Mike DiCenso wrote:
A
Dyne is an actual unit of measurement that measures
surface tension. It is not a measurement of energy or power per se, but you could work out how much mechanical energy that represents and then convert it to watts or joules..
A Dyne per cm squared converts to 1.4 pounds/psi. So the warp core is capable of withstanding 5,600,000,000,000,000 psi!
-Mike
Actually the surface tension measure would be dynes per centimeter, or force over area in generic lay terms. Applying that to the warp core quote would require the surface area of the core to be worked out and employed, but even then it's iffy.
A dyne is an older unit of force, and it takes 100,000 of them to make a newton.
What I was brain-farting about in an earlier post was whether the concept of the warp core being given a measure in regards to force might be salvageable in the sense of the equation
here meant to avoid the concept of relativistic mass. That is, the application of the dyne unit would potentially be useful if we pondered a change of reactant momentum related to the localized change of the speed of light due to the dilithium matrix that was being considered in that post.
It's a reach (and a half), and there's still no good reason for the use of dynes rather than newtons in that concept, but it worked in my brain in context, though I haven't had opportunity to try to work it into any practical example. It may come to a dead stop anyway now that I'm reminded that he gave a figure in dynes per second . . . momentum's unit is the newton-second ("times" not "per").
In any event, I don't know that we could then be able to derive a power from that statement even in the best case where that brain fart applies.