You still don't get it!
SWST wrote:Let me get this straight:
1-You are a Troll, who immediately came in spouting bullshit claims without ever providing any evidence for those claims;
You claim A (that I'm a troll), and I ask you for proof. Your "proof" here...is to restate your premise
? You logic is this:
You are A because you are A.
2-Many people, myself included, repeatedly requested for such evidence, like the "20 millionzzzzzzz c speedzzzz for da SW", only to never have the evidence provided;
Yes I did. I provided two seperate calculations for FTL travel; one with which you did not rebute, another of which you did; or tried to.
3-You not only did not provide evidence, when people provided counter evidence to your claims, you went to other threads and used the same bullshit arguments, again without evidence;
You do A because you do A.
You're using the classic textbook example of circular logic.
4-People, who up to that point were indeed providing evidence to counter your bullshit, got fed up, and started saying "No, I will no longer provide what you request since you never do when I request it";
5-I said to those people "If you're tired of debating bullshiter A, then ignore him, or point to threads where evidence he requests has been provided many times";
6-You continue to bullshit, and are still a Troll...
I don't think it can get any clearer...
You can get a lot clearer, because there's something very, very foggy obscuring your statement:
How hard can this be? When I ask for proof that I'm a troll, your response should not be to restate your premise. This is the epitome of dishonest debating tactics.