Khas wrote:That... is exactly what I'm talking about.
Unforunately, I've not only seen it too often, but it's becoming more and more common as society becomes permissive and rationalizing of any behavior whatsoevr-- and
condemnatory of anyone upholding of interpersonal boundaries as any kind of healthy or rational value or import.
And the more impersonal it becomes, the more egocentric attitudes become in order to disregard the rights of others-- and/or simply deny any infringement, instead with the self-obsessed libertines attacking the
victim as the culprit who wants to impose his will on others. (Sound familiar?)
Like if teenagers meet in a school or other parking-lot near your house for the express purpose of fornicating right plain sight isiden a vehicle, the cops will often simply bitch at you for calling in a complaint about it, as if you're some kind of kook-- and refuse to do anything even though it's clearly illegal (and statistically, police often have a personal history of similar behavioral problems-- in fact it's what draws them to such positions of authority in the first place).
The website mentioned, literally
broadcasts his life regarding this type of behavior, as if we're supposed to be impressed by it... rather than disgusted by the inappropriateness and disrespect it displays for others, himself and his family. But true to modern breakdown in healthy values, his minions and others will call you a "prude" for saying so.. which is actually about as valid, as if you condemned pedophilia (which indeed this
is, in a sense, since he HAS kids! In any event, it's clearly not healthy for them-- but then again that's a relative statement, since the nut doesn't ever really fall far from the tree anyway).
This is another motive behind the secularism-angle, i.e. it faciliates the ad hominem rejection of any argument as worthless religious dogma, by providing such as a strawman for it-- just like like if you deny the EU as canon, you're a "Trektard moron."
That's inevitable with those bent on self-aggrandizement, since they seek to impose their will on others-- and to add insult to injury in the process by ruthless mind-games.
P.S. For the mods: I think this
is relevant to the topic, since in discussing "Another Blow to Hypermatter Fuel's Existence," it's essential to consider the motives for
claiming it in the first place-- and with it, the way that its claimants
think.