Starfleet Jedi

And yet the post that you just edited mentioned "Scum Sisters" and how we were "on our periods."

...


...

Oh yeah, don't think I didn't see it.


Addendum: I get that you're very angry you get hostile easily, but really, it's just a debate. I recommend you actually do the KSW Lite thing that was being suggested, your edit shows you didn't intend to be aggressive at the very least and that you at least thought twice about it.

DO NOT FEED THE TROLL -------------^

I see my hopes were sadly misplaced. Very well.

Praeothmin wrote:Wow!
I just read KSW's Chewbacca Defense link, and it basically describes KSW's very own debate style to a T...

Strange coincidence, since KSW accuses Warsies of doing the same thing.
Are you a Warsie in disguise, KSW?
Hhhhmmmm...

DO NOT FEED THE TROLL---------------------^

Now you're just spamming.

Trinoya wrote:Now you're just spamming.

I maintain that saying things like "concession accepted" is the lowest debate practice a person can use..but honestly when a person shows such unwillingness to even answer another persons post whether or not they think it's intelligent...that's a self inflicted loss more or less

Admiral Breetai wrote:

Trinoya wrote:Now you're just spamming.

I maintain that saying things like "concession accepted" is the lowest debate practice a person can use..but honestly when a person shows such unwillingness to even answer another persons post whether or not they think it's intelligent...that's a self inflicted loss more or less

More like only a fool takes up a fool's argument... and my momma didn't raise NONE. :D

SpaceWizard wrote: More like only a fool takes up a fool's argument... and my momma didn't raise NONE. :D

eh different debate-fu then on my side of the culture we were taught to respond to any challenge and if it truly was stupid bulldoze it rather then shirk-if for any other reason then to maintain a sharp skill set

Admiral Breetai wrote:

SpaceWizard wrote: More like only a fool takes up a fool's argument... and my momma didn't raise NONE. :D

eh different debate-fu then on my side of the culture we were taught to respond to any challenge and if it truly was stupid bulldoze it rather then shirk-if for any other reason then to maintain a sharp skill set

Ah-- you're from MISSOURI! :-D
Gotcha.

But there's a REASON that courts have something called "summary disposition--" i.e. to dispense with frivolous claims.

By your token, meanwhile, the taxpayers should be forced to waste their time and money giving them all a full trial, no matter how preposterous or poorly-based.

SpaceWizard wrote:

Praeothmin wrote:Wow!
I just read KSW's Chewbacca Defense link, and it basically describes KSW's very own debate style to a T...

Strange coincidence, since KSW accuses Warsies of doing the same thing.
Are you a Warsie in disguise, KSW?
Hhhhmmmm...

DO NOT FEED THE TROLL---------------------^

I see this is going nowhere productive. You guys need to stop baiting KSW, as it serves no purpose and it makes you look just as bad as he is. Especially you, Praeo, as you're also a mod, and need to set a proper example. KSW in turn needs to stop being nasty to people who simply hold a differening opinion on the subjects we're here to discuss.

I hope this is the last time I have to say this.
-Mike

Now you're trolling. I don't call you "PMS" or whatever.

Mea Culpa, Mike, Mea Culpa!

It's simply that I find everything KSW accuses others of doing, he does.
Everytime he accuses M. Wong of being a bad debater, and offers an example as to why (the only time he offers detailed explanations, mind you), we can also see KSW do the same thing in other threads.

I guess I simply felt like calling him out, but I admit it wasn't in the most diplomatic way...

So, you're saying KSW is a politician?

Praeothmin wrote:Mea Culpa, Mike, Mea Culpa!

It's simply that I find everything KSW accuses others of doing, he does.
Everytime he accuses M. Wong of being a bad debater, and offers an example as to why (the only time he offers detailed explanations, mind you), we can also see KSW do the same thing in other threads.

Oh really?

Well let's see some examples of this, and also prove that it's "the only time he offers detailed explanations" (vs. demands for spoonfeeding and convincing the ignorant).

Given your track-record of concurring with (or being fooled by) Wong based on obviously his miscontrued evidence-- as well as making other gross mistakes-- your credibility regarding such defamatory statements really isn't that good; it's just trolling and back-stabbing lies and slander out of spite for losing arguments.

As for the rest, you're really a disgrace as a moderator, and are simply using that postion to bully members, just like Mike does; in this regard, this site is just like SDN.

If by "bully members", you mean "tell a trouble-maker to quit insulting the rest of the board, start using evidence, and stop ignoring evidence he doesn't like", then yes, Mike D and Praeothmin are bullies.