darkstar analyzed from TCW, nor would Rebel fleet haul its collective ass slowly towards Imperial one...

That is why I prefer explanation of short hyperspace jumps. Of course, it could always be that Star Wars ships can do it, but for some reason, not in combat. Structural fields, maybe, or smaller ships are simply more capable of greater accelerations?

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: The 1.5 megaton myth

Post by Praeothmin » Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:07 pm

I don't mind the short Hyperspace jump in RotJ, but not for the AotC example...

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: The 1.5 megaton myth

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:44 pm

Picard wrote:
If it is only thing avaliable, we go by it.
1. It is not.

2. Your methodology is horrible. If it were the only thing available, then we would conclude a lower limit, and admit that we have no way of knowing the upper limit to turbolaser firepower. A PIECE OF EVIDENCE BEING THE ONLY THING AVAILABLE DOES NOT MAKE IT AN UPPER LIMIT! Any credible scientist would tell you this; any credible historian would tell you this. Your constant use of Appeal to Ignorance has been beaten down before, why is it so difficult to understand for you?

...my god. This is just horrible, horrible stuff. Could you imagine the persecution that admits his evidence is circumstantial, but suggests that they still use it to convict the defendant because it is all that they have available?
Of course, I could always go by prequel trilogy, which would put heavy, not medium, turbolasers at single-digit kilotons, high end.
I would love to see your calcs on this.


Except there are no asteroids at all in that scene.
I already addressed this. Please, actually read all that I write.

You are using part of quote which directly contradicts movie. I simply went for highest logically possible value, even thought movie contradicts it.
Wait...so you are admitting that your calculation is incorrect?

My god.

No, I simply disregard "infinite lattice" part, since it is seen nowhere in movies.
More bullshit methodology. Nobody said that the novel quote is in the same time-frame as the scene in the film. And cherry picking a quote apart like this is heavily unreliable as well.
But fact is that these cannons, capable of single-digit kilotons in AotC,
Capable of single-digit kilotons =/= incapable of megatons/gigatons.
Explosions in space is hardly what I expected from you.


Yes, but unless you want to admit that event >dialogue > visuals, point stands. Funnily, on SpaceBattles, you and other Warsies like to go visuals > dialogue, except when it suits them.
That's because we analyze both universes with a scientific mindset. Analyzing by dialogue first is a literary mindset.

And don't go around accusing others of double standards in this regard; the entire backbone of the original superlaser effect theory is based on the nitpicking of SFX visuals!

RotS visuals.
Because you ignore the very blatant visual shield effects in the OT, just because.
Shields would have to be completely down in order for beam to hit hull.
Whaaa...

Or the beam penetrated the fucking shields, and THEN when into the hull!

Take a look at screenshot. Do you see any hull?
It is impossible to tell. Feel free to post the screenshot here, and analyze the thickness of the hull.
Evidence?
Did you watch the movie? Anakin and Obi Wan accidentally trigger the station's self-destruct mechanism. Its method of suicide; falling into the lava. Now if they used starship grade durasteel to do this, then...the contingency would have failed, wouldn't it?
Unless they use mass lightening... or made a hyperspace jump.
Nah. By your own [terrible] review of SW engine power, they are already 100 tons, which would be enough to heavily damage structural steel.

Mind you, your methedology is, once again, atrocious. You use the engine power witnessed WHILE TAKING OFF, AWAY FROM COMBAT, NEXT TO FRIENDLY TROOPS, FOR A PARADE to establish an upper limit on engine power, while only vaguely explaining your logic here, and then proceed to arbitrarily assign combat power.

Meanwhile, can I pull a random video of the Enterprise moving slowly in a non-combat situation, and conclude that it can only generate 100 kilowatts of engine power now?

Except that ISD's get destroyed by asteroid field,
You mean the asteroid that was described as impacting its hull? Come on.
and barrage of sub-kiloton shots is perfectly enough to bring down a cruiser in RotS.
Except that no shields were up.
Fuel vapor.
...do you have any idea how ridiculously strong this "fuel vapor" would have to have been?

Besides, the beam struck the center of the ship, not where you would expect fuel to be stored.
Explosives.
And why did this ship have several megatons of volatile explosives on board?

And where is your evidence supporting this?
Reactor overload.
Wrong. Fusion reactors do. Not. Explode. Unless if you want to concede that they are hypermatter. That would be fun.

Badly designed fusion reactors can explode.
Ok, now I get the impression that you are lying through your teeth. But please, link us all to a scientific document supporting your claim.


How? Hyperspace jump? Or did it move during the Rebels' fleet transit?
Dude, I've provided the quote at least five times to you be now.


For one, Imperial fleet in movie is in one group,
Yeah, they flew out from behind Endor on both sides, and then decided to group together. It's not that difficult to piece together.
and noone mentions fleet moving from behind Endor.
...

Palpatine orders the fleet behind Endor; then, they are in front of Endor. It does not take a whole lot of thought for one to deduce that they...gasp...moved out from behind Endor!

And besides, the movie doesn't have to say that they did; the novel does, and it is canon, so long as there is no clear and blatant contradiction between the two.

You have no evidence of amount of time passing between cutscenes.
Yes, I do. But somebody else presented it to you above.

Picard
Starship Captain
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: The 1.5 megaton myth

Post by Picard » Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:08 am

Praeothmin wrote:I don't mind the short Hyperspace jump in RotJ, but not for the AotC example...
Yeah... I was talking about RotJ.
StarWarsStarTrek wrote:1. It is not.

2. Your methodology is horrible. If it were the only thing available, then we would conclude a lower limit, and admit that we have no way of knowing the upper limit to turbolaser firepower. A PIECE OF EVIDENCE BEING THE ONLY THING AVAILABLE DOES NOT MAKE IT AN UPPER LIMIT! Any credible scientist would tell you this; any credible historian would tell you this. Your constant use of Appeal to Ignorance has been beaten down before, why is it so difficult to understand for you?

...my god. This is just horrible, horrible stuff. Could you imagine the persecution that admits his evidence is circumstantial, but suggests that they still use it to convict the defendant because it is all that they have available?
As I have said, we have several pieces of evidence avaliable:
1) AotC/RotS combo, where we see lots of sub-kiloton shots, and kiloton-level weapons bringing down starships in single shots
2) RotS novel, which suggests heavy weapons in single-digit megatons
3) TESB, where we see ISD using kiloton-level shots from its medium turbolasers
I would love to see your calcs on this.
You already have. I hope.
Wait...so you are admitting that your calculation is incorrect?

My god.
It is not incorrect if we take only novel into account. But as I said, in RotS ships go down to single kiloton-level shots or barrages of subkiloton shots.
More bullshit methodology. Nobody said that the novel quote is in the same time-frame as the scene in the film. And cherry picking a quote apart like this is heavily unreliable as well.
Meaning we're back to kilotons.

Besides:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latticework

That is effect I would have expected heavy walker's guns to creaate, in sufficient quantity.
Capable of single-digit kilotons =/= incapable of megatons/gigatons.
Battle was in atmosphere, yet we don't see anything to suggest even kilotons from any other weapons.
Explosions in space is hardly what I expected from you.
Stop bullshitting. Battle was in atmosphere.
That's because we analyze both universes with a scientific mindset. Analyzing by dialogue first is a literary mindset.
Which is funny, considering how writers write universe with literary mindset, and with many VFX guys not giving a crap about physics.
And don't go around accusing others of double standards in this regard; the entire backbone of the original superlaser effect theory is based on the nitpicking of SFX visuals!
And on description from novel.

Unless you want to point out where exactly we have dialogue describing how superlaser works, of course...
Because you ignore the very blatant visual shield effects in the OT, just because.
Where? Even OT did not have shield effects, as far as my memory serves me.
Or the beam penetrated the fucking shields, and THEN when into the hull!
Shields do not have impact on rate at which beam penetrates hull itself. Because, you know, by that point shields are nonexistent.
It is impossible to tell. Feel free to post the screenshot here, and analyze the thickness of the hull.
I don't have one. But from what I remember from the movie, we clearly saw beams from walkers penetrating the hull...yet hull itself was barely visible, so it could not have been thicker than beam. Which itself is 50-some centimeters thick at most.
Did you watch the movie? Anakin and Obi Wan accidentally trigger the station's self-destruct mechanism. Its method of suicide; falling into the lava. Now if they used starship grade durasteel to do this, then...the contingency would have failed, wouldn't it?
They don't. What we see is protective fields shutting down due to their lightsaber work, and station falling due to patches of lava falling on it.
Nah. By your own [terrible] review of SW engine power, they are already 100 tons, which would be enough to heavily damage structural steel.

Mind you, your methedology is, once again, atrocious. You use the engine power witnessed WHILE TAKING OFF, AWAY FROM COMBAT, NEXT TO FRIENDLY TROOPS, FOR A PARADE to establish an upper limit on engine power, while only vaguely explaining your logic here, and then proceed to arbitrarily assign combat power.
Except I did NOT use it as an upper limit. What I used as upper limit was RotJ combat.
You mean the asteroid that was described as impacting its hull? Come on.
So we have asteroids that can easily penetrate ISD's shields? So, by your logic, ISD's shields are incapable of stopping kinetic impacts; phasers are partly kinetic weapons, therefore ISD's shields would be incapable of fully stopping phasers.
Except that no shields were up.
Considering that we don't see shields during entire movie, and fact that there are some highly flammable asteroids in TESB, as well as fighters being shown as danger for subsystems during entire movie, we could make a case for no shields at all. Of course, that would require us to ignore the "our shields are down... AAAARGH!" part in RotJ space battle and comment of Mister "nothing can penetrate our shield" during TPM.
And why did this ship have several megatons of volatile explosives on board?

And where is your evidence supporting this?
Maybe ammo? We see shells being used for heavy cannons of TF cruiser.

As for evidence:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoN3mZQds7k
55 seconds
Wrong. Fusion reactors do. Not. Explode. Unless if you want to concede that they are hypermatter. That would be fun.
They do in Sci Fi.
Memory Alpha wrote:The self-destruct sequence of DS9 involves the computer ordering the station's main fusion reactor to disengage the reaction stabilizers, causing the reactor to overload, and the station to destroy itself. (DS9: "Civil Defense")
Also, it would be imaginable that high-power fusion reactor using fuel as coolant could explode due to coolant leak into reactor itself. Of course, most reactors would simply shut down, but Star Wars is insanely unconcerned with safety.

Ok, now I get the impression that you are lying through your teeth. But please, link us all to a scientific document supporting your claim.

As above.
Dude, I've provided the quote at least five times to you be now.
Which is in direct contradiction with movie.
Yeah, they flew out from behind Endor on both sides, and then decided to group together. It's not that difficult to piece together.
It throws your argument into water.

We don't see Imperial ships flying near Rebel ships to group with other part. If they did it, they should have done it during Rebel fleet's transit. Meaning that other group may also have positioned itself where it did during transit... not impossible, considering Palpatine may have known when Rebel Fleet was about to jump.
Palpatine orders the fleet behind Endor; then, they are in front of Endor. It does not take a whole lot of thought for one to deduce that they...gasp...moved out from behind Endor!
Yes they did. BUT we don't know WHEN they did it... you assume that, in direct contradiction with all other acceleration feats in Star Wars, they did it only after Rebel fleet exited hyperspace... when, for all we know, Imperial fleet could have done it during transit.

General Donner
Bridge Officer
Posts: 217
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: The 1.5 megaton myth

Post by General Donner » Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:44 am

From what I understand, and feel free to correct me if you know better, the reason a realistic fusion reactor can't explode is that for its reaction to sustain itself, it needs a contained environment with an extremely high temperature. If there's a reactor breach, the reactor will cool down too fast to allow the reaction to continue. At best it'll gout some hot plasma ... which might look like a small explosion, but not the gasoline-like ones generally shown in movies.

At the same time, fusion reactors in science fiction are known to commonly explode like bombs. This can be seen in Star Trek, Star Wars and numerous other franchises. (I believe BattleTech is particularly infamous for its exploding fusion reactors.) This behavior is obviously not in line with what we would expect of them.

The simple solution, of course, is to assume that the relevant franchises use unrealistic fusion reactors. Possibly they operate on some other mechanism than atomic fusion altogether, or else they do use fusion as we know it but also include (by act of plot) some explosive element we wouldn't consider necessary. (I believe this is how JMS derived his idea of diesel-fuelled fusion.)

If we want to be charitable, we can suppose that the explosive element is something involved in the conversion of the heat and radiation a typical fusion reaction will produce to useful energy. These processes will pretty much require magic, anyway, given the unrealistically high efficiencies of most sci-fi power plants, so we're more or less free to speculate there; it's more than obvious they aren't using the simple steam turbines we'd put in ours, if we ever get a decent one running.

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: The 1.5 megaton myth

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:49 pm

Picard wrote:
As I have said, we have several pieces of evidence avaliable:
1) AotC/RotS combo, where we see lots of sub-kiloton shots, and kiloton-level weapons bringing down starships in single shots
No, you don't. You see unquantifiable shots that are detonating in the absence of an atmosphere, until you can provide me with a source implying otherwise.
2) RotS novel, which suggests heavy weapons in single-digit megatons
Except that I have already slapped down this calculation, and your response was to completely ignore the central thrust of my argument and hypocritically claim that the quote itself is incorrect. Of course, you will continue to present it as evidence in spite of this fact.

If you don't accept it, at the very least, just don't list it. Either light turbolasers are muli-megaton, or the quote isn't valid at all. There is no other possibility, and your insistence of the HTL theory, in spite of never even bothering to defend it, is highly ingenuous.

3) TESB, where we see ISD using kiloton-level shots from its medium turbolasers
No, these are lower limits. You don't understand this, do you?

You already have. I hope.
No. Post them again. I already posted the Endor quote for you a half dozen times, as you pretend to get amnesia every time I bring it up, so feel free to repost, or relink, your calcs; preferably the former.


It is not incorrect if we take only novel into account.
And star destroyers can bust stars if we only take the name into account. Do you realize that applying stupid conditionals that don't apply doesn't help your case in the slightest?

Meaning we're back to kilotons.

Besides:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latticework

That is effect I would have expected heavy walker's guns to creaate, in sufficient quantity.
I already addressed this, and you casually shifted the topic to the validity of the quotation itself. Only one ship was ever observed to have a heavy walker in its hanger, yet you assume that they were everywhere.
Battle was in atmosphere, yet we don't see anything to suggest even kilotons from any other weapons.

Stop bullshitting. Battle was in atmosphere.
Prove it.

And you have quite the nerve to call me a bullshiter, when you bluff your way into stating that fusion reactors can explode if they are "designed poorly". When I ask you to prove up...you suddenly shift your case to saying that they explode "in sci fi". ROFL.

Which is funny, considering how writers write universe with literary mindset
Explain why your blogs involve [pseudo]scientifically calculating the energy needed to vaporize X mass of Y substance, or comparing the melting points of durasteel and regular steel, or acceleration, or engine exhaust, when by your own admission, a scientific analysis of sci fi is impossible.

And on description from novel.

Unless you want to point out where exactly we have dialogue describing how superlaser works, of course...
Except that the description from the novel is one of the vaguest pieces of evidence ever put forth, and it's from the perspective of a Luke who hadn't the slightest clue that the Death Star even existed a few pages prior.

Where? Even OT did not have shield effects, as far as my memory serves me.
Yeah, they do. Perhaps you failed to notice that the shields glow white whenever they are hit.

Shields do not have impact on rate at which beam penetrates hull itself. Because, you know, by that point shields are nonexistent.
...yes, but the shields would have weakened said beam that penetrated the hull!
I don't have one.
Oh, so you were bullshitting me, again?
But from what I remember from the movie, we clearly saw beams from walkers penetrating the hull...yet hull itself was barely visible, so it could not have been thicker than beam. Which itself is 50-some centimeters thick at most.
I really don't trust what you remember, if you do not think that ISD's had shields in the OT.

They don't. What we see is protective fields shutting down due to their lightsaber work, and station falling due to patches of lava falling on it.
Um, no. We see the base self destruct. But feel free to provide me with a video, or a novelization quote.
Except I did NOT use it as an upper limit. What I used as upper limit was RotJ combat.
Except that you completely ignore the thrust of my argument, which is that, by your own admission, the engine exhaust of a parade-marching Acclamator already is enough to melt structural steel, yet you continue to believe that this space-age society uses standard steel in its starships.

So we have asteroids that can easily penetrate ISD's shields? So, by your logic, ISD's shields are incapable of stopping kinetic impacts; phasers are partly kinetic weapons, therefore ISD's shields would be incapable of fully stopping phasers.
Nowhere do I say this. We have no idea why the ISD's shields are down; but they were down, and therefore, attempting to use the asteroid hit as a benchmark for ISD shield strength is completely counter-intuitive.

Considering that we don't see shields during entire movie, and fact that there are some highly flammable asteroids in TESB, as well as fighters being shown as danger for subsystems during entire movie, we could make a case for no shields at all. Of course, that would require us to ignore the "our shields are down... AAAARGH!" part in RotJ space battle and comment of Mister "nothing can penetrate our shield" during TPM.
Thank you, you just defeated your own argument.

I would also like to point out that, if all of the asteroids in the Hoth systems really did have enough magical volatiles in them to self-vaporize upon collision, then the asteroid that shattered the bridge tower would have had many, many megatons of explosives in it that would have detonated upon hitting the bridge tower, and that the asteroids scene colliding with the star destroyer's hull would have been doing megatons of damage do the ISD's shields [and yet having no effect] with its magical explosives.

Maybe ammo? We see shells being used for heavy cannons of TF cruiser.
Except that the Invisible Hand was hit by several rounds striking its ammo deposits and did not vaporize instantly.
They do in Sci Fi.
Memory Alpha wrote:The self-destruct sequence of DS9 involves the computer ordering the station's main fusion reactor to disengage the reaction stabilizers, causing the reactor to overload, and the station to destroy itself. (DS9: "Civil Defense")
Bullshit. You cannot made broad generalizations across various sci-fi series as "proof" that fusion reactors explode. Who cares if they did once in Trek? We are talking about an entirely difference universe here, and you haven't provided the slightest shred of proof that nuclear fusion reactors are magically volatile in Wars.

Also, it would be imaginable that high-power fusion reactor using fuel as coolant could explode due to coolant leak into reactor itself.
No, you are bullshitting again. Please, cite your scientific source here.
Of course, most reactors would simply shut down, but Star Wars is insanely unconcerned with safety.
Poisoning the well. You admit that your own theory is both unscientific and requires us to suspend disbelief and assume magical stupidity across the board for engineers. Engineers that can build a moon sized battle station that does not self implode the instant it moves, an engineering feat that would make the NASA team that sent us to the moon look like a bunch of school children building a paper telephone.


Which is in direct contradiction with movie.

It throws your argument into water.

We don't see Imperial ships flying near Rebel ships to group with other part. If they did it, they should have done it during Rebel fleet's transit. Meaning that other group may also have positioned itself where it did during transit... not impossible, considering Palpatine may have known when Rebel Fleet was about to jump.
You aren't making any sense here. Why would this fleet, magically knowing when the Rebel fleet would arrive, move away somewhere else, and get replaced by another fleet, only for this fleet to move...around from the planet, while the other fleet disappears?

I really don't understand your explaination, at all.

And there is still Dooku's liftoff from Geonosis in AotC.

you assume that, in direct contradiction with all other acceleration feats in Star Wars,
Incorrect. Explain Dooku on Geonosis. Explain the X wings crossing half of Yavin Prime in one six second shot. Explain Padme's ship passing the rings of Geonosis in one to two seconds. Oh, wait, you can't.
they did it only after Rebel fleet exited hyperspace... when, for all we know, Imperial fleet could have done it during transit.
[/quote]

What the hell? How would they have anticipated when the Rebel fleet would arrive?

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: The 1.5 megaton myth

Post by Praeothmin » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:08 am

SWST wrote:
Picard wrote:Battle was in atmosphere, yet we don't see anything to suggest even kilotons from any other weapons.

Stop bullshitting. Battle was in atmosphere.

Prove it.
Easy, the flak bursts created black smoke, which cannot exist in space, like this...
Notice all the black smoke puffs from flak bursts?
Cannot exist in space...

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: The 1.5 megaton myth

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:49 am

Praeothmin wrote:
SWST wrote:
Picard wrote:Battle was in atmosphere, yet we don't see anything to suggest even kilotons from any other weapons.

Stop bullshitting. Battle was in atmosphere.

Prove it.
Easy, the flak bursts created black smoke, which cannot exist in space, like this...
Notice all the black smoke puffs from flak bursts?
Cannot exist in space...
Nah. The flak burst shells themselves could have had oxygen in them. Hence why you still see explosions in battles that are indisputably in space; the oxygen in the ships fuel the fires.

Picard
Starship Captain
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: The 1.5 megaton myth

Post by Picard » Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:11 pm

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:No, you don't. You see unquantifiable shots that are detonating in the absence of an atmosphere, until you can provide me with a source implying otherwise.
So, I knew that you know nothing about canon and about critical thinking, but now you prove that you don't know anything about physics and astronomy.

Battle was no more than few hundred kilometers up. Atmosphere goes far higher than that.
Except that I have already slapped down this calculation, and your response was to completely ignore the central thrust of my argument and hypocritically claim that the quote itself is incorrect. Of course, you will continue to present it as evidence in spite of this fact.

If you don't accept it, at the very least, just don't list it. Either light turbolasers are muli-megaton, or the quote isn't valid at all. There is no other possibility, and your insistence of the HTL theory, in spite of never even bothering to defend it, is highly ingenuous.
These turbolasers' bolts were visible from rooftops. Light turbolasers' bolts wouldn't bevisible.
No, these are lower limits. You don't understand this, do you?
Except that ISD gets destroyed by same asteroid field. Even assuming it spent days in that field, it wouldn't give it more than single-digit gigatons for shield strength.

Besides, it can go below kilotons for that scene, considering that asteroids are quite explosive. So no, it is FAR from lower limit.
No. Post them again. I already posted the Endor quote for you a half dozen times, as you pretend to get amnesia every time I bring it up, so feel free to repost, or relink, your calcs; preferably the former.
Here:
http://picard578.hostoi.com/
And star destroyers can bust stars if we only take the name into account. Do you realize that applying stupid conditionals that don't apply doesn't help your case in the slightest?
It helps you, because movies are far below ICS AND movie novels.
I already addressed this, and you casually shifted the topic to the validity of the quotation itself. Only one ship was ever observed to have a heavy walker in its hanger, yet you assume that they were everywhere.
I am saying that bolts cannot create latticework. It is physically impossible, and nowhere do we see any cannon firing bolts rapidly enough for bolts to form a line.
Prove it.

And you have quite the nerve to call me a bullshiter, when you bluff your way into stating that fusion reactors can explode if they are "designed poorly". When I ask you to prove up...you suddenly shift your case to saying that they explode "in sci fi". ROFL.
Do you know how far atmosphere extends?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Earth

Obviously not. Get your facts straight.
Explain why your blogs involve [pseudo]scientifically calculating the energy needed to vaporize X mass of Y substance, or comparing the melting points of durasteel and regular steel, or acceleration, or engine exhaust, when by your own admission, a scientific analysis of sci fi is impossible.
First, it is not blogs, it is blog and a website.

Second, it IS possible. Way writers write something doesn't change physics, just ways of interpretation.
Except that the description from the novel is one of the vaguest pieces of evidence ever put forth, and it's from the perspective of a Luke who hadn't the slightest clue that the Death Star even existed a few pages prior.
If superlaser is DET, how do you explain rings?
...yes, but the shields would have weakened said beam that penetrated the hull!
Bloody hell. When beam starts penetrating hull there are no shields. Beam weapons have continuous output of energy, it is not bomb which releases X energy and then part of it penetrates shields and part strikes hull..
I really don't trust what you remember, if you do not think that ISD's had shields in the OT.
And reason I would trust you is because...?
Um, no. We see the base self destruct. But feel free to provide me with a video, or a novelization quote
Okay. Take a movie... download it from Pirate Bay, I don't care, and then watch it. We can't have a discussion until you do.
Except that you completely ignore the thrust of my argument, which is that, by your own admission, the engine exhaust of a parade-marching Acclamator already is enough to melt structural steel, yet you continue to believe that this space-age society uses standard steel in its starships.
Except it obviously is not.

http://picard578.hostoi.com/startrek-vs ... power.html

I have calculated upper value for its engine output in that scene. Besides, we now have materials that withstand far higher temperatures than steel.
Nowhere do I say this. We have no idea why the ISD's shields are down; but they were down, and therefore, attempting to use the asteroid hit as a benchmark for ISD shield strength is completely counter-intuitive.
Considering that its command tower got destroyed only halfway throught asteroid field... and I am not using that particular asteroid hit, I am using estimates of multi-day bombardment which could have taken down shields.
I would also like to point out that, if all of the asteroids in the Hoth systems really did have enough magical volatiles in them to self-vaporize upon collision, then the asteroid that shattered the bridge tower would have had many, many megatons of explosives in it that would have detonated upon hitting the bridge tower, and that the asteroids scene colliding with the star destroyer's hull would have been doing megatons of damage do the ISD's shields [and yet having no effect] with its magical explosives.
Do you have any proof for "megatons of explosives"?

Even if we assume that asteroid which destroyed ISD's tower is pure TNT...

That asteroid is between 79 000 and 100 000 cubic meters

http://www.st-v-sw.net/STSWweakhull.html

http://picard578.hostoi.com/startrek-vs ... /hull.html

Even assuming pure TNT, you get at most 131 to 165 kilotons from it. When you add kinetic impact, it adds about 3,9 to 4,96 kilotons to total value.
Thank you, you just defeated your own argument.
Argument about shields being non-existent? Depends on wether visuals or dialogue take precedence... I take dialogue, so I never seriously considered possibility of Star Wars not having shields. If we take visuals...
Except that the Invisible Hand was hit by several rounds striking its ammo deposits and did not vaporize instantly.
Only things that I remember that were struck were cannons. Have a screenshot or a link?

Bullshit. You cannot made broad generalizations across various sci-fi series as "proof" that fusion reactors explode. Who cares if they did once in Trek? We are talking about an entirely difference universe here, and you haven't provided the slightest shred of proof that nuclear fusion reactors are magically volatile in Wars.
What about Death Star exploding? Starships exploding? Movie novel being specific about both being powered by fusion?

No, you are bullshitting again. Please, cite your scientific source here.
It's not a bullshit. Only thing you need to understand it is a limited knowledge of nuclear mechanics.

Poisoning the well. You admit that your own theory is both unscientific and requires us to suspend disbelief and assume magical stupidity across the board for engineers. Engineers that can build a moon sized battle station that does not self implode the instant it moves, an engineering feat that would make the NASA team that sent us to the moon look like a bunch of school children building a paper telephone.

And engineers that don't bother to put any security measures around potentially fatal super-deep chasms... one of which was located in Emperor's throne room, where anyone could have gotten behind him and push him down to death. And let's not forget that same security failure is not specific for Empire - it is seen in Republic before it.

Yeah.
You aren't making any sense here. Why would this fleet, magically knowing when the Rebel fleet would arrive, move away somewhere else, and get replaced by another fleet, only for this fleet to move...around from the planet, while the other fleet disappears?

I really don't understand your explaination, at all.
Your insistence on taking novel over movie where both obviously conflict doesn't make any sense either.

Besides... "transit" refers to hyperspace transit. If you have trouble understanding it, I am saying that Imperial fleet may have been behind Endor, but got sent where it did while Rebel fleet was in hyperspace, and couldn't get any message.

Incorrect. Explain Dooku on Geonosis. Explain the X wings crossing half of Yavin Prime in one six second shot. Explain Padme's ship passing the rings of Geonosis in one to two seconds. Oh, wait, you can't.
You explain why you think there was no time passing between scene cuts. Explain why ISD's were unable to avoid collision in TESB. Explain why Separatist cruiser in TCW did not manage to avoid crawling Venator which hit it.
Nah. The flak burst shells themselves could have had oxygen in them. Hence why you still see explosions in battles that are indisputably in space; the oxygen in the ships fuel the fires.
Except these flak bursts are not similar at all to ones seen in TESB, and have appearance characteristic for atmospheric flak bursts.

Post Reply