sonofccn wrote:I have and in likely an anomoly for this board I actually enjoyed it. What can I say I'm a sucker for a love story directed at raw naked capitalism.
Oh yeah right, if there's one thing which was driven by raw naked capitalism with absolutely no interference on its behalf by the government, it's the railroad-industry... just like all female
captains of industry are spankable uber-babes.
What the hell was Ayn Rand smoking, besides Camel unfiltered's with extra tar?
Also, railroads are a general anachronism today, which few people even think about other than when it delays their daily commute at crossings; if these guys really wanted to make the story relevant in the movie, they'd have updated the story to pertain to superspeed bullet-trains, and the Rearden-metal to some super-conducting mag-lev substance. This would also help distance it from the legacy of the American railroad, which has such a bad name that it even made Jesse James a hero in some films.
But perhaps it's more telling as is, since this underlies the hypocrisy behind Ayn Rand's brand of "capitalism--" which is what she believed existed in Czarist Russia before Bolshevism; in other words, she agreed with Marx's definition of Capitalism, but believed that's how it
should be; i.e. she believed in Social Darwinism, claiming that the fittest
earned their survival, and that Scrooge was right in "letting the poor die, and decrease the surplus population--" vs. the
reality that the upper classes in feudal countries didn't "earn"
squat, and that a truly free market generally
equalizes incomes and productivity on average, rather than stratifying them, via removing artificial barriers to the marketplace (which is the
real secret of elite success of the super-rich).
"Greed, for lack of a better word, is
good-- just like
up, for lack of a better word, is red."