The best benchmark
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:13 pm
What is, in your opinion, the best benchmark question to ask people engaged in a debate over Star Trek and Star Wars?
That is to say, what question most improves the accuracy of predictions about what they will answer in future questions about Star Trek and Star Wars? This came to mind looking at the "Sovereign vs ISD" poll, which I would suggest is a benchmark question of sorts.
Within the VS community, the question of "do you think the ICS books give accurate firepower estimates?" seems very good, but it is a technical question that most Star Wars and Star Trek fans would not be able to answer off the tops of their heads - not knowing what the ICS say that has proven so controversial.
Another benchmark question is to outright ask what the result of war between the Federation and Empire would be.
More subtle benchmarks are the result of community cohesion, I should think, but they seem to exist. "Can fighters threaten capital ships?" and "How long did it take to build the second Death Star?" seem to have stronger correlations than we might initially expect when we start comparing VS fans with the general fan population; "Do transporters kill people?" and "How much of the galaxy do Federation ships actually travel about?" do as well.
Even some seemingly general questions have answers that seem to strikingly divide similarly, correlating strongly for one or another subdivision. "Does prosperity justify dictatorship?" is one, as is "Does rudeness distract from material debate?"
What's the best benchmark? Is the idea of a benchmark flawed?
Would it be worth surveying people to see if the patterns really exist in general, or are they simply illusory shadows cast by the most visible personalities?
That is to say, what question most improves the accuracy of predictions about what they will answer in future questions about Star Trek and Star Wars? This came to mind looking at the "Sovereign vs ISD" poll, which I would suggest is a benchmark question of sorts.
Within the VS community, the question of "do you think the ICS books give accurate firepower estimates?" seems very good, but it is a technical question that most Star Wars and Star Trek fans would not be able to answer off the tops of their heads - not knowing what the ICS say that has proven so controversial.
Another benchmark question is to outright ask what the result of war between the Federation and Empire would be.
More subtle benchmarks are the result of community cohesion, I should think, but they seem to exist. "Can fighters threaten capital ships?" and "How long did it take to build the second Death Star?" seem to have stronger correlations than we might initially expect when we start comparing VS fans with the general fan population; "Do transporters kill people?" and "How much of the galaxy do Federation ships actually travel about?" do as well.
Even some seemingly general questions have answers that seem to strikingly divide similarly, correlating strongly for one or another subdivision. "Does prosperity justify dictatorship?" is one, as is "Does rudeness distract from material debate?"
What's the best benchmark? Is the idea of a benchmark flawed?
Would it be worth surveying people to see if the patterns really exist in general, or are they simply illusory shadows cast by the most visible personalities?