LMAO@SpaceBattles!
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: LMAO@SpaceBattles!
Update:
SS4 decided to back up the absurd mass scattering shite and mention that im not supposed to talk about the bullshit bans he gave me.
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=326
My replies that included a bit of your material in, im sure you do not mind:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=336
OH and then we have white rabbit pipe up:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=336
I replied:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=381
It goes back and forth for a while and dipshit SS4 steps in yet again to bail the twat out:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=402
So i point out the debate rules the other asshole facehugger forced upon me:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=406
And SS4 totally ignores it, snips it out with typical double standard bullshit and starts waffling to try and cover the fact along with excusing his bullshit completly:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=413
So i shoot that shit down as well:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=416
He hops in a bit later to waffle about a comment made from atom:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=436
Oh and during all of that he threw a bunch of infractions at me mostly for petty unimportant crap.
LOL some do not run out until Aug 12th 2020 and i wonder if eventually i will get infractions that will actually out live me, should i leave a fuck you comment in my Will maybe?...:).
SS4 decided to back up the absurd mass scattering shite and mention that im not supposed to talk about the bullshit bans he gave me.
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=326
My replies that included a bit of your material in, im sure you do not mind:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=336
OH and then we have white rabbit pipe up:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=336
I replied:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=381
It goes back and forth for a while and dipshit SS4 steps in yet again to bail the twat out:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=402
So i point out the debate rules the other asshole facehugger forced upon me:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=406
And SS4 totally ignores it, snips it out with typical double standard bullshit and starts waffling to try and cover the fact along with excusing his bullshit completly:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=413
So i shoot that shit down as well:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=416
He hops in a bit later to waffle about a comment made from atom:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=436
Oh and during all of that he threw a bunch of infractions at me mostly for petty unimportant crap.
LOL some do not run out until Aug 12th 2020 and i wonder if eventually i will get infractions that will actually out live me, should i leave a fuck you comment in my Will maybe?...:).
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1813
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: LMAO@SpaceBattles!
I still laugh at the fact that they allow people to claim Naruto can beat the god emperor of mankind
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: LMAO@SpaceBattles!
Looks like SS4 has given a 3 day ban to a "also ran" dude:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=109
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=113
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=114
Anybody wanna give odds on if he ever treats rabbit, leo1 ect to such a quick warn and ban?.
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=109
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=113
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=114
Anybody wanna give odds on if he ever treats rabbit, leo1 ect to such a quick warn and ban?.
- Mr. Oragahn
- Admiral
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Paradise Mountain
Re: LMAO@SpaceBattles!
What's the deal with the smudge thing?
Is it me or did SS4 ask you to stop referring to past infractions when it's actually a typical White Rabbit tactic, in order to discredit someone?
Anyway... frankly, just drop the point. You're not even arguing on some really solid piece of evidence, but on what one has said that may have some value because you have said that he said something etc.
There are concentric circles on that planet, something huge clearly happened, but it's nothing like a DET event, and the very fact that Kirk used that thing but never used anything similar later on, nor did anyone in the UFP, means it's best treated as a complete outlier, like, you know, they still had artifact on board and it was some forbidden tech but Kirk kept it in his cupboard just in case.
As for the mass scattering problem, Deadguy did claim that he had such evidence, but managed to avoid supporting his claim thus far thanks to some non-constructive provision he initially made, in that he'd provide his evidence only if you wouldn't provide the evidence you were asked to provide.
As I said before, it's kinda silly, and even came back to insist on the point, clearly showing that he claimed to have such evidence -- in his return-post, he obviously had entirely dropped the initial ludicrous provision and was now debating as usual, and making a claim, which we know was incorrect and still is.
Notice that he also referred to another planet in the meantime. What's that?
Kor, I suggest you do a civil and concluding post of some kind. Simply settle on the fact that what happened in Obsession clearly badly hurt the planet, left some kind of large scale geographical mark, while it seems it didn't completely erasin former mountain chains (which may speak of some matter rearrangement more complicated than mere input of raw energy here, we're more like a fusion of former relief mixed to a weird wave-like phenomenon that solidified into continent-wide concentric craters), or that the still remaining lines inside the "crater" could be where two continental plates meet and that's just another effect of the violent event (although, again, the fact that all is solidified is plain proof that something "unphysicsy" happened), then admit that it's a complete outlier, try to get the smudge bit out and, on another note, remind people that Deadguy2001's claim was clearly erroneous (stop asking him for evidence, he doesn't have it and it's unnecessarily lengthening the debate).
And please, cool down, even here. There are several infractions on this forum and it would be fair that you get warned for that.
Is it me or did SS4 ask you to stop referring to past infractions when it's actually a typical White Rabbit tactic, in order to discredit someone?
Anyway... frankly, just drop the point. You're not even arguing on some really solid piece of evidence, but on what one has said that may have some value because you have said that he said something etc.
There are concentric circles on that planet, something huge clearly happened, but it's nothing like a DET event, and the very fact that Kirk used that thing but never used anything similar later on, nor did anyone in the UFP, means it's best treated as a complete outlier, like, you know, they still had artifact on board and it was some forbidden tech but Kirk kept it in his cupboard just in case.
As for the mass scattering problem, Deadguy did claim that he had such evidence, but managed to avoid supporting his claim thus far thanks to some non-constructive provision he initially made, in that he'd provide his evidence only if you wouldn't provide the evidence you were asked to provide.
As I said before, it's kinda silly, and even came back to insist on the point, clearly showing that he claimed to have such evidence -- in his return-post, he obviously had entirely dropped the initial ludicrous provision and was now debating as usual, and making a claim, which we know was incorrect and still is.
Notice that he also referred to another planet in the meantime. What's that?
Kor, I suggest you do a civil and concluding post of some kind. Simply settle on the fact that what happened in Obsession clearly badly hurt the planet, left some kind of large scale geographical mark, while it seems it didn't completely erasin former mountain chains (which may speak of some matter rearrangement more complicated than mere input of raw energy here, we're more like a fusion of former relief mixed to a weird wave-like phenomenon that solidified into continent-wide concentric craters), or that the still remaining lines inside the "crater" could be where two continental plates meet and that's just another effect of the violent event (although, again, the fact that all is solidified is plain proof that something "unphysicsy" happened), then admit that it's a complete outlier, try to get the smudge bit out and, on another note, remind people that Deadguy2001's claim was clearly erroneous (stop asking him for evidence, he doesn't have it and it's unnecessarily lengthening the debate).
And please, cool down, even here. There are several infractions on this forum and it would be fair that you get warned for that.
- Mr. Oragahn
- Admiral
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Paradise Mountain
Re: LMAO@SpaceBattles!
Is Archy right or not? He flames you because you don't provide evidence. SS4 asks him to stop flaming people, and he replies with something like fuck off you're not doing your job properly.Kor_Dahar_Master wrote:Looks like SS4 has given a 3 day ban to a "also ran" dude:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=109
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=113
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=114
Anybody wanna give odds on if he ever treats rabbit, leo1 ect to such a quick warn and ban?.
Well, that's clearly provocative, even if there might some truth behind it (it's all based on if he's right about you not backing up anything, and still requires reviewing the thread).
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: LMAO@SpaceBattles!
I mention none of the things he lists and demands i provide evidence for, so unless SS4 moves the goalposts again im not obliged to do anything of the sort.Mr. Oragahn wrote:Is Archy right or not? He flames you because you don't provide evidence. SS4 asks him to stop flaming people, and he replies with something like fuck off you're not doing your job properly.Kor_Dahar_Master wrote:Looks like SS4 has given a 3 day ban to a "also ran" dude:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=109
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=113
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=114
Anybody wanna give odds on if he ever treats rabbit, leo1 ect to such a quick warn and ban?.
Well, that's clearly provocative, even if there might some truth behind it (it's all based on if he's right about you not backing up anything, and still requires reviewing the thread).
Oh and he also lies about dialog:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... stcount=82
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... stcount=88
Oh here is where he makes his demands
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... stcount=96
And my reply:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... stcount=99
So leo1 pipes up:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=119
And i reply:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=120
He continues with the Kira slating and even lies about the throw calling it a push:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=121
So i put together another slap down pointing out the lie:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=123
- Mr. Oragahn
- Admiral
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Paradise Mountain
Re: LMAO@SpaceBattles!
Calling Quark's fly a push is quite silly.
Now the choreography reminds me of this, but... still...
Now the choreography reminds me of this, but... still...
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: LMAO@SpaceBattles!
Calling the 40 torp fire-warrior event a 1 torp mass scattering was as well but that fucktard SS4 supported it so whats new..Mr. Oragahn wrote:Calling Quark's fly a push is quite silly.
LOL.
Now the choreography reminds me of this, but... still...
- Praeothmin
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 3920
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
- Location: Quebec City
Re: LMAO@SpaceBattles!
Leo1 behing dishonest is actually Leo1 being Leo1, nothing new under the sun...
SS4 has clearly shown his bias and dishonesty many, many times over, so nothing new there either...
What I can't understand is why that still seems to sruprise you, and get to you Kor, you should be used to it by now... :)
And yeah, a woman Kira's size lifting a 130 pound man clear of the ground with arms extended, and then throwing him 2 feet behind, 1 foot higher than her, clearly shows above average strength... For anyone with a working brain or high honesty, anyways... :)
SS4 has clearly shown his bias and dishonesty many, many times over, so nothing new there either...
What I can't understand is why that still seems to sruprise you, and get to you Kor, you should be used to it by now... :)
And yeah, a woman Kira's size lifting a 130 pound man clear of the ground with arms extended, and then throwing him 2 feet behind, 1 foot higher than her, clearly shows above average strength... For anyone with a working brain or high honesty, anyways... :)
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: LMAO@SpaceBattles!
I am not surprised i am enthusiastically reporting the newest events..:)Praeothmin wrote:Leo1 behing dishonest is actually Leo1 being Leo1, nothing new under the sun...
SS4 has clearly shown his bias and dishonesty many, many times over, so nothing new there either...
What I can't understand is why that still seems to sruprise you, and get to you Kor, you should be used to it by now... :)
And yeah, a woman Kira's size lifting a 130 pound man clear of the ground with arms extended, and then throwing him 2 feet behind, 1 foot higher than her, clearly shows above average strength... For anyone with a working brain or high honesty, anyways... :)
Yup yup.
- Mr. Oragahn
- Admiral
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Paradise Mountain
Re: LMAO@SpaceBattles!
Are Bajorans supposed to be that stronger though? That's like a Terminator lifting someone, it's quite a stretch of credibility, to say the least. SoD meter is low on this one.
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: LMAO@SpaceBattles!
Bud who knows if they are supposed to be that strong but in a thread where they have put a franchises choreographed fights up against "the 300" wankers (who have no material other than legends about oily chest waxers) and used the "little female kicks ass" line with Kira to claim klingons suck id say using the rules they put in place to quite rightly point out she has shown uber strength is not only valid but poetic fucking justice.Mr. Oragahn wrote:Are Bajorans supposed to be that stronger though? That's like a Terminator lifting someone, it's quite a stretch of credibility, to say the least. SoD meter is low on this one.
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
- Mr. Oragahn
- Admiral
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Paradise Mountain
Re: LMAO@SpaceBattles!
Considering that there is no reason that he'd change his style, we'll see how far he can try the patience of SBC's vs mods.
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: LMAO@SpaceBattles!
I am not sure why i did not think of it before but the DET propulsion claim he goes on and on about to claim power generation is easily debunked by asking to see it.Mr. Oragahn wrote:Considering that there is no reason that he'd change his style, we'll see how far he can try the patience of SBC's vs mods.