I'll reboot an ancient discussion of tanks vs walkers from here:
http://www.starfleetjedi.net/forum/view ... f=12&t=175
I see both as being good for specific purpose, but tracked vehicles are likely to be somewhat superior.
Reasons:
1) they are faster
2) better manouverability at higher speeds
3) better stability in most cases
4) lower profile (again, in most cases only)
5) less complex - lower price, easier maintenance
Now, walkers might have better performance across rough terrain, and walkers with 6+ legs are likely to cope better with loss of one leg than a tracked vehicle with loss of track. However, legs will likely be easier to destroy.
Thoughts?
Tanks vs Walkers: The General Case 2
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1433
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
-
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1657
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:23 pm
- Location: Sol system, Earth,USA
Re: Tanks vs Walkers: The General Case 2
Sounds good to me, two equally advanced examples I'd say the tank will be cheaper, more reliable and more stable.
-
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 2239
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: Tanks vs Walkers: The General Case 2
One thing about settings like Star Wars is that there is no reason Tanks can't have at least limited flight.
- Khas
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1287
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
- Location: Protoss Embassy to the Federation
Re: Tanks vs Walkers: The General Case 2
IRL, the only practical walker design would be a spider-walker, due to weight distribution, less chance of a missing leg crippling it, and the main body being low to the ground like a tank.