That makes sense, they've stated at least once that the deflector can handle the most energy out of all their systems (I'm assuming that the Warp Nacelles score just as highly though, but only the two combined and not each separately). On the other hand, we don't know if the deflector can really channel all of their output at once, or what the effeciency of such a push would be.Mike DiCenso wrote:Jasonb wrote:How powerful of a weapons is the Navagional Deflector dish of Galaxy class starship. In Star Terk Best Both world part one. It is said Navagional Deflector dish used weapon could destory both Galaxy class starship that using that and the borg cube in thoey.
The real problem is that we don't have a situation where the nav deflector blasted into another ship that way. Neither do we have a good situation where the deflector weapon was used on a well-defined natural object, such as an asteroid. Alas, the closest we have to that is the nav deflector being used to fire technobabble crap at a technobabble asteroid core in TNG's "The Cost of Living".
Fortunately, we do have statements of both an upper and lower nature about Trek power generation capabilities, and that can be used to give us an idea of the potential power range for the GCS nav deflector. The lower limits would place it in the single-digit terawatt range, while the upper limit would be well into the exawatt and zotawatt range!
-Mike
Still, perhaps we should do some number crunching on how much energy it would take to push aside interstellar dust and micro meteorites at the speeds needed to make them stop the E-D. Then we'll have an idea for the lower limit of deflector output in general use, which is better than what we have now ;)