Lucky wrote:
So do a lot Babylon 5 craft that are considered equal or better then Star Fury.
Only Whitestars, starfuries, and thunderbolts do this.
Lucky wrote:They shoot down one, and you will notice no other fighter at the end of the battle besides those that survived the DS-II run.
Who dropped those fireworks at the end then?
Lucky wrote:That either means:
A) The dome was not a shield generator
B) The shields had already taken a pounding
C) The shield dome was not working for reasons aside from combat
The context does not imply any of those. If it wasn't a shield generator, then why was it shown being hit? If the shields had been taking a pounding, why didn't we see so much as a frame of turbolaser hitting the unshielded hull? Why would the shield dome not be working? Really? what reason could there possibly be? Electrician cut corners? None of this is so much implied, much less stated.
Funny, I seem to remember them jumping to hyperspace and escaping.
Lucky wrote:Porkins was shot down because he started flying in a straight line, and Star Fury do the ball turret thing with cap ships as well.
They do it to strafe capital ships. You realize you have to fly in a more or less straight line to do a strafing run, right? Kinda like how luke did it on the death star.
Lucky wrote:That doesn't show fighters have ECM.
ECM 'Electronic Counter Measures' These are designed to counter things like radar, scanners etc. Considering I have given examples to you on several occasions of them having this ability, I have no idea why you keep pressing this point. Drop it already.
Lucky wrote:He'd use the force.
I was talking about the nail pilot trying to steal air from a Star Wars ship. Those big fireballs were from exposed pipes being hit.
That wasn't what I was trying to prove at all. It was that a nial could easily pull off the same maneuver that the falcon did and hide on the back of a SD. Not that they'd necessarily need to, considering they have ECM.
That's a heck of a lot of pressurized air to make that explosion. Even if this was the case, I would hope that the Imperials don't pack pressurized air underneath every square inch of metal, that seems like a horrible idea. Either Luke got lucky, or the empire is made up of even bigger idiots then I thought. At any rate, that is another liability on the side of SW.
Darth Vader did not use the force on any of the pilots in the trench, even when he thought that 'the force is strong in (Luke)' he still used his targeting computer.
Lucky wrote:That would not make sense since they expected to be jammed.
Did they say they were being jammed? I don't remember this.
Lucky wrote:You do realize B5 has a lot of smugglers right?
What's you point? B5 scanners can't pick up smuggled substances any more then SW scanners can pick up droids on an escape pod.
Lucky wrote:ANH the only guy to be shot down was flying in a straight line.
Almost everyone who got shot down was flying in a straight line. Porkins was the only one one to get shot down by turbolasers while flying in a straight line.
Lucky wrote:It's proof of bad missile design.
What part? we can only really conclude that they go about as fast as a fighter and are destroyed by shots from enormous energy canons. Nothing about them seems to scream 'bad design' except their speed, meanwhile, in TPM we have those missiles that were fired at anakin....
Lucky wrote:It's not as hard as you are making it out to be. It's just a simple matter of having the missiles avoid obvious obstacles. We can do that now with toys.
And yet missiles in TPM don't have this ability either. Please point to the toys that can fly at missile speeds, and home onto their target while avoiding other projectiles.
Lucky wrote:Modern weapons can change where they are going after
Uh yeah......you do realize that those modern missiles can be shot down too, right? or confused with flares or chaff? Modern missiles DO NOT change direction to avoid other objects, they only fly towards the target they are locked on to. Since they seemed to be pretty much spot on in terms of accuracy up until the point they were destroyed, why do you think they would have to change direction?
Lucky wrote:It depends on their programing.
Modern missiles do not have this ability. It would be cost-prohibitive at any rate. Once again I point to TPM for missiles which you consider to be 'stupid', but those missiles had a much smaller excuse, considering the speed they were traveling relative to each other. The shots and missiles, by comparison, were traveling towards each other.
Lucky wrote:There are no mention of shields for the snow speeders. Why can't it just be armor?
The explosions that occurred were located off of the hull. We see what happens to landspeeders when the shots go through their shields, and even hits to the shields tend to bleed through-look at the damage to the canopy when luke climbs out.
Lucky wrote:So, why should we expect the bolts to look different?
There is a noticeable difference between the 'maximum firepower' blasters and the normal ones/normal setting. One would expect a visual difference between the various types of turbolaser if there was a firepower difference. Instead, all of the bolts look the same.
Lucky wrote:I suggest you watch the battle again. By your claims B5 should have not needed it's defenses, or B5 should have needed to counter ever shot, and the Narns should have been dead.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDhF9sxDm7E
The narn ship took evasive maneuvers. If you look when the ship is firing, the shots at the narn ship shouldn't have missed, but they did.
Lucky wrote:That doesn't speak well of Babylon 5 fighters since missile should out perform them do to the lack of pilots.
Fighters can perform evasive maneuvers. Missiles cannot. Theoretically missiles could probably do this, but that would be a waste of money on something that is going to get blown up if it reaches its target or not.
Lucky wrote:That doesn't really matter though since it is proof of flack function.
The TIE seem to come from the right, and the blasts from the left and or center to me.
It is not proof of flack if TIEs are doing it, since TIEs are not armed with proton guns, only their two blasters cannons/light turbolasers. We continue to see the 'flack' effect from TIEs after they have outrun the SDs.
Lucky wrote:It's an energy weapon with a "flak" function, and all CIS systems were part of the Republic at one time, and later the Empire.
Your claim that the empire used them isn't even backed up by the EU, and on screen evidence shows this happening frequently regardless of the ship doing the firing.
Lucky wrote:Lando is who Han got the Falcon from in the first place, so he was already familiar with it.
Would you want to fly a death trap like a B-wing?
Are B-wings deathtraps? do we ever see one get blown up on screen? None of the rebel fighters are seen to outperform the falcon, and that's the truth, rustbucket or not.
Lucky wrote:There are eight very visible guns facing forward.
You could ask why more Rebels did not fly things like the Falcon rather then use real war ships, and the answer would likely be the same. They are made to transport people and things more then they are made to fight.
All of the lambdas guns are forward facing. The falcon has an equal number of guns that are also capable of rotating. to track fighters. You keep on mentioning these there were better ships in the rebel fleet, but have yet to give any examples. Despite the fact that they have 'real warships' available, we never see these gunboats, or the transports for that matter. And really are these 'transports' that you group the falcon with really so weak that an x-wing or y wing is better? I really hope you aren't arguing that the falcon was worse then an x-wing.