A selection of interesting comments:
DarkTemplar wrote:I only said it to forstall Facehugger percieving what i said in this thread to be trolling and bannning me. It may appear to be snide, but i didn't intend for it to be so. I only said it so that the mods will give warning before they ban me. Unfurntunatly, what i have said in a previous thread on this subject has been percieved by facehugger to be trolling. Hence, my sincere, but somewhat ambigous comment. I realize now that it could be taken as being snide, and humbly apologize.
Cpl Facehugger wrote:Yes, it was trolling because you bascially tried to derail the thread into an idiotic discussion of the ICS.
I realize Admiral Vice doesn't appear to be a moderator, but is this really an accurate description of SB.com policy?Admiral Vice wrote:That was a major thread derailment. The ICS shouldn't even be comming up unless it pertains directly to some issue that intersects with the way SW technology works vis a vis the HV.
Is any critical discussion of the ICS, which is widely held to be inaccurate and controversial, and which has been retconned at a remarkable rate by other EU ("C" level) materials, is considered trolling on SB.com? It pretty clearly is relevant if anyone is claiming ICS firepower figures in order to advance a point, so that shouldn't be the issue.