Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:23 pm
by iconoclast
AnonymousRedShirtEnsign wrote:
Also, I don't really care what either the ICS books or Starwars.com have to say since both are non-canon sources.
Starwars.com is non-canon?
Isn't the site owned/run by Lucasarts?
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:31 pm
by Nonamer
SW.com is definitely not canon since it's not a published work. ICS is more debatable, though I hope most agree it's C-canon and does not override any other form of canon.
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:49 pm
by Mike DiCenso
Well, the Starwars.com databank is good for looking up the source EU and movie material it often references.
-Mike
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 5:10 am
by JerilynCabbott(C'boath)
If it comes from Lucas Film, how is it not cannon? That's stretching it a bit.
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 11:42 am
by Mr. Oragahn
Depends on your point of view.
A LFL official acknowledged the existence of two canon policies. One that's about the stuff GL did and the novelisations, and the rest about almost everything that's official and fits more or less with the EU's continuity.
That way, everybody's happy.