sonofccn wrote:Mr. Oragahn wrote:I don't take it any more "seriously" than you do, really, judging by the length of your replies.
I wouldn't say that. You seem more caught up in the Terminator being "better", even now, and them "winning" while I more want a fun fight.
Yes, winning. That's the fun of it, I found a side that's better, like in football, and argued in favour of it. Because I estimated that the clones can't take it here, despite their better AT-TEs. It's a debate, you have to assume that at some point, chances are that a side could be found to be superior. That is all. So cut the hypocrisy, you asked who would win, basically, I gave you a documented answer. I had fun. I don't know what you expect aside from going in circles, somewhat, just to avoid any tough conclusion. The FEAR of the conclusion. Really, that's absurd.
Now, I wonder who honestly sucked the *fun* out of this with his "there were no legions of clone troopers at Geonosis", "battle droids have an aim as good as termies" and silly requests to prove beyond a shadow of doubt that firing a handgun is more lethal than switching on a 40W light bulb...
Mr. Oragahn wrote:Now I can understand that the fun is lessened when the side you're longing for would obviously get quite a beating. ;)
Not really, and for the record I still say the Terminators are the easy favorites to win, what drains the fun is playing against a partner who doesn't seem to want to put the calories into actually "debating" but rather assumes his is the only possible conclusion.
Oh the hell. Now it's I'm assuming and I pretend debating. Thanks, so much respect.
So yes, you're indeed sniping my entire post by painting it with one big brush that draws "hog wash" all over it. Again, thank you. Listen, stop being such a whiny sissy. My estimate is well balanced and substantiated.
If you want to debate, do it and drop the outraged riff, please.
Mr. Oragahn wrote: Now, you probably know that logic, observation and evidence rank higher when it comes to such debates, right?
Meh. I presume you feel your opinion is based on "logic, observation and evidence" same as I feel mine is. So why don't we just agree to disagree and call it a day?
Hey wrinkles, I'm sorry if you're so thinly skinned and may have forgotten how debates used to be, but this one was very tame and well argued on both sides.
So let's just say that yes, I believe my post proves, in a rather detailed and lengthy fashion, that my conclusion is decidedly based on logic, observation and evidence.
If you don't want to argue with that, so be it. We disagree. ;)