Starfleet Jedi

While these (very old and oft mentioned points) about Mike Wong seem very valid, please cut down on the vitriol...
Just relate the facts and your analyses without insulting him, okay?
Thanks.

We could just say he's a menace to the vs debate, as well as to society in general-- but where's the fun in that?

Society in general? Thats a little ridiculous, don't you think?

Not to mention totally inaccurate...

So no, we couldn't say that... :)

So you don't consider unlawful acts of coercion as a "menace--" that explains your views on canon as well.

KirkSkywalker wrote:So you don't consider unlawful acts of coercion as a "menace--" that explains your views on canon as well.

What "unlawful acts of coercion" are you talking about?

And what the heck does my view on canon have anything to do with me not being paranoiac about Mike Wong? O_O

Absolutely nothing. But this guy seems to think things tie into SW and SDN that don't.

The Dude wrote:Absolutely nothing. But this guy seems to think things tie into SW and SDN that don't.

Is your name "KirkSkywalker?" Didn't think so-- not that it's ever stopped you from popping in your nosey 2-cents worth where it's not invited or wanted.
Just leave; you have never had anything constructive to contribute, and rotten couch-potatoes aren't allowed to critique.

Praeothmin wrote:

KirkSkywalker wrote:So you don't consider unlawful acts of coercion as a "menace--" that explains your views on canon as well.

What "unlawful acts of coercion" are you talking about?

Defamation, invasion of privacy and conspiracy, for starters. And yes, I went to law school; unless you did also, don't answer back.

And what the heck does my view on canon have anything to do with me not being paranoiac about Mike Wong? O_O

I never said you weren't paranoiac about Mike Wong, and indeed I'd never accuse you of not being paranoiac-- particularly since "paranoiac" isn't even a word.
I simply mean that your views on canon, as with those on someone being a menace, are simply averse to the official definitions-- being extremely liberal takes on both.

Nice to see that you learned absolutely nothing from your ban.

But hey, want to back some of this up:

Defamation, invasion of privacy and conspiracy, for starters. And yes, I went to law school; unless you did also, don't answer back.

With examples?

Keep typing, entropists say you'll eventually write the works of shakespeare.
(Watch that fly right over his head... it's small enough).

However you just revealed the fact that you've got some love-in going with the mods, otherwise you wouldn't even know about a ban.... I always knew this board, despite its huge "white hat" of "neutrality," was just another one of those troll-havens where you're all related, and anyone who's not in the clan gets banned... just like SDN.

No wonder it sucks as much ass.

KirkSkywalker wrote:Keep typing, entropists say you'll eventually write the works of shakespeare.
(Watch that fly right over his head... it's small enough).

However you just revealed the fact that you've got some love-in going with the mods, otherwise you wouldn't even know about a ban....

What the...
Stop being silly. Bans aren't anything secret here. Mods even announce them here or in the thread which warranted the ban.

I always knew this board, despite its huge "white hat" of "neutrality," was just another one of those troll-havens where you're all related, and anyone who's not in the clan gets banned... just like SDN.

No wonder it sucks as much ass.

You get banned because you're needlessly obnoxious and aggressive, and often crossing the line of trolling. It wouldn't take a genius to get the point of a ban, and you just manage to piss mods off.
Stop whining.

KirkSkywalker wrote:Defamation, invasion of privacy and conspiracy, for starters. And yes, I went to law school; unless you did also, don't answer back.

I will, anyways, because your studies probably told you I have the right to do so...
What examples of Defamation do you have from MW?
And you still haven't provided these "unlawful acts of coercion" he's allegedly perpetrated...
And, he conspired to do what, exactly?

I never said you weren't paranoiac about Mike Wong, and indeed I'd never accuse you of not being paranoiac-- particularly since "paranoiac" isn't even a word.

You are right, I've used the french word (paranoiaque) with english synthax, when I wanted to use the word "paranoid".
And since I'm not the one who considers MW a "menace to society in general", keeps posting comments about his sex life and how it makes him a bad person/parent, I'm definitely not the one who's paranoid...

I simply mean that your views on canon, as with those on someone being a menace, are simply averse to the official definitions-- being extremely liberal takes on both.

Except in the case of Canon, my views are backed up by people actually working with GL.
Are you going to tell us you work with him too, now?

And I'd say that because I don't consider an internet "persona" a menace to society, this shows I'm a bit more level-headed then some people...

KirkSkywalker wrote:Keep typing, entropists say you'll eventually write the works of shakespeare.
(Watch that fly right over his head... it's small enough).

However you just revealed the fact that you've got some love-in going with the mods, otherwise you wouldn't even know about a ban.... I always knew this board, despite its huge "white hat" of "neutrality," was just another one of those troll-havens where you're all related, and anyone who's not in the clan gets banned... just like SDN.

No wonder it sucks as much ass.

So that would be a "no" then. Ahh well, its not like it would have been anything new.

Hey Praeothmin, seeing as I'm "in" with the mods (all one of them), you wanna meet up for a trip to the range and some wobbly pops?

The Dude wrote:Hey Praeothmin, seeing as I'm "in" with the mods (all one of them), you wanna meet up for a trip to the range and some wobbly pops?

Yeah, sure, let's see when JMS is available, and we can even go down to Mexico for some Cervezas... ;)